Cloudron makes it easy to run web apps like WordPress, Nextcloud, GitLab on your server. Find out more or install now.


Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Bookmarks
  • Search
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

Cloudron Forum

Apps | Demo | Docs | Install
  1. Cloudron Forum
  2. App Wishlist
  3. Jitsi Meet

Jitsi Meet

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Solved App Wishlist
77 Posts 33 Posters 28.8k Views 43 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • scookeS scooke

    @avatar1024 Hi @avatar1024 , I just went through the install process for Jitsi Meet, thinking it would be different/better than Zoom or Kopano. However, I am not convinced it is. A few things: 1) The other users STILL need to download the Jitsi app to connect. I tried on an iPhone 6, an iPad, a Pixel phone, and Chrome on my Mac and every one needed to download the Jitsi app to connect. 1A) the Jitsi app is not intuitive. The user has to enter the full url of the chat not just the room name. 2) The install (self-installed using https://jitsi.org/news/new-tutorial-installing-jitsi-meet-on-your-own-linux-server/) leaves you with a Jitsi server that is wide open to the internet. ANYONE who finds the url can start their own chat. Switching this to a authentication approach is long and convulated and requires installing Proxody and some other apps and making another virtual host using yet another subdomain... reading https://community.jitsi.org/t/easiest-way-to-secure-jitsi-meet/21330/43 led me to think it was "easy" but I did not find it so. 3) the pixel, iPad (2018) and Mac connected fine... the iPhone 6 couldn't maintain a connection and the app crashed every time, so somehow only newer mobiles seem to work.

    The only good thing I can say was the base install went fine, using a OpenVZ VPS with 2.5 GB ram. I wish I could say it is easier or better than Zoom or Kopano, but I haven't not found it so. Assuming that Kopano can allow guests to join with just a browser (and not an app like Zoom or Jitsi), and isn't wide open like Jitsi Meet is (without extra extra extra steps), then Kopano might be the dark horse of self-hosted group video chats.

    avatar1024A Offline
    avatar1024A Offline
    avatar1024
    wrote on last edited by
    #25

    @scooke Thank you for the reply. It is useful that you shared your experience. However as @yusf pointed out, if Jitsi was a Cloudron app then the set-up would be easy.
    Now I'm not sure I agree with you on the usability, and this might be a matter of personal preference which I don't we should discussed back and forth on here. As long as you use a laptop, you indeed only need the URL with Jitsi and you do not need an app. So @nebulon is right on this. Only on a phone you need an app, and while the jitsi app is not perfect, it works fine. You do not need to enter the whole url, only room name works (by default it uses the meet.jit.si domain but you can change the server url in the settings to put your own). Personally, out of the other Free Software option out there, Jitsi stills seem the most mature, reliable and easy to use so it'd be a great addition to Cloudron (and indeed very needed currently).

    Do we know if anyone is working on this? (I wish I could contribute but I'm not a programmer sadly)

    @jdaviescoates Thanks for the reply

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
    • nebulonN Offline
      nebulonN Offline
      nebulon
      Staff
      wrote on last edited by
      #26

      For jitsi to work properly, we would need a coturn instance on Cloudron, which unfortunately has to run on port 80/443 to work reliably on public wifis (other ports are often blocked there). So far we haven't found a solution to make turn work with our nginx reverse proxy, which also has to run on the same ports. If anyone finds a solution here, which we can try, I am happy to give it a shot.

      jdaviescoatesJ yusfY 3 Replies Last reply
      4
      • nebulonN nebulon

        For jitsi to work properly, we would need a coturn instance on Cloudron, which unfortunately has to run on port 80/443 to work reliably on public wifis (other ports are often blocked there). So far we haven't found a solution to make turn work with our nginx reverse proxy, which also has to run on the same ports. If anyone finds a solution here, which we can try, I am happy to give it a shot.

        jdaviescoatesJ Offline
        jdaviescoatesJ Offline
        jdaviescoates
        wrote on last edited by
        #27

        @nebulon damn, guess that means Jitsi wont be coming to Cloudron any time soon šŸ˜• wish I could help, but have no idea!

        I use Cloudron with Gandi & Hetzner

        1 Reply Last reply
        1
        • nebulonN nebulon

          For jitsi to work properly, we would need a coturn instance on Cloudron, which unfortunately has to run on port 80/443 to work reliably on public wifis (other ports are often blocked there). So far we haven't found a solution to make turn work with our nginx reverse proxy, which also has to run on the same ports. If anyone finds a solution here, which we can try, I am happy to give it a shot.

          yusfY Offline
          yusfY Offline
          yusf
          wrote on last edited by yusf
          #28

          @nebulon That is very unfortunate, but thank you for explaining these underlying issues. Do I understand it correctly that if there's a solution, the TURN server would need to be a part of the Cloudron software itself, not an app?

          1 Reply Last reply
          1
          • nebulonN nebulon

            For jitsi to work properly, we would need a coturn instance on Cloudron, which unfortunately has to run on port 80/443 to work reliably on public wifis (other ports are often blocked there). So far we haven't found a solution to make turn work with our nginx reverse proxy, which also has to run on the same ports. If anyone finds a solution here, which we can try, I am happy to give it a shot.

            jdaviescoatesJ Offline
            jdaviescoatesJ Offline
            jdaviescoates
            wrote on last edited by jdaviescoates
            #29

            @nebulon said in Jitsi Meet:

            For jitsi to work properly, we would need a coturn instance on Cloudron, which unfortunately has to run on port 80/443 to work reliably on public wifis (other ports are often blocked there)

            Perhaps an interim solution would be to use other ports? I'm mean, it'd be great if people could join using open public WiFi, but I think in many use cases Jitsi not working on such networks wouldn't be too much of an issue. Eg. Like right now the need is for people in covid_19 coronavirus lockdown using their own private WiFi to be able to use it.

            I note @iqweb has managed to install a coturn server on the same VPS as their Cloudron, for use with Nextcloud Talk, could that be part of the solution to getting Jitsi working too? https://forum.cloudron.io/post/4207

            I use Cloudron with Gandi & Hetzner

            1 Reply Last reply
            1
            • girishG Offline
              girishG Offline
              girish
              Staff
              wrote on last edited by girish
              #30

              Before everyone jumps to conclusions šŸ™‚ So far, @nebulon has been trying to make coturn to be part of the app itself. This is indeed quite hard.

              So, I think what this means is that we have to integrate the turn server into the platform code base itself. So, it would become an addon/service just like the databases and other things. And then nextcloud, jitsi, kopano meet etc can just use this coturn service. Integrating coturn into cloudron is not very hard but will require a new release of Cloudron.

              jdaviescoatesJ 1 Reply Last reply
              8
              • jimcavoliJ Offline
                jimcavoliJ Offline
                jimcavoli
                App Dev
                wrote on last edited by
                #31

                Thanks for the added clarity, @girish - certainly look forward to this and other apps such an addition would enable!

                1 Reply Last reply
                1
                • girishG girish

                  Before everyone jumps to conclusions šŸ™‚ So far, @nebulon has been trying to make coturn to be part of the app itself. This is indeed quite hard.

                  So, I think what this means is that we have to integrate the turn server into the platform code base itself. So, it would become an addon/service just like the databases and other things. And then nextcloud, jitsi, kopano meet etc can just use this coturn service. Integrating coturn into cloudron is not very hard but will require a new release of Cloudron.

                  jdaviescoatesJ Offline
                  jdaviescoatesJ Offline
                  jdaviescoates
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #32

                  @girish said in Jitsi Meet:

                  So, I think what this means is that we have to integrate the turn server into the platform code base itself. So, it would become an addon/service just like the databases and other things. And then nextcloud, jitsi, kopano meet etc can just use this coturn service. Integrating coturn into cloudron is not very hard but will require a new release of Cloudron.

                  šŸ™‚

                  That'd be totally awesome!

                  Which I guess is what we've come to expect from Cloudron šŸ˜„

                  It also sounds like having a turn server service/ addon that can be used by nextcloud talk/ jitsi meet/ kopano meet etc, would be a much better solution anyway, so I'm actually really glad that making it part of the app is hard! šŸ™‚

                  I use Cloudron with Gandi & Hetzner

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  1
                  • yusfY Offline
                    yusfY Offline
                    yusf
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #33

                    Great thinking @girish! In addition to Nextcloud Talk, Jitsi Meet and Kopano, the Matrix app will also benefit from this.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    2
                    • yusfY Offline
                      yusfY Offline
                      yusf
                      wrote on last edited by yusf
                      #34

                      On the app packaging level, has there been efforts to include LDAP support? I’d like for Cloudron users to be the ones able to create rooms, then able to invite whoever: users and guests alike.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      1
                      • yusfY Offline
                        yusfY Offline
                        yusf
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #35

                        LDAP seems to be supported out of the box in dockerized Jitsi Meet! šŸŽ‰

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        3
                        • jdaviescoatesJ Offline
                          jdaviescoatesJ Offline
                          jdaviescoates
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #36

                          Sounds like end to end encryption coming to jitsi soon (although also sounds like perhaps only for chromium/ chrome):

                          https://jitsi.org/news/e2ee/

                          I use Cloudron with Gandi & Hetzner

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          3
                          • imc67I Offline
                            imc67I Offline
                            imc67
                            translator
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #37

                            Any news on a Jitsi app on Cloudron?

                            The Privacy Authority of The Netherlands published a overview of video-call apps (https://autoriteitpersoonsgegevens.nl/nl/nieuws/keuzehulp-privacy-bij-videobel-apps) and here (https://autoriteitpersoonsgegevens.nl/sites/default/files/atoms/files/keuzehulp_privacy_videobellen.pdf) you see that it looks like Jitsi is the best choice!

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            3
                            • imc67I Offline
                              imc67I Offline
                              imc67
                              translator
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #38

                              @girish is there any news? Our experience with Kopano Meet was not succesfull and as mentioned above Jitsi is the best solution in this COVID-19 times.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              1
                              • yusfY Offline
                                yusfY Offline
                                yusf
                                wrote on last edited by yusf
                                #39

                                I’m also awaiting Jitsi. Maybe it would also make sense from a (Cloudron) marketing perspective? Like,

                                Ready to drop Zoom for something free, unlimited and safe? Host Jitsi Meet yourself in 10 clicks with Cloudron.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                3
                                • nebulonN Offline
                                  nebulonN Offline
                                  nebulon
                                  Staff
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #40

                                  No major news on this so far, unfortunately it is quite the beast to package with a lot of undocumented configuration options, even their own debian packaging scripts are a hit and miss in our experience. Surely it would be good to have and hopefully eventually we will get there.

                                  yusfY 1 Reply Last reply
                                  4
                                  • nebulonN nebulon

                                    No major news on this so far, unfortunately it is quite the beast to package with a lot of undocumented configuration options, even their own debian packaging scripts are a hit and miss in our experience. Surely it would be good to have and hopefully eventually we will get there.

                                    yusfY Offline
                                    yusfY Offline
                                    yusf
                                    wrote on last edited by yusf
                                    #41

                                    @nebulon Keep us posted for any aid you need in furthering this endeavor.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    1
                                    • necrevistonnezrN Offline
                                      necrevistonnezrN Offline
                                      necrevistonnezr
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #42

                                      Office topic: Jitsi gets integrated in the Brave Browser - https://www.ghacks.net/2020/05/27/brave-launches-brave-together-video-calling-in-latest-nightly-version/amp/

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      2
                                      • A Offline
                                        A Offline
                                        andrewj720
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #43

                                        +1 for Jitsi Meet Server on Cloudron

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        2
                                        • S Offline
                                          S Offline
                                          stefan.werner
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #44

                                          +1 for Jitsi Meet Server on Cloudron

                                          Especially with user manegement

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          4
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • Bookmarks
                                          • Search