Spam as a Boolean value for filtering
-
It may be nice to have spam as a boolean value for filtering, as sometimes I want to run a search against all "ham" messages instead of "spam" message, but there's no way to filter to just "ham" messages at the moment. This is likely an unusual use-case, but I find myself searching for SpamAssassin rule names for example and wanting to use them to locate any obvious spam in the logs that got through as ham, but this takes a lot of clicking around on ones that are already caught as spam for example.
-
It may be nice to have spam as a boolean value for filtering, as sometimes I want to run a search against all "ham" messages instead of "spam" message, but there's no way to filter to just "ham" messages at the moment. This is likely an unusual use-case, but I find myself searching for SpamAssassin rule names for example and wanting to use them to locate any obvious spam in the logs that got through as ham, but this takes a lot of clicking around on ones that are already caught as spam for example.
-
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login
