Chatwoot - Simple and elegant live chat software
-
@v_shnu
Builds fine
But cloudron install --image xxxx gives me :Failed to install app: 500 message: ER_TRUNCATED_WRONG_VALUE_FOR_FIELD: Incorrect string value: '\xF0\x9F\x94\xA5\xF0\x9F...' for column 'manifestJson' at row 1
Seems to be some encoding issue but can't track it down
Looking further ... -
I think it was inclusion of emojis in CloudronManifest.json
Removed them and it installs
And .... I get "app installed".
Thank you
Now going to test it out -
@timconsidine Sorry about that. Forgot to push that change
-
@v_shnu app installs nicely now
I can run it and set it up in the app webpage.
But strangely I notice that the .env file in /app/data gets reset to default values after re-starting the app.
The changes are saved when I edit the file and save.
But then restarting the app resets the .env to default values (mostly blank).
Presumably this is not correct ?Although some settings in the app persist, so some db integration working
-
I think the reset of .env to defaults is because in the
start.sh
script there is this linecp /app/.env.example /app/data/.env
Ideally this should be on a run once basis
so I adapted the
start.sh
by checking for .env existenceif [[ ! -f "/app/data/.env" ]]; then cp /app/.env.example /app/data/.env fi
Let's see if that works.
-
This post is deleted!
-
well, yes, this works to ensure that the .env does not get overwritten with default blank values on restarting the app.
However I am finding that the
/packs/js/sdk.js
does not get loaded in the client website with the default configuration.
I have tried with ip address as the BASE_URL and also tried setting it to a domain name.
Both these fail with the port :3000 specifier : it is not working in the Cloudron environment.But changing the client widget to
var BASE_URL="https://cloudronapp.domain.tld";
(i.e. not IP address and without :3000 port) allows the client to load the script and chat from client is received in the app inbox.@v_shnu can you confirm it is OK to configure like this ?
Maybe update the github for others ? -
@timconsidine This is resolved. Please pull the latest changes.
-
@v_shnu thank you !
Thanks for your support and help to get this packaged for Cloudron. Working very sweetly.One small point is that the profile image for a user does not persist. It loads and saves initially, but seems to be reset when changing to another page of the app. Not a big issue because the rest is working nicely.
I love that you have iOS and Android apps and these connect to the self-host instance very smoothly. It's a big plus when choosing a chat app. Not sure if others here realise this is available.
@girish this seems to me stable and complete enough to be listed officially, but maybe you have some other checks you would like to do before then.
-
@v_shnu said in Chatwoot - Simple and elegant live chat software:
@girish Could you please take a look and provide some early feedback? What are the next steps to get this published to Cloudron app store ?
ref: https://github.com/chatwoot/cloudron-chatwootHey @girish, have you had a chance to look at this ?
-
Hi there, @girish any updates on this? I've contacted Cloudron (spoke to Johannes) but I was told that you guys are going to be occupied with the upcoming updates.
So I also contacted Chatwoot, apparently they have completed the basic version and are waiting for feedback from the Cloudron team to publish it on the app store.Would really love to use Chatwoot as a stable solution in replace of FreeScout (so many errors in Github, and I've just encountered one today). Chatwoot support is solid, I can imagine this app will be a gem if added in Cloudron.
Thank you! -
@aizat at the risk of being a broken record, try installing and using the unofficial version : it works fine : let cloudron get to it when they can, but you can be productive today
EDIT : if you need help to install, shout
-
I have now started to take a closer look and cloned the existing repo into our app library at https://git.cloudron.io/cloudron/chatwoot-app
@sojan_official and @v_shnu please let us know if you want push right to our repo
Sorry that this took us so long to get around it. A brief look already shows that this package is very far, however not based on our docker base image as far as I can tell, so looking into this now
-
@timconsidine Thank you so much! Its definitely not my level of technical prowess to handle it myself now. I'll do abit of research and will let you know if I'm stuck good to learn new things.
@nebulon Thank you so much
-
I have ported the app package to our base image now and the app at least starts up and seems to be running with basic functionality. I haven't had the time yet to dig deeper into its functionality to find more possibly missing bits in the package, but I've published it as unstable for a start so others can quickly give it a try.
As a heads-up the email integration is not done yet, so don't expect anything there so far