Best Backup Technology + Small UI Wish for Separating Technologies vs. Providers

[timka]

Is there a technology you prefer for network-based deployments (where no physical/direct access to the server is possible)? For example, would you recommend SSHFS, S3-compatible storage, or something else for remote backup scenarios?
I would appreciate some personal opinions

Also, @girish regarding the backup setup: it might improve usability if the storage provider list were divided into technologies (self-hostable/generic protocols) and providers (cloud services). Perhaps a simple separator like --- could visually split the dropdown:

CIFS Mount
External/Local Disk (EXT4 or XFS)
EXT4 Disk
Filesystem
Filesystem (Mountpoint)
Minio
NFS Mount
S3 API Compatible (v4)
SSHFS Mount
XFS Disk
---
Amazon S3
Backblaze B2 (S3 API)
Cloudflare R2
Contabo Object Storage
DigitalOcean Spaces
Exoscale SOS
Google Cloud Storage
Hetzner Object Storage
IDrive e2
IONOS (Profitbricks)
Linode Object Storage
OVH Object Storage
Scaleway Object Storage
UpCloud Object Storage
Vultr Object Storage
Wasabi

[joseph]

AFAIK all of them work equally well. Maybe the only limitation is that NFS is best suited only for internal networks, because it doesn't have encryption (?).

[scooke]

Dividing into technologies and providers, I think, would continue to be confusing as it suggests that the providers DO NOT offer those technologies. Cloudron gets a lot of ppl new to self-hosting using it, which is a good thing, and the fewer the questions and confusions the better. The list, currently alphabetical, works perfectly fine.