Yes although you can also install collabora server inside Nextcloud which then allows you to use another app as a companion app on Cloudron. I guess it depends what you need to do / what functionality you think Nexcloud is missing. I'd say a webmail or a project management app are things I don't Nextcloud does too well but that's just for my use case.
avatar1024
Posts
-
Suggestions for partner app with Nextcloud? -
participants have to authenticate even with user_auth: false@MiroTalk said in participants have to authanticate even with user_auth: false:
@avatar1024 I will verify this as it is not the expected behavior.
Thank you for looking into it! Indeed according to the logic described in the doc (which I had read before trying) this is not what I expect should happen.
-
participants have to authenticate even with user_auth: falseI have host protected: true and user_auth: false. To create a room I login with a user set in the config.js file but then participants cannot access the room, they are also prompted to login.
If I deactivate host protected: true then room is accessible by all without any login.
Another user also reported the issue here.
-
Participants can't see eachother?I also have this issue with the p2p version. Participants cannot see each other.
-
How to modify the 'config.js' file?@Benoit said in How to modify the 'config.js' file?:
Hi @girish et @nebulon thanks for the mirotalk app ! I tried theses features https://docs.mirotalk.com/mirotalk-p2p/host-protection/#when-host_protected-is-enabled but it seems it doesn't work : i can authenticate my adminb account and create a room but invited participants can't join without authentication, the HOST_USER_AUTH=false parameter doesn't change this. is it normal ? Thanks again !
I have the same problem. Both with the p2p and the SFU version.
I have host protected: true and user_auth: false. To create a room I login with a user as a host and then participants cannot access the room, they are also prompted to login.
I created a separate thread for this issue.
-
Zulip - Powerful open source group chat@jdaviescoates said in Zulip - Powerful open source group chat:
$3.50/user/month just for that seems a bit steep
Indeeeed
-
Mailing list feature: basic moderation@girish said in Mailing list feature: basic moderation:
I also feel this workflow is very specific to your request. Usually, people want real lists and moderators don't want to manually forward emails. Just my 2c.
Perhaps it is specific to my workflow and I'm sure people would prefer real lists ...but I would imagine people would still prefer a basic / manual kind of moderation rather than none at all. Currently we have the option of either a list in which anyone can send to (including spammers), or a fully private list unreachable from external people. So I was looking for a technically simple way to achieve an in-between, even if basic and unperfect, for lack of a better solution likely to be available on Cloudron anytime soon (in a similar way when I proposed to implement private list, which it turned out was simple enough and so you - as always brilliantly - implemented the idea). But I get that in this case it's not so simple
Thank you for looking into it anyway and for providing feedback.
-
Mailing list feature: basic moderation@girish do you think this is technically feasible to implement without too much effort with how the Cloudron email / mailing list backend already work?
Btw I'm not suggesting you do it, but wonder if doable for someone with a basic knowledge on how Cloudron email backend work (which I sadly haven't got). -
Zulip - Powerful open source group chat@jagan said in Zulip - Powerful open source group chat:
Is there a plan only for the push notifications?
Yes there is: https://blog.zulip.com/2023/12/19/self-hosting-without-commercial-support/
Is there any major technical stoppers to get Zulip into Cloudron?
-
Mailing list feature: basic moderation@girish what you are describing is "proper" moderation whereas what I am proposing in that thread is only that for private lists, instead of having external email simply rejected, it gets sent to a chosen member of that list ("the moderator"), who can then choose to manually forward to the list or not. So there is no holding emails, provider UI, moderation rules, approval / rejection options, etc. needed.
The only UI element needed is the ability to choose the list member(s) who acts as the moderator(s) / receive emails from external senders.
-
Error installing Miro SFU@jdaviescoates said in Error installing Miro SFU:
PS I wonder if MiroP2P and MiroSFU should each have their own category?
What do you mean by category here?
-
Error installing Miro SFUJust for info, I've installed the sfu package without any problems so yes it is probably caused by another app using this.
PS: And I both MiroTalk P2P and MiroTalkSFU installed on the same server so no conflicts between the two.
-
Managing Mailing Lists on CloudronI thought one thing that would be nice is to be able to create a list from a Cloudron Group (i.e. mailing list that contains emails of everyone in a group and that gets updated each time you add or remove a user from a group). I don't know how the database works and how easy that might be to implement though...maybe someone knows?
-
Mailing list feature: basic moderationHello all,
According to this thread, it looks like proper mailing list app is not going to land on Cloudron anytime soon. I wonder if anyone with the knowledge of Cloudron email backend could help implement the above?...which is kind of a hack / workaround way to implement a basic moderation function to Cloudron mailing list feature.
-
Configure Haraka for Mailman3@girish Sure that's completely understandable, thanks for the reply.
Given that neither mailman or SYMPA seems straightforward to implement in Cloudron I might revive this thread to add a basic moderation function to Cloudron mailing list. I believe for security purpose this is the main missing feature and the proposed approached may not be too hard to implement with the current backend(?).
What users still won't get is the ability for members to subscribe and unsubscribe by themselves, but an admin can do that manually so at least it is doable.
Another thing that would be nice is to be able to create a list from a Cloudron Group (i.e. mailing list that contains emails of everyone in a group and that gets updated each time you add or remove a user from a group). I don't know how your database works and how easy that might be to implement. What do you reckon?
(Again this can be done manually so not as important as moderation, but just something that would be nice and possibly doable if the info are easily retrievable from the user database in the backend.) -
Configure Haraka for Mailman3@girish I wonder if there have been any progress since September that would help with this?
And if not, where should someone with coding skills start looking?
-
SSHFS: "failed to mount (inactive): read: Connection reset by peer"Thanks @girish for looking into this. This server is on Ubuntu 20.04.3 (fresh install from Netcup done recently). Also I can directly ssh into both the server and the box using that key, mounting only fails on Cloudron for some reason.
I guess it's not the end of the world and it might be an issue only in my instance, but you know that at least one user has had that problem (though it might have been the issue for the person who created that threat) in case more people report it
-
SSHFS: "failed to mount (inactive): read: Connection reset by peer"As I wrote the above I had a thought. I tried another SSH key to mount the backup storage as SSHFS (one that was also an authorised key in the box) and it worked!
-
The key that does not work is in format Ed25519 (weird because that key format is supported but the Storage Box and by the server as I can ssh into both with it). @girish, does Cloudron has issues with Ed25519? Even though I know when you tried here it worked.
-
The key that worked was in format RSA
@CRBear what kind of key are you using?
@girish problem solved on my end for SSHFS. The CIFS issue remains a mystery, but who cares
-
-
SSHFS: "failed to mount (inactive): read: Connection reset by peer"@girish Sorry issues might be getting mixed up. I'll try to clarify here.
-
when I try to connect by sotrage box for backup using SSHFS I get the same error as in this thread (even though the same box is connected via SSHFS in Volumes, so the issue is only there for backups).
-
Since I cannot backup via SSHFS, I tried mounting with CIFS. With CIFS it works for a few days and then I get backup error message:
Backup failed: copy exited with code 1 signal null.
When I go and check nothing seems wrong, and the storage box still looks mounted (green light) but I still need to press the remount button for backups to work again.
-
-
SSHFS: "failed to mount (inactive): read: Connection reset by peer"@girish said in SSHFS: "failed to mount (inactive): read: Connection reset by peer":
For some reason, the CIFS is not stable on your network
While this may be true, the odd thing is that Cloudron seems to think it's fine (green light). Isn't Cloudron supposed to periodically check the support is mounted?