I am not so sure if every app would need a specific MCP server written for it, because as I see it, the MCP server should expose only the cloudron-specific functionality of any app, not allow with the app itself. What that means specifically: Using Claude Code, Cursor etc. I could prompt "check the production logs of my app to investigate why the hell this doesn't work". Ideally, via MCP, the AI could execute test scripts that have been uploaded before via terminal, or do similar basic things such as go through files of the app. I would be more interested in app-based interactions rather than the whole cloudron itself, but that use case might differ between people.

Connecting... root@16405153-e269-41e3-ab8d-095606d5b07e:/app/data/public/KNEL/FetchApply# gup Already up to date. root@16405153-e269-41e3-ab8d-095606d5b07e:/app/data/public/KNEL/FetchApply# cat /app/data/.bashrc cd /app/data/public/KNEL/FetchApply alias gup='su www-data -c "git pull"' root@16405153-e269-41e3-ab8d-095606d5b07e:/app/data/public/KNEL/FetchApply# Ah this opens up all manner of creature comforts. Excellent! Really appreciate the prompt response @joseph

Mail system is a feature of the platform, so the correct place is to open feature requests here.

@d19dotca You're right. Not sure if there is a Haraka setting per IPv4 interface. My servers seem to have over 200 IPv6 veth's. Uh is that normal?

This is implemented in https://git.cloudron.io/platform/box/-/commit/d7fdfd6d71c403f343f2e37dfc988f2c5a120898 . The app object now contains updateInfo . This has two fields isAutoUpdatable and manualUpdateReason (added in https://git.cloudron.io/platform/box/-/commit/84297ff473d6c0c100d2597e425c7edfe9481f8f)

Inspired by the recent discussion surrounding beszel, I think Scrutiny would be an awesome addition to the app catalog for those that are running there Cloudron on a server with several disks. I already use Scrutiny on my TrueNAS server and it has helped me more readily see the S.M.A.R.T. data and identify drives that are at risk of failure.

Good idea. I've made the domain dropdown add a filtering option with more than 10 domains: [image: 1749713363279-c843996b-b615-4e2a-9d07-2f65f3e1e45b-image.png]

Running mail-server and nextcloud on cloudron. Clamav would be a fine feature. What's the status of this request?

(this is off topic, but, I am a big fan of Cloudron and a swag designer by trade — I have a T-shirt design launching this June at UNIQLO. If Cloudron ever wanted to make a run of swag like tshirts, mugs, posters, stickers, etc [say, for an anniversary celebration], please consider me! Swag stores these days can be built and serviced basically for free.)

@joseph True, since common users hardly remember the website address to reset the password, this thing give chessy requests to support division in company where user always complain they can't reset password or dont remember the website to reset the password

@james Yes it’s technically a feature request. I only threw it in here since it seemed like Girish was already making adjustments to the filtering in the mail event log viewer. If you’re okay forking it to a feature request, that’s totally fine.

@robi said in Dashboard Widgets: Keyboard nav still stands on its own in both scenarios. Exactly. I wish they look into this soon. Now that you mention it, creating an html page with the proper links and having it pinned in the browser would definitely help. Thanks for the tip

Never heard of them before, and only you mentioned them so far in this forum Implementation might be easy, but the question is, how many would benefit from that. Question about prioritization I would suggest for now using Hetzner.

Was this ever implemented in any way? I'd like to visit services, system, and settings faster. Oh, and graphs in the app settings. Maybe a shortcut for that too. I have multiple CR's to keep an eye on. Widgets on the dashboard might work too.

@robi fair, yeah, that's a good point about individual app restores.

@makemrproper yeah, and actually it seems I might've been right afterall! I was sure I'd read something about the size... so I just search that thread for size and it is indeed there: Backup integrity - store size and checksum of backups. If they've got the size stored then should be easy to display it somewhere too!

Aha, right. Got it, thanks! @BrutalBirdie! @robi was suggesting just perhaps adding a [image: 1746952270741-e5b7693e-5b34-4b2b-9ec9-640d9ac4756e-image.png]

@joseph Yes

I'm currently doing something similar. I have a Proxmox cluster setup with local and cloud backups. If a server goes down the other 2 take over. I'd have to have a 3 server failure to be offline.