Cloudron makes it easy to run web apps like WordPress, Nextcloud, GitLab on your server. Find out more or install now.


Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Bookmarks
  • Search
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

Cloudron Forum

Apps | Demo | Docs | Install
  1. Cloudron Forum
  2. Announcements
  3. What's coming in 6.1

What's coming in 6.1

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Announcements
46 Posts 12 Posters 8.1k Views 12 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • girishG girish

    @mehdi Currently, it is ignored. Do you think we should maybe disable password validation with basic auth and make it only work with app passwords?

    mehdiM Offline
    mehdiM Offline
    mehdi
    App Dev
    wrote on last edited by
    #18

    @girish said in What's coming in 6.1:

    @mehdi Currently, it is ignored. Do you think we should maybe disable password validation with basic auth and make it only work with app passwords?

    That's an interesting idea. Another possible way would be to only allow BasicAuth if explicitely asked for in the Manifest. It would need a minor change for the apps that need it, but it's totally acceptable IMO. (both options are not exclusive :))

    girishG 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • mehdiM mehdi

      @girish said in What's coming in 6.1:

      @mehdi Currently, it is ignored. Do you think we should maybe disable password validation with basic auth and make it only work with app passwords?

      That's an interesting idea. Another possible way would be to only allow BasicAuth if explicitely asked for in the Manifest. It would need a minor change for the apps that need it, but it's totally acceptable IMO. (both options are not exclusive :))

      girishG Offline
      girishG Offline
      girish
      Staff
      wrote on last edited by
      #19

      @mehdi I made an issue for this, so I can look into this for 6.2 - https://git.cloudron.io/cloudron/box/-/issues/765

      1 Reply Last reply
      1
      • girishG Offline
        girishG Offline
        girish
        Staff
        wrote on last edited by
        #20

        Quick update on this: release is mostly done, just going through the CI tests.

        jimcavoliJ 1 Reply Last reply
        2
        • girishG girish

          Quick update on this: release is mostly done, just going through the CI tests.

          jimcavoliJ Offline
          jimcavoliJ Offline
          jimcavoli
          App Dev
          wrote on last edited by
          #21

          @girish Just to double-check, the proxyAuth changes also include the path-exclusion logic, right?

          girishG 1 Reply Last reply
          1
          • jimcavoliJ jimcavoli

            @girish Just to double-check, the proxyAuth changes also include the path-exclusion logic, right?

            girishG Offline
            girishG Offline
            girish
            Staff
            wrote on last edited by
            #22

            @jimcavoli Yes, proxyAuth exclusion is implemented. I only implemented a simple approach with a ! pattern for now (not an array).

            1 Reply Last reply
            2
            • d19dotcaD Offline
              d19dotcaD Offline
              d19dotca
              wrote on last edited by
              #23

              Any ETA on 6.1, by any chance?

              --
              Dustin Dauncey
              www.d19.ca

              girishG 1 Reply Last reply
              1
              • d19dotcaD d19dotca

                Any ETA on 6.1, by any chance?

                girishG Offline
                girishG Offline
                girish
                Staff
                wrote on last edited by
                #24

                @d19dotca Should be out today.

                P 1 Reply Last reply
                6
                • girishG girish

                  @d19dotca Should be out today.

                  P Offline
                  P Offline
                  p44
                  translator
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #25

                  @girish 👏 👏 👏

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  1
                  • girishG Offline
                    girishG Offline
                    girish
                    Staff
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #26

                    6.1 is out now. As always, we will roll out slowly since there are many changes. We are already aware of a small breakage that affected one server, so we will make a 6.1.1 soon till we find out any other issues. The breakage will manifest itself in the UI as "Waiting for platform to update" when installing an app or updating an app. If you hit this, let us know here, so we can know how common it is but most of the servers we control updated fine.

                    marcusquinnM 1 Reply Last reply
                    9
                    • girishG girish

                      6.1 is out now. As always, we will roll out slowly since there are many changes. We are already aware of a small breakage that affected one server, so we will make a 6.1.1 soon till we find out any other issues. The breakage will manifest itself in the UI as "Waiting for platform to update" when installing an app or updating an app. If you hit this, let us know here, so we can know how common it is but most of the servers we control updated fine.

                      marcusquinnM Offline
                      marcusquinnM Offline
                      marcusquinn
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #27

                      @girish 🙌

                      Web Design https://www.evergreen.je
                      Development https://brandlight.org
                      Life https://marcusquinn.com

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      1
                      • girishG Offline
                        girishG Offline
                        girish
                        Staff
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #28

                        To minimize the risk, 6.1.1 is already out with the change.

                        marcusquinnM 1 Reply Last reply
                        6
                        • girishG girish

                          To minimize the risk, 6.1.1 is already out with the change.

                          marcusquinnM Offline
                          marcusquinnM Offline
                          marcusquinn
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #29

                          @girish All instances updated without a prob - but - no domain aliases?

                          Web Design https://www.evergreen.je
                          Development https://brandlight.org
                          Life https://marcusquinn.com

                          girishG 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • marcusquinnM marcusquinn

                            @girish All instances updated without a prob - but - no domain aliases?

                            girishG Offline
                            girishG Offline
                            girish
                            Staff
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #30

                            @marcusquinn It has to be enabled in the apps on case by case basis. I pushed out an update to surfer a few minutes back, if you want to see how the UI looks. EspoCRM update is coming up shortly. And WordPress afterwards.

                            marcusquinnM 1 Reply Last reply
                            2
                            • girishG girish

                              @marcusquinn It has to be enabled in the apps on case by case basis. I pushed out an update to surfer a few minutes back, if you want to see how the UI looks. EspoCRM update is coming up shortly. And WordPress afterwards.

                              marcusquinnM Offline
                              marcusquinnM Offline
                              marcusquinn
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #31

                              @girish Ahh, perfect. Yeah could do with soon as I kinda promised some people 🙂

                              Web Design https://www.evergreen.je
                              Development https://brandlight.org
                              Life https://marcusquinn.com

                              girishG 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • marcusquinnM marcusquinn

                                @girish Ahh, perfect. Yeah could do with soon as I kinda promised some people 🙂

                                girishG Offline
                                girishG Offline
                                girish
                                Staff
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #32

                                @marcusquinn Just fixing the tests, so should be out today (espocrm).

                                marcusquinnM 1 Reply Last reply
                                1
                                • girishG girish

                                  @marcusquinn Just fixing the tests, so should be out today (espocrm).

                                  marcusquinnM Offline
                                  marcusquinnM Offline
                                  marcusquinn
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #33

                                  @girish Just tested this for ya. Maybe a typo in there?

                                  6d72feaa-2afa-4bcf-bb95-9bfce0fce72a-image.png

                                  Web Design https://www.evergreen.je
                                  Development https://brandlight.org
                                  Life https://marcusquinn.com

                                  girishG nebulonN 2 Replies Last reply
                                  0
                                  • marcusquinnM marcusquinn

                                    @girish Just tested this for ya. Maybe a typo in there?

                                    6d72feaa-2afa-4bcf-bb95-9bfce0fce72a-image.png

                                    girishG Offline
                                    girishG Offline
                                    girish
                                    Staff
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #34

                                    @marcusquinn can you refresh the browser? Looks like missing translations

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    1
                                    • d19dotcaD Offline
                                      d19dotcaD Offline
                                      d19dotca
                                      wrote on last edited by d19dotca
                                      #35

                                      Forgive me if I missed it in the forums, but I just updated to 6.1.1 and noticed in System Info page that it no longer shows how much disk space each app is consuming. Is this expected behaviour? I sort of liked how I could point to individual apps disk space usage. Of course when you run a ton it becomes a long list but maybe the apps could be collapsable instead of just gone? lol. Just my two cents anyways if the move to hide them was intentional.
                                      9d6776f8-8d90-4012-a5ab-0f6ee083e34e-image.png

                                      --
                                      Dustin Dauncey
                                      www.d19.ca

                                      girishG 1 Reply Last reply
                                      1
                                      • d19dotcaD d19dotca

                                        Forgive me if I missed it in the forums, but I just updated to 6.1.1 and noticed in System Info page that it no longer shows how much disk space each app is consuming. Is this expected behaviour? I sort of liked how I could point to individual apps disk space usage. Of course when you run a ton it becomes a long list but maybe the apps could be collapsable instead of just gone? lol. Just my two cents anyways if the move to hide them was intentional.
                                        9d6776f8-8d90-4012-a5ab-0f6ee083e34e-image.png

                                        girishG Offline
                                        girishG Offline
                                        girish
                                        Staff
                                        wrote on last edited by girish
                                        #36

                                        @d19dotca that's not intentional, looks like a regression. It's not present in any of our Cloudrons either, so seems to be a general problem and not just specific to yours.

                                        edit: looks like the change to show volume usage broke something 😕

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        3
                                        • marcusquinnM marcusquinn

                                          @girish Just tested this for ya. Maybe a typo in there?

                                          6d72feaa-2afa-4bcf-bb95-9bfce0fce72a-image.png

                                          nebulonN Offline
                                          nebulonN Offline
                                          nebulon
                                          Staff
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #37

                                          @marcusquinn a refresh should fix this. Looks like for reliable updates without refresh we also have to version the language files to bust the browser cache on update.

                                          marcusquinnM 1 Reply Last reply
                                          1
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • Bookmarks
                                          • Search