Cloudron makes it easy to run web apps like WordPress, Nextcloud, GitLab on your server. Find out more or install now.


Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Bookmarks
  • Search
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

Cloudron Forum

Apps | Demo | Docs | Install
  1. Cloudron Forum
  2. WordPress (Developer)
  3. Apache, OLS and Nginx-Custom Benchmarks

Apache, OLS and Nginx-Custom Benchmarks

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved WordPress (Developer)
performancebenchmark
27 Posts 7 Posters 3.8k Views 6 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • girishG girish

    I have used ab extensively for load testing - https://www.digitalocean.com/community/tutorials/how-to-use-apachebench-to-do-load-testing-on-an-ubuntu-13-10-vps . You can send out concurrent requests easily.

    d19dotcaD Offline
    d19dotcaD Offline
    d19dotca
    wrote on last edited by
    #5

    @girish ab is great, and jMeter too. Those are the two we use most frequently at work as they're the easiest but also give us the least trouble / cause less issues downstream when load testing (though the products I support at my day job are very complex API Gateways which have a habit of being temperamental lol)

    --
    Dustin Dauncey
    www.d19.ca

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • jimcavoliJ Offline
      jimcavoliJ Offline
      jimcavoli
      App Dev
      wrote on last edited by
      #6

      Blazemeter makes a really slick tool called Taurus - https://gettaurus.org - which makes using the heavyweight Jmeter miles easier and like 1000x cooler-looking in your shell. Definitely recommend it.

      d19dotcaD 1 Reply Last reply
      3
      • jimcavoliJ jimcavoli

        Blazemeter makes a really slick tool called Taurus - https://gettaurus.org - which makes using the heavyweight Jmeter miles easier and like 1000x cooler-looking in your shell. Definitely recommend it.

        d19dotcaD Offline
        d19dotcaD Offline
        d19dotca
        wrote on last edited by
        #7

        @jimcavoli haha, yeah Blazemeter is a great product and so is Taurus. I actually work for the company that makes it too (though not on their team, I work on another product portfolio in the company), full disclosure. 😉

        --
        Dustin Dauncey
        www.d19.ca

        1 Reply Last reply
        2
        • MooCloud_MattM MooCloud_Matt

          Hi!
          in the next days we start testing on 2 of the images we have prepared.
          We would like to know what data you would most like to know about their performance.

          Our testing environment will be:

          • 2 Epyc vCore
          • 2 GB Ram DRR4 ECC
          • NVMe PCI-e 3gen

          The app will be tested with 500MB of ram and 500MB of swap.

          Our goal is to have similar performance for our image and other WordPress hosting setup available, for this we have plan to test:

          • Cloudron standard apache setup (unmanaged)
          • OLS app that we have develop erly this summer (will be on the store early December)
          • Nginx custom build, with pagespeed mod, and some server side tweak to improve performance.

          All 3 with this combination:

          • With and without Redis object cache
          • We will use one or more cache plugin (which one is your favourite?) to test there performance with this 3 setup.
          • Just with server side cache.

          If you have any advice on testing tool to use, or other setup for wp to be test just commend, every thought is appreciated.

          Matt.

          LonkleL Offline
          LonkleL Offline
          Lonkle
          wrote on last edited by
          #8

          @moocloud_matt Where will you be posting these benchmarks? This is a really fantastic initiative.

          MooCloud_MattM 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • LonkleL Lonkle

            @moocloud_matt Where will you be posting these benchmarks? This is a really fantastic initiative.

            MooCloud_MattM Offline
            MooCloud_MattM Offline
            MooCloud_Matt
            wrote on last edited by
            #9

            @lonk
            here below, probably this week, in 2 or 3 days. also I wanted to specify that we will work mainly with Server-Side-Cache apart from OLS which integrates the server side with wordpress.

            Matteo. R.
            Founder and Tech-Support Manager.
            MooCloud MSP
            Swiss Managed Service Provider

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • MooCloud_MattM Offline
              MooCloud_MattM Offline
              MooCloud_Matt
              wrote on last edited by
              #10

              Soo here we are with some data, and information.

              To best test which solution was the best we actually have to create 3 image for nginx.

              • FastCGI Cache
              • Redis Full Pace Cache
              • Cache Enabler (html file cache) this is here to show app level cache, with direct integration with the webserver, the call is not pass to FPM.

              Our main image will be Redis Full Page Cache in till the support for RAM disk inside the container, then we will see how FastCGI will perform.

              Basic information.

              All the test are on our cloud platform hosted in 2 datacenter using 2 different server.

              Server 1:

              • 2 vCPU Intel XEON
              • 2GB RAM
              • and NVMe SSD on M2 Slot (over chipset) on RAID 1

              Server 2:

              • 2 vCPU AMD Epyc
              • 2GB RAM
              • and NVMe SSD on PCI-E directly to CPU on RAID 1

              Both server have 1Gbit's port

              The test are been done using as a client a server in the same rack, with the same specks of the tested one.

              Only the app what we was testing was on at that time, and have 1 Cloudron GB as memory limit, that mean 1/2 is ram 1/2 is swap.
              CPU Shares are set as default at 50%

              How we test

              Remember: this a preliminary test, not completely validated, we need to have various confirmation and runs before calming that they are perfect score.

              We reboot the server, then stop all the app.
              Check using HTOP if there was something going on on the server, if it was all clear we start testing.

              We build 2 page, using divi builder the most commune builder with Elementor.
              44e380a3-61ca-4477-b8b1-9269204ec6e1-image.png

              1811d7c2-2543-45fe-ae00-d3f600fe4541-image.png

              They have inline CSS, JS and we didn't use any plugin for optimizing the content, we have only use the plugin needed to enable cache control from WP.
              Both pages have varius CSS file and Image + SVG.

              For this test all image was the original, we will testing our auto optimize image script later.
              We execute 8 test for every App.

              • 5, 20, 50, 100 Concurrent session for a total of 500 session each.
              • For both pages + some image and CSS in the page, not all the content

              Results

              c6d329ba-71f9-4fa4-ad10-ba9ff194b89a-image.png

              What we see is 2 image that have server side cache boost there performance, they use different technique, redis full page cache save (similar to what nginx proxy cache do) a copy of the output in the RAM using the 300MB standard container provided by cloudron (we have better performance on Epyc due to low latency memory supported).
              FastCGI save part of the page and the information pre-elaborate on the NVMe Storage and some on the RAM (we have a 3% better performance on the Epyc server probably due to the Storage been connected directly to the CPU).
              What we didn't aspect was the terrible results (compare to the other NGINX set up) that Cache Enabler image have done, this is probably due to a check and the redirect of the request to an HTML page, saved in the NVMe Storage.

              Why Redis Full Cache is for now the fastest?
              Because it use a direct connection to Redis and is all in the cache, nginx don't need to interact with the FileSystem, and as we probably know Redis is one of the fastest "DB" available and is not limited to the IO for your disk, DRAM of your SSD, Chipset or raid card, but only from your RAM and CPU_RAM connection.
              Especially with near AMD CPU that provider higher RAM frequency and bandwidth, Redis Full Cache page show to be the fastest solution that we can provide on cloudron.

              Remember: this a preliminary test, not completely validated, we need to have various confirmation and runs before calming that they are perfect score.

              Matteo. R.
              Founder and Tech-Support Manager.
              MooCloud MSP
              Swiss Managed Service Provider

              d19dotcaD 1 Reply Last reply
              2
              • MooCloud_MattM MooCloud_Matt

                Soo here we are with some data, and information.

                To best test which solution was the best we actually have to create 3 image for nginx.

                • FastCGI Cache
                • Redis Full Pace Cache
                • Cache Enabler (html file cache) this is here to show app level cache, with direct integration with the webserver, the call is not pass to FPM.

                Our main image will be Redis Full Page Cache in till the support for RAM disk inside the container, then we will see how FastCGI will perform.

                Basic information.

                All the test are on our cloud platform hosted in 2 datacenter using 2 different server.

                Server 1:

                • 2 vCPU Intel XEON
                • 2GB RAM
                • and NVMe SSD on M2 Slot (over chipset) on RAID 1

                Server 2:

                • 2 vCPU AMD Epyc
                • 2GB RAM
                • and NVMe SSD on PCI-E directly to CPU on RAID 1

                Both server have 1Gbit's port

                The test are been done using as a client a server in the same rack, with the same specks of the tested one.

                Only the app what we was testing was on at that time, and have 1 Cloudron GB as memory limit, that mean 1/2 is ram 1/2 is swap.
                CPU Shares are set as default at 50%

                How we test

                Remember: this a preliminary test, not completely validated, we need to have various confirmation and runs before calming that they are perfect score.

                We reboot the server, then stop all the app.
                Check using HTOP if there was something going on on the server, if it was all clear we start testing.

                We build 2 page, using divi builder the most commune builder with Elementor.
                44e380a3-61ca-4477-b8b1-9269204ec6e1-image.png

                1811d7c2-2543-45fe-ae00-d3f600fe4541-image.png

                They have inline CSS, JS and we didn't use any plugin for optimizing the content, we have only use the plugin needed to enable cache control from WP.
                Both pages have varius CSS file and Image + SVG.

                For this test all image was the original, we will testing our auto optimize image script later.
                We execute 8 test for every App.

                • 5, 20, 50, 100 Concurrent session for a total of 500 session each.
                • For both pages + some image and CSS in the page, not all the content

                Results

                c6d329ba-71f9-4fa4-ad10-ba9ff194b89a-image.png

                What we see is 2 image that have server side cache boost there performance, they use different technique, redis full page cache save (similar to what nginx proxy cache do) a copy of the output in the RAM using the 300MB standard container provided by cloudron (we have better performance on Epyc due to low latency memory supported).
                FastCGI save part of the page and the information pre-elaborate on the NVMe Storage and some on the RAM (we have a 3% better performance on the Epyc server probably due to the Storage been connected directly to the CPU).
                What we didn't aspect was the terrible results (compare to the other NGINX set up) that Cache Enabler image have done, this is probably due to a check and the redirect of the request to an HTML page, saved in the NVMe Storage.

                Why Redis Full Cache is for now the fastest?
                Because it use a direct connection to Redis and is all in the cache, nginx don't need to interact with the FileSystem, and as we probably know Redis is one of the fastest "DB" available and is not limited to the IO for your disk, DRAM of your SSD, Chipset or raid card, but only from your RAM and CPU_RAM connection.
                Especially with near AMD CPU that provider higher RAM frequency and bandwidth, Redis Full Cache page show to be the fastest solution that we can provide on cloudron.

                Remember: this a preliminary test, not completely validated, we need to have various confirmation and runs before calming that they are perfect score.

                d19dotcaD Offline
                d19dotcaD Offline
                d19dotca
                wrote on last edited by
                #11

                @moocloud_matt Just want to make sure I understand... since the current WordPress Developer package uses Apache and Redis caching already, is the only difference with your testing for Redis involvement just that it's running behind Nginx instead of Apache? Just trying to understand the comparison between what we already have vs what you're proposing with Redis cache (since it seems the fastest and most similar to what we've already got in terms of Redis cache being used).

                --
                Dustin Dauncey
                www.d19.ca

                MooCloud_MattM 1 Reply Last reply
                1
                • marcusquinnM Offline
                  marcusquinnM Offline
                  marcusquinn
                  wrote on last edited by marcusquinn
                  #12

                  @MooCloud_Matt Nice work! I went through similar comparisons a few years ago with similar results.

                  Ultimately, we settled on FastCGI as relatively simpler and low to no maintenance needs when we're deploying updates throughout each day that need cache-clearing every time anyway.

                  Do you plan on having uncached benchmark instance comparisons?

                  For anyone else following and unfamiliar; WP Admin, Woocommerce, logged-in users, and any other dynamic content plugins can't use full-page caching.

                  The simplest page to test for uncached server config performance is /my-account/ when you have Woocommerce installed and /wp-login.php if you don't.

                  If anyone wants to test any page's uncached performance, just add a cache-busting random GET var to the end of the URL, eg: ?v=762138 and just change the number each time so it's always serves from php.

                  Web Design https://www.evergreen.je
                  Development https://brandlight.org
                  Life https://marcusquinn.com

                  MooCloud_MattM 1 Reply Last reply
                  1
                  • d19dotcaD d19dotca

                    @moocloud_matt Just want to make sure I understand... since the current WordPress Developer package uses Apache and Redis caching already, is the only difference with your testing for Redis involvement just that it's running behind Nginx instead of Apache? Just trying to understand the comparison between what we already have vs what you're proposing with Redis cache (since it seems the fastest and most similar to what we've already got in terms of Redis cache being used).

                    MooCloud_MattM Offline
                    MooCloud_MattM Offline
                    MooCloud_Matt
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #13

                    @d19dotca said in Apache, OLS and Nginx-Custom Benchmarks:

                    Apache and Redis caching

                    Sorry i was not so clear on this.
                    Cloudron now don't provide any webserver cache (for what i know), what you have now is a DB cache, it sit between PHP and the DB.

                    What you see as "Apache" in the test is the standard cloudron app with "REDIS OBJECT CACHING", during the test in all app testes that lvl of cache was active, but in the Redis Full-Page Cache we use a integration between Nginx and Redis directly in addition to the Object Cache, so that PHP will never get involve if the page was already been serve to a similar client.

                    i will use this pics by runcloud to show you:
                    bf3b54f8-9000-4879-8823-9e37e47ca3db-image.png

                    What we build is similar to what runcloud call RunCache, redis in this case is used to store HTML, CSS and JS content and not query to the DB.

                    Matteo. R.
                    Founder and Tech-Support Manager.
                    MooCloud MSP
                    Swiss Managed Service Provider

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    2
                    • marcusquinnM marcusquinn

                      @MooCloud_Matt Nice work! I went through similar comparisons a few years ago with similar results.

                      Ultimately, we settled on FastCGI as relatively simpler and low to no maintenance needs when we're deploying updates throughout each day that need cache-clearing every time anyway.

                      Do you plan on having uncached benchmark instance comparisons?

                      For anyone else following and unfamiliar; WP Admin, Woocommerce, logged-in users, and any other dynamic content plugins can't use full-page caching.

                      The simplest page to test for uncached server config performance is /my-account/ when you have Woocommerce installed and /wp-login.php if you don't.

                      If anyone wants to test any page's uncached performance, just add a cache-busting random GET var to the end of the URL, eg: ?v=762138 and just change the number each time so it's always serves from php.

                      MooCloud_MattM Offline
                      MooCloud_MattM Offline
                      MooCloud_Matt
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #14

                      @marcusquinn said in Apache, OLS and Nginx-Custom Benchmarks:

                      Nice work!

                      Ty!

                      @marcusquinn said in Apache, OLS and Nginx-Custom Benchmarks:

                      uncached benchmark

                      Yes we have already done it, we have a 20% on the complete page (whit all the css, js, pics, ...) tanks to the better resources management by Nginx on static content, we will provide more details later this week.
                      But no big improvement on just php-fpm (nignx) or fastcgi (apache) performance, apache is pretty much the best in just php content.

                      @marcusquinn said in Apache, OLS and Nginx-Custom Benchmarks:

                      Woocommerce

                      WC will be supported just on the Redis Full-Page Cache (Redis FPC) cache for now, we plan to support it on fastcgi early next year, with the support for tmpfs on Cloudron APP.

                      Btw on Redis FPC we will support partial cache soon, so wp-admin will be cached to, but partially.

                      Matteo. R.
                      Founder and Tech-Support Manager.
                      MooCloud MSP
                      Swiss Managed Service Provider

                      marcusquinnM 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • MooCloud_MattM MooCloud_Matt

                        @marcusquinn said in Apache, OLS and Nginx-Custom Benchmarks:

                        Nice work!

                        Ty!

                        @marcusquinn said in Apache, OLS and Nginx-Custom Benchmarks:

                        uncached benchmark

                        Yes we have already done it, we have a 20% on the complete page (whit all the css, js, pics, ...) tanks to the better resources management by Nginx on static content, we will provide more details later this week.
                        But no big improvement on just php-fpm (nignx) or fastcgi (apache) performance, apache is pretty much the best in just php content.

                        @marcusquinn said in Apache, OLS and Nginx-Custom Benchmarks:

                        Woocommerce

                        WC will be supported just on the Redis Full-Page Cache (Redis FPC) cache for now, we plan to support it on fastcgi early next year, with the support for tmpfs on Cloudron APP.

                        Btw on Redis FPC we will support partial cache soon, so wp-admin will be cached to, but partially.

                        marcusquinnM Offline
                        marcusquinnM Offline
                        marcusquinn
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #15

                        @moocloud_matt Cool, happy to help with some A/B testing on our WP stack which is rather bulky but quite well optimised on the app level. Eg, this site is running on Cloudron now:

                        • https://swanson.co.uk/
                        • https://status.swanson.co.uk/

                        Something like 200 plugins, including Woocommerce.

                        We use WP Super Cache for fragment caching, and happy to recommend it. Although, caching is the number one cause of issues with relatively new WP devs, so I always recommend optimising the app without any caching first, especially slow queries and php warnings before getting involved with caching.

                        The blessing and curse of WP plugins eh, anyone can publish them 😂

                        Web Design https://www.evergreen.je
                        Development https://brandlight.org
                        Life https://marcusquinn.com

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        2
                        • LonkleL Offline
                          LonkleL Offline
                          Lonkle
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #16

                          @MooCloud_Matt This is huge. Those gains are insane with not that difficult of an infrastructure change.

                          Curious, did you ever test an OLS implementation with their official OLS Caching plugin? The subject implied you were going to but maybe I misinterpreted the acronym (Open Lightspeed?).

                          MooCloud_MattM 1 Reply Last reply
                          1
                          • LonkleL Lonkle

                            @MooCloud_Matt This is huge. Those gains are insane with not that difficult of an infrastructure change.

                            Curious, did you ever test an OLS implementation with their official OLS Caching plugin? The subject implied you were going to but maybe I misinterpreted the acronym (Open Lightspeed?).

                            MooCloud_MattM Offline
                            MooCloud_MattM Offline
                            MooCloud_Matt
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #17

                            @lonk
                            we pause the OLS development, (is in beta and is stable) to focus on Nginx Setup.
                            Now our focus is to create a open beta soon, then post those app on the Cloudron store.
                            and early next year make a some image intercompatible, so you can change from FastCGI + PageSpeed to only FastCGI, or From RedisFPC to FastCGI, ...

                            But we don't know for now what we will able to do, we are focusing to prepare open beta for now.

                            Matteo. R.
                            Founder and Tech-Support Manager.
                            MooCloud MSP
                            Swiss Managed Service Provider

                            LonkleL 1 Reply Last reply
                            1
                            • girishG Offline
                              girishG Offline
                              girish
                              Staff
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #18

                              OLS also requires https://docs.cloudron.io/custom-apps/manifest/#httppaths feature which will be in coming release. So, makes sense to pause it a bit.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              2
                              • MooCloud_MattM MooCloud_Matt

                                @lonk
                                we pause the OLS development, (is in beta and is stable) to focus on Nginx Setup.
                                Now our focus is to create a open beta soon, then post those app on the Cloudron store.
                                and early next year make a some image intercompatible, so you can change from FastCGI + PageSpeed to only FastCGI, or From RedisFPC to FastCGI, ...

                                But we don't know for now what we will able to do, we are focusing to prepare open beta for now.

                                LonkleL Offline
                                LonkleL Offline
                                Lonkle
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #19

                                @moocloud_matt said in Apache, OLS and Nginx-Custom Benchmarks:

                                @lonk
                                we pause the OLS development, (is in beta and is stable) to focus on Nginx Setup.
                                Now our focus is to create a open beta soon, then post those app on the Cloudron store.
                                and early next year make a some image intercompatible, so you can change from FastCGI + PageSpeed to only FastCGI, or From RedisFPC to FastCGI, ...

                                But we don't know for now what we will able to do, we are focusing to prepare open beta for now.

                                I would love to be part of the Open Beta since I don't use my Cloudron for anything production, just dev.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                1
                                • MooCloud_MattM Offline
                                  MooCloud_MattM Offline
                                  MooCloud_Matt
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #20

                                  Update on WAF:

                                  We have disable the WAF features for now, that we had plan due to instability in TTFB timings.

                                  Maybe we will add a CDN to host blacklists and information repository that WAF module need to work.
                                  Because now it take from .9 to 2 seconds to check the ip/browser and our objective is to have mostly all normal page load in 3 or less seconds.

                                  update on redis full Page cache (fpc)

                                  We are working on the partial page cache, or sr-cache module.
                                  But we are not shore if this will improve performance even more.
                                  Is just a better management of the cache.

                                  WordPress nginx helper

                                  We are using nginx-helper plugin to let you clear your cache from WordPress, but due to how we are implementing stuff, we will create a fork to better sweet our nginx stack.

                                  prestashop php-fpm + cache

                                  We are working on prestashop for cloudron too.
                                  This is a test to see how much flexible is our FPM+fastcgi cache setup

                                  (No redis cache possibile, due to license on plugin to support it)

                                  Matteo. R.
                                  Founder and Tech-Support Manager.
                                  MooCloud MSP
                                  Swiss Managed Service Provider

                                  LonkleL 2 Replies Last reply
                                  2
                                  • MooCloud_MattM MooCloud_Matt

                                    Update on WAF:

                                    We have disable the WAF features for now, that we had plan due to instability in TTFB timings.

                                    Maybe we will add a CDN to host blacklists and information repository that WAF module need to work.
                                    Because now it take from .9 to 2 seconds to check the ip/browser and our objective is to have mostly all normal page load in 3 or less seconds.

                                    update on redis full Page cache (fpc)

                                    We are working on the partial page cache, or sr-cache module.
                                    But we are not shore if this will improve performance even more.
                                    Is just a better management of the cache.

                                    WordPress nginx helper

                                    We are using nginx-helper plugin to let you clear your cache from WordPress, but due to how we are implementing stuff, we will create a fork to better sweet our nginx stack.

                                    prestashop php-fpm + cache

                                    We are working on prestashop for cloudron too.
                                    This is a test to see how much flexible is our FPM+fastcgi cache setup

                                    (No redis cache possibile, due to license on plugin to support it)

                                    LonkleL Offline
                                    LonkleL Offline
                                    Lonkle
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #21

                                    @moocloud_matt Thanks for the update on your work! I love this stuff and it's going to be so beneficial to the community as a whole.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • MooCloud_MattM MooCloud_Matt

                                      Update on WAF:

                                      We have disable the WAF features for now, that we had plan due to instability in TTFB timings.

                                      Maybe we will add a CDN to host blacklists and information repository that WAF module need to work.
                                      Because now it take from .9 to 2 seconds to check the ip/browser and our objective is to have mostly all normal page load in 3 or less seconds.

                                      update on redis full Page cache (fpc)

                                      We are working on the partial page cache, or sr-cache module.
                                      But we are not shore if this will improve performance even more.
                                      Is just a better management of the cache.

                                      WordPress nginx helper

                                      We are using nginx-helper plugin to let you clear your cache from WordPress, but due to how we are implementing stuff, we will create a fork to better sweet our nginx stack.

                                      prestashop php-fpm + cache

                                      We are working on prestashop for cloudron too.
                                      This is a test to see how much flexible is our FPM+fastcgi cache setup

                                      (No redis cache possibile, due to license on plugin to support it)

                                      LonkleL Offline
                                      LonkleL Offline
                                      Lonkle
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #22

                                      @moocloud_matt After all of this development, what was your final stack after all of this research?

                                      No redis cache possibile, due to license on plugin to support it

                                      What kind of plugin, WP is mandatorily GPL for all themes and plugin code.

                                      MooCloud_MattM 2 Replies Last reply
                                      0
                                      • LonkleL Lonkle

                                        @moocloud_matt After all of this development, what was your final stack after all of this research?

                                        No redis cache possibile, due to license on plugin to support it

                                        What kind of plugin, WP is mandatorily GPL for all themes and plugin code.

                                        MooCloud_MattM Offline
                                        MooCloud_MattM Offline
                                        MooCloud_Matt
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #23

                                        @lonk
                                        it's only mandatory to be on wp.org repo

                                        Matteo. R.
                                        Founder and Tech-Support Manager.
                                        MooCloud MSP
                                        Swiss Managed Service Provider

                                        LonkleL 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • MooCloud_MattM MooCloud_Matt

                                          @lonk
                                          it's only mandatory to be on wp.org repo

                                          LonkleL Offline
                                          LonkleL Offline
                                          Lonkle
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #24

                                          @moocloud_matt said in Apache, OLS and Nginx-Custom Benchmarks:

                                          @lonk
                                          it's only mandatory to be on wp.org repo

                                          Looks like if it's a Wordpress plugin, then the code automatically falls under GLP no matter the repo: https://kinsta.com/learn/wordpress-gpl/ - that's why Wordpress premium plugins can be distributed freely.

                                          But a plugin can implement license protections to protect their code technically, it still doesn't take away the right of the user to use it in any way they see fit EXCEPT for graphic assets.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • Bookmarks
                                          • Search