@charlesnw good catch. I didn't realize Groups doesn't have search!

I just happen to recognize it now. Thanks @girish!

Amazing, thanks for confirming!

@scooke I have an idea, that people who will use Cloudron (and god forbid - understand how it works) and people who just need business services - it's a different set of people, buying different things. It's one of the engineering's curses, I believe: you don't just buy shiny cool smartphone with AI on it, that you hope will make your life better - you buy A20 chip with 32Gb, Llama 3.1 and cool new OS shell with an API that was finally made available. Cloudron's whitelabeling is for the later (engineers) who sell it to the former (business users).

If i remember correctly in the past the json response from the app store included the total install count of the app, but that has been removed meanwhile as it seems. But total numbers probably expose too much behind the scenes knowledge anyways. Another manufacturer with an app store concept used to publish their "top 10 app" once per quarter before they abandoned their market place. maybe that could be an interesting (and hopefully not too repetitive) marketing piece?

For anyone following that in a future - that is the post. @girish , thanks, got it! Hope that will be a smooth update!

@DualOSWinWiz the warning is like a softlimit warning. Basically the system will calculate the rough estimate of memory requirement based on the already installed apps and checks with the available memory of the whole system. Since memory usage heavily depends on the use-case and usage (number of concurent users for example) of apps on a Cloudron, we warn upfront to warn the admin, to at least keep an eye on the system to not overload it.

It does sound a bit dated. Have simplified it more to just "Try now!"

@scooke said in Notes on domains?: Christmas has passed; that same day was my birthday! Happy Belated Birthday! You have the same birthday as my fly expert friend Erica McAlister - check out her books here https://www.ethicalbooksearch.com/uk?query=Erica+McAlister

Domans management and App management are separate. Notice the Location section of your App, where you can change the (sub)domain of the app at will.

Yes this is done.

We were investigating this and it is on the roadmap together with the rewritten VPN app. It is not yet clear what is involved, but certainly a very useful use-case with Cloudron.

CR 9 (or earlier?) will have multi-backup destinations which might do what you're looking for without having to go thru a VPN and all that mess. But, have you seen the new VPN app? https://forum.cloudron.io/category/20/vpn

@girish said in Update App Store User Management filter to include Login with Cloudron OpenID: @jdaviescoates do you mean to separate OIDC and LDAP ? Yes

I think I still don't quite understand what you are trying to achieve here. The app proxy is not really for proxying to apps running on Cloudron itself, but to proxy for example apps which run on some other server and Cloudron can then provide DNS and certs as a reverse proxy.

Well, the thing is that I can obviously rename folders in my own account(s) in order to work around this, but when migrating accounts for other family members, colleagues or clients it's harder since I will be asking them to change their folder naming habits just because the mailsystem can't handle it. To be honest I never ran into this with other mailsystems and I've used / tried a considerable amount of them in the meantime: Google (Gmail/workspace), Microsoft (hotmail/365), Zoho, Mailcow just to name a few and they all accept periods in folder names. As a result we got used to use periods in our folder names. I'm fine if the default stays as it is in order to not break anything for other people, but being able to change it when needed would be nice. And yes, there are possible collisions with the internal folders (new, cur, tmp) when switching to FS, but this can be anticipated by setting the DIRNAME variable to something unique. In regards with testing, I'm not sure this has a huge impact since the working of dovecot shouldn't change in any way when switching to FS.

On the server where I have Nextcloud installed and backed up to Object Storage to Nuremberg and works fine. I will also give the settings from Memory Limit and Upload Part Size. [image: 1733477464697-1-resized.png] [image: 1733477159720-2-resized.png] [image: 1733477163222-3-resized.png] If you have servers in Falkenstein or Nuremberg and you send to Helsinki or vice versa then there maybe problems, because there is a broken fiber optic cable by probably by sabotage.