Cloudron makes it easy to run web apps like WordPress, Nextcloud, GitLab on your server. Find out more or install now.


Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Bookmarks
  • Search
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

Cloudron Forum

Apps - Status | Demo | Docs | Install
  1. Cloudron Forum
  2. Grav CMS
  3. Grav 2.0 - copying a page is slow

Grav 2.0 - copying a page is slow

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Grav CMS
21 Posts 5 Posters 282 Views 5 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • S Offline
    S Offline
    superhua
    wrote last edited by
    #8

    @robi – Good idea!
    Yes, after installing Grav and LAMP (and then Grav on top of that), LAMP/Grav is still faster on the demo server.

    robiR 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • S superhua

      @robi – Good idea!
      Yes, after installing Grav and LAMP (and then Grav on top of that), LAMP/Grav is still faster on the demo server.

      robiR Offline
      robiR Offline
      robi
      wrote last edited by robi
      #9

      @superhua perfect for @james to take a peek.

      Drop the app subdomains of the demo server to help him out.

      Conscious tech

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • S Offline
        S Offline
        superhua
        wrote last edited by superhua
        #10

        @james Here are the two test sites:

        • Grav in Docker

        • Grav on LAMP

        (PM me for password.)

        1 Reply Last reply
        1
        • nebulonN Offline
          nebulonN Offline
          nebulon
          Staff
          wrote last edited by
          #11

          If both those apps are installed and using the same disk, I can't quite see how filesystem operations would in any case impact how Grav is serving up files. On top of this, the Grav package is also using apache to serve up the files.

          S 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • nebulonN nebulon

            If both those apps are installed and using the same disk, I can't quite see how filesystem operations would in any case impact how Grav is serving up files. On top of this, the Grav package is also using apache to serve up the files.

            S Offline
            S Offline
            superhua
            wrote last edited by
            #12

            @nebulon Thanks for the reply.

            Yes, both apps are installed and using the same disk.

            Good to know the Grav package is also using Apache.

            Quite a mystery why there is a difference in speed then! 🤷 🙂

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • S Offline
              S Offline
              superhua
              wrote last edited by
              #13

              Would the following making any difference?

              grav-system-info.yaml from the Dockerized install has opcache.revalidate_freq: "2s"

              while

              grav-system-info.yaml from LAMP install has opcache.revalidate_freq: "60s"

              ?

              robiR 1 Reply Last reply
              1
              • jamesJ Offline
                jamesJ Offline
                james
                Staff
                wrote last edited by
                #14

                Hello @superhua
                The official docker image of grav is also settings this to 2s.
                See: https://github.com/getgrav/docker-grav/blob/89920ea92715261adee817dc7d74f366621af5c9/config/php-grav.ini#L32

                1 Reply Last reply
                1
                • S superhua

                  Would the following making any difference?

                  grav-system-info.yaml from the Dockerized install has opcache.revalidate_freq: "2s"

                  while

                  grav-system-info.yaml from LAMP install has opcache.revalidate_freq: "60s"

                  ?

                  robiR Offline
                  robiR Offline
                  robi
                  wrote last edited by robi
                  #15

                  @superhua change it and test?

                  How's the CPU usage for both during the op?

                  Conscious tech

                  S 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • robiR robi

                    @superhua change it and test?

                    How's the CPU usage for both during the op?

                    S Offline
                    S Offline
                    superhua
                    wrote last edited by superhua
                    #16

                    @robi Thanks for the reply! No, I haven't changed the opcache.revalidate_freq as I don't know how. If there is a way to do that in Cloudron, please let me know. 😄

                    CPU usage for both is okay -- but the Disk I/O is quite different: 4.6 GB / 9.6 GB for Docker and 128 MB / 436 MB for LAMP:

                    Docker:
                    docker - Screenshot 2026-07-15 at 06.42.37.png

                    LAMP:
                    lamp - Screenshot 2026-07-15 at 06.51.33.png

                    S robiR 2 Replies Last reply
                    0
                    • S superhua

                      @robi Thanks for the reply! No, I haven't changed the opcache.revalidate_freq as I don't know how. If there is a way to do that in Cloudron, please let me know. 😄

                      CPU usage for both is okay -- but the Disk I/O is quite different: 4.6 GB / 9.6 GB for Docker and 128 MB / 436 MB for LAMP:

                      Docker:
                      docker - Screenshot 2026-07-15 at 06.42.37.png

                      LAMP:
                      lamp - Screenshot 2026-07-15 at 06.51.33.png

                      S Offline
                      S Offline
                      superhua
                      wrote last edited by
                      #17

                      Update: just re-tested on the Docker install, and the I/O amounts are now similar to the LAMP install.

                      However, copying a page in the GUI is still slow.

                      jdaviescoatesJ 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • S superhua

                        Update: just re-tested on the Docker install, and the I/O amounts are now similar to the LAMP install.

                        However, copying a page in the GUI is still slow.

                        jdaviescoatesJ Offline
                        jdaviescoatesJ Offline
                        jdaviescoates
                        wrote last edited by
                        #18

                        @superhua have you tried another browser, incognito tabs, no plugins, cleared cache etc yet?

                        I use Cloudron with Gandi & Hetzner

                        S 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • S superhua

                          @robi Thanks for the reply! No, I haven't changed the opcache.revalidate_freq as I don't know how. If there is a way to do that in Cloudron, please let me know. 😄

                          CPU usage for both is okay -- but the Disk I/O is quite different: 4.6 GB / 9.6 GB for Docker and 128 MB / 436 MB for LAMP:

                          Docker:
                          docker - Screenshot 2026-07-15 at 06.42.37.png

                          LAMP:
                          lamp - Screenshot 2026-07-15 at 06.51.33.png

                          robiR Offline
                          robiR Offline
                          robi
                          wrote last edited by
                          #19

                          @superhua You edit the .yaml file from the File Manager or CLI console.. then test your page copy.

                          It might help to fully describe exactly what you're doing to copy a page and how slow it is, so it can be tested on the demo server as well.

                          Conscious tech

                          S 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • jdaviescoatesJ jdaviescoates

                            @superhua have you tried another browser, incognito tabs, no plugins, cleared cache etc yet?

                            S Offline
                            S Offline
                            superhua
                            wrote last edited by
                            #20

                            @jdaviescoates Yes, I tried …

                            • Chrome
                            • Private browsing
                            • Minimal plugins (e.g., Admin2, API, Login)
                            • Clearing cache

                            … but no difference.

                            Copying a page in Admin2 is still slow.

                            Thanks for your reply!

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • robiR robi

                              @superhua You edit the .yaml file from the File Manager or CLI console.. then test your page copy.

                              It might help to fully describe exactly what you're doing to copy a page and how slow it is, so it can be tested on the demo server as well.

                              S Offline
                              S Offline
                              superhua
                              wrote last edited by
                              #21

                              @robi Forgive the basic question, but which .yaml file?

                              I'm using the copy page button in Admin2 to copy:

                              Screenshot 2026-07-15 at 13.10.45.png

                              It takes 12-16 seconds before I can edit the new copy on the Dockerized version.

                              In contrast, on the same server, the LAMP version takes ~7 seconds.

                              The demo server was faster, but yielded similar results (i.e., faster on on the LAMP install).

                              Thank you!

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0

                              Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                              Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                              With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                              Register Login
                              Reply
                              • Reply as topic
                              Log in to reply
                              • Oldest to Newest
                              • Newest to Oldest
                              • Most Votes


                              • Login

                              • Don't have an account? Register

                              • Login or register to search.
                              • First post
                                Last post
                              0
                              • Categories
                              • Recent
                              • Tags
                              • Popular
                              • Bookmarks
                              • Search