Cloudron makes it easy to run web apps like WordPress, Nextcloud, GitLab on your server. Find out more or install now.


Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Bookmarks
  • Search
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

Cloudron Forum

Apps | Demo | Docs | Install
  1. Cloudron Forum
  2. Announcements
  3. What's coming in 6.1

What's coming in 6.1

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Announcements
46 Posts 12 Posters 8.1k Views 12 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • nebulonN nebulon

    With 6.1 coming out soon, it would be great to be able to include more languages. Currently we already received a lot of work done in Dutch and Chinese and we will include those for sure. Shout out to @imc67 and fengchang for that effort.

    You can check the current state of translation at https://translate.cloudron.io/projects/cloudron/dashboard/

    Please raise your hand if you want to contribute to one of them, we need your language skills 😄 For furthering inclusion of people, not fluent in English, I think we should ship with any language being more than 50% translated. Looks like Italian and Vietnamese are on its way already.

    P Offline
    P Offline
    p44
    translator
    wrote on last edited by
    #8

    @nebulon said in What's coming in 6.1:

    Please raise your hand if you want to contribute to one of them, we need your language skills

    Does translation require login?

    nebulonN 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • P p44

      @nebulon said in What's coming in 6.1:

      Please raise your hand if you want to contribute to one of them, we need your language skills

      Does translation require login?

      nebulonN Offline
      nebulonN Offline
      nebulon
      Staff
      wrote on last edited by
      #9

      @p44 Yes currently we have disabled anonymous translation or suggestion and public registration to prevent spam. However if you want to contribute just send us a mail to support@cloudron.io with your intended username and the language you want to help out.

      P 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • nebulonN nebulon

        @p44 Yes currently we have disabled anonymous translation or suggestion and public registration to prevent spam. However if you want to contribute just send us a mail to support@cloudron.io with your intended username and the language you want to help out.

        P Offline
        P Offline
        p44
        translator
        wrote on last edited by
        #10

        @nebulon That's why "Save" button was disabled. I'll send an email to support.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • LonkleL Offline
          LonkleL Offline
          Lonkle
          wrote on last edited by Lonkle
          #11

          @girish said in What's coming in 6.1:

          Include alias in mailbox search

          Does this include domain aliases in an app setting's Location UI since I seem to remember these two features connecting in the Domain Alias thread?

          girishG 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • LonkleL Lonkle

            @girish said in What's coming in 6.1:

            Include alias in mailbox search

            Does this include domain aliases in an app setting's Location UI since I seem to remember these two features connecting in the Domain Alias thread?

            girishG Offline
            girishG Offline
            girish
            Staff
            wrote on last edited by
            #12

            @lonk No, that task is just about searching for mailbox alias names when doing search in the mailbox UI.

            1 Reply Last reply
            1
            • girishG Offline
              girishG Offline
              girish
              Staff
              wrote on last edited by
              #13

              Looks like this release is mostly done.

              @doodlemania2 Which app required turn server REST API support? That's the main task not implemented.

              jdaviescoatesJ doodlemania2D 2 Replies Last reply
              0
              • girishG girish

                Looks like this release is mostly done.

                @doodlemania2 Which app required turn server REST API support? That's the main task not implemented.

                jdaviescoatesJ Offline
                jdaviescoatesJ Offline
                jdaviescoates
                wrote on last edited by
                #14

                @girish Nextcloud High Performance Backend https://forum.cloudron.io/post/18253 🙂

                I use Cloudron with Gandi & Hetzner

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • girishG girish

                  Looks like this release is mostly done.

                  @doodlemania2 Which app required turn server REST API support? That's the main task not implemented.

                  doodlemania2D Offline
                  doodlemania2D Offline
                  doodlemania2
                  App Dev
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #15

                  @girish It's been a bit since I peaked at it, but if I recall, there are three main components to the High Performance Backend and two of those components wanted a TURN API. Hopefully/maybe (hehe), I documented it.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  2
                  • mehdiM Offline
                    mehdiM Offline
                    mehdi
                    App Dev
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #16

                    @girish quick question about :

                    proxyAuth: add 2fa

                    How's this gonna work with the basic-auth? Or is it just gonna be ignored for basic auth? (in this case, it does not really bring any additional security)

                    girishG 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • mehdiM mehdi

                      @girish quick question about :

                      proxyAuth: add 2fa

                      How's this gonna work with the basic-auth? Or is it just gonna be ignored for basic auth? (in this case, it does not really bring any additional security)

                      girishG Offline
                      girishG Offline
                      girish
                      Staff
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #17

                      @mehdi Currently, it is ignored. Do you think we should maybe disable password validation with basic auth and make it only work with app passwords?

                      mehdiM 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • girishG girish

                        @mehdi Currently, it is ignored. Do you think we should maybe disable password validation with basic auth and make it only work with app passwords?

                        mehdiM Offline
                        mehdiM Offline
                        mehdi
                        App Dev
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #18

                        @girish said in What's coming in 6.1:

                        @mehdi Currently, it is ignored. Do you think we should maybe disable password validation with basic auth and make it only work with app passwords?

                        That's an interesting idea. Another possible way would be to only allow BasicAuth if explicitely asked for in the Manifest. It would need a minor change for the apps that need it, but it's totally acceptable IMO. (both options are not exclusive :))

                        girishG 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • mehdiM mehdi

                          @girish said in What's coming in 6.1:

                          @mehdi Currently, it is ignored. Do you think we should maybe disable password validation with basic auth and make it only work with app passwords?

                          That's an interesting idea. Another possible way would be to only allow BasicAuth if explicitely asked for in the Manifest. It would need a minor change for the apps that need it, but it's totally acceptable IMO. (both options are not exclusive :))

                          girishG Offline
                          girishG Offline
                          girish
                          Staff
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #19

                          @mehdi I made an issue for this, so I can look into this for 6.2 - https://git.cloudron.io/cloudron/box/-/issues/765

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          1
                          • girishG Offline
                            girishG Offline
                            girish
                            Staff
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #20

                            Quick update on this: release is mostly done, just going through the CI tests.

                            jimcavoliJ 1 Reply Last reply
                            2
                            • girishG girish

                              Quick update on this: release is mostly done, just going through the CI tests.

                              jimcavoliJ Offline
                              jimcavoliJ Offline
                              jimcavoli
                              App Dev
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #21

                              @girish Just to double-check, the proxyAuth changes also include the path-exclusion logic, right?

                              girishG 1 Reply Last reply
                              1
                              • jimcavoliJ jimcavoli

                                @girish Just to double-check, the proxyAuth changes also include the path-exclusion logic, right?

                                girishG Offline
                                girishG Offline
                                girish
                                Staff
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #22

                                @jimcavoli Yes, proxyAuth exclusion is implemented. I only implemented a simple approach with a ! pattern for now (not an array).

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                2
                                • d19dotcaD Offline
                                  d19dotcaD Offline
                                  d19dotca
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #23

                                  Any ETA on 6.1, by any chance?

                                  --
                                  Dustin Dauncey
                                  www.d19.ca

                                  girishG 1 Reply Last reply
                                  1
                                  • d19dotcaD d19dotca

                                    Any ETA on 6.1, by any chance?

                                    girishG Offline
                                    girishG Offline
                                    girish
                                    Staff
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #24

                                    @d19dotca Should be out today.

                                    P 1 Reply Last reply
                                    6
                                    • girishG girish

                                      @d19dotca Should be out today.

                                      P Offline
                                      P Offline
                                      p44
                                      translator
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #25

                                      @girish 👏 👏 👏

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      1
                                      • girishG Offline
                                        girishG Offline
                                        girish
                                        Staff
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #26

                                        6.1 is out now. As always, we will roll out slowly since there are many changes. We are already aware of a small breakage that affected one server, so we will make a 6.1.1 soon till we find out any other issues. The breakage will manifest itself in the UI as "Waiting for platform to update" when installing an app or updating an app. If you hit this, let us know here, so we can know how common it is but most of the servers we control updated fine.

                                        marcusquinnM 1 Reply Last reply
                                        9
                                        • girishG girish

                                          6.1 is out now. As always, we will roll out slowly since there are many changes. We are already aware of a small breakage that affected one server, so we will make a 6.1.1 soon till we find out any other issues. The breakage will manifest itself in the UI as "Waiting for platform to update" when installing an app or updating an app. If you hit this, let us know here, so we can know how common it is but most of the servers we control updated fine.

                                          marcusquinnM Offline
                                          marcusquinnM Offline
                                          marcusquinn
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #27

                                          @girish 🙌

                                          Web Design https://www.evergreen.je
                                          Development https://brandlight.org
                                          Life https://marcusquinn.com

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          1
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • Bookmarks
                                          • Search