Cloudron makes it easy to run web apps like WordPress, Nextcloud, GitLab on your server. Find out more or install now.


Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Bookmarks
  • Search
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

Cloudron Forum

Apps - Status | Demo | Docs | Install
LanhildL

Lanhild

@Lanhild
App Dev
About
Posts
218
Topics
48
Shares
0
Groups
1
Followers
5
Following
1

Posts

Recent Best Controversial

  • Implement a Down for Maintenance screen
    LanhildL Lanhild

    @jdaviescoates yes, exactly what I meant

    Feature Requests

  • Implement a Down for Maintenance screen
    LanhildL Lanhild

    @james I'd say both. Either way, the best way to explain this need's the following:

    Having the ability to set, from a list, which page to display when an app is down/off/in maintenance.

    Feature Requests

  • Authentik - Making authentication simple.
    LanhildL Lanhild

    @crazybrad

    1. For applications with networking related features, not uncommon
    2. Depends on the use case, as soon as you need LDAP or other protocols, an outposts necessary. Other features like SAML and OIDC will work without additional configuration.

    You can see authentik's documentation about this, it's well detailed.

    App Wishlist

  • Authentik - Making authentication simple.
    LanhildL Lanhild

    @crazybrad outposts are their own docker containers, created by the authentik worker, itself connected to the docker socket. I reckon we have an addon to connect an app to the socket, but iirc it's not recommended to use it.

    App Wishlist

  • Authentik - Making authentication simple.
    LanhildL Lanhild

    @crazybrad Core features such as outposts wouldn't work by packaging authentik as a Cloudron application.

    As mentioned earlier in this topic, authentik is the kind of application I'd suggest having installed on a separate server.

    App Wishlist

  • Implement a Down for Maintenance screen
    LanhildL Lanhild

    @girish Any thoughts about this?

    It's especially useful when you'd like to point users to a status page for which the URL differs with the app.

    Feature Requests

  • MySQL and Postgresql as standalone apps
    LanhildL Lanhild

    @chmod777 Archived because I don't maintain it anymore. The core of the app itself works (check through the branches first).

    Feature Requests

  • What's coming in 9.1
    LanhildL Lanhild

    @girish Should be opt-in. In cases where a Cloudron server has multiple developers, I don't want my developers to upload code to be built on my server

    Announcements

  • Publish the CloudronManifest schema
    LanhildL Lanhild

    @girish automatic schema validation by the IDE

    Feature Requests

  • Publish the CloudronManifest schema
    LanhildL Lanhild

    @joseph I know about this file. Maybe what I meant wasn't as clear as I thought 🙂

    What I'd like is to have the readily available JSON schema, online.

    For an example, see:

    • https://goauthentik.io/blueprints/schema.json
    • https://github.com/goauthentik/version
    Feature Requests

  • Publish the CloudronManifest schema
    LanhildL Lanhild

    It'd be useful for development purposes to have the CloudronManifest JSON schema published online.

    Feature Requests

  • Backups exiting with code 70
    LanhildL Lanhild

    @girish Increasing the task memory did it. Issue solved.

    Support backups

  • Backups exiting with code 70
    LanhildL Lanhild

    @girish Bumped the memory from the default (?) 1GB to 4GB. Right now, it seems like an app backup worked correctly. My Cloudron has quite a lot of stuff, so an global backup takes longer. I'll report back.

    Support backups

  • Backups exiting with code 70
    LanhildL Lanhild

    @girish There are no memory usage spikes coinciding with the timestamp of the error. Also, I have the same issue on another Cloudron.

    Where should I bump the memory of backup task? Trying it out.

    Support backups

  • Backups exiting with code 70
    LanhildL Lanhild

    I am using the s3-v4-compat (rsync) backup target, with OVH S3's product. All my system backups exit with a code 70. It seems like backups roll on for a bit, and then exit with said code.

    The same happens with app backups, making their updates impossible unless skipping the backup for them.

    This issue happened since the upgrade from 8.3.2 to 9.0.10

    Logs

    Nov 18 23:02:06 box:taskworker Terminated
    Nov 18 23:02:06 Exiting with code 70
    

    13e3656b-35ff-45a1-b908-4b2f0bf827d6-image.png

    We can see here with the "Upload finished" lines that the backup seemingly works for a while, but then exits.

    Troubleshooting Already Performed

    None, I can't control the backup process.

    System Details

    Cloudron version
    9.0.10

    Ubuntu version
    Ubuntu 22.04.4 LTS Linux 5.15.0-161-generic

    Vendor
    DigitalOcean

    CPU
    8 Core "DO-Premium-AMD"

    Memory
    33.65 GB RAM & 1.03 GB Swap

    Support backups

  • Uptime Kuma 2.0.0 package
    LanhildL Lanhild

    Fixed with https://github.com/louislam/uptime-kuma/releases/tag/2.0.2.

    Uptime Kuma

  • False positive for Google Chrome dangerous website flag
    LanhildL Lanhild

    As suspected, comes from upstream

    See https://github.com/louislam/uptime-kuma/issues/6223#issuecomment-3433199988

    Shouldn't be a Cloudron issue.

    Uptime Kuma

  • False positive for Google Chrome dangerous website flag
    LanhildL Lanhild

    Description

    See the issue @ https://github.com/louislam/uptime-kuma/issues/6223

    Basically, it's affecting a bunch of my apps on Cloudron as I have multiple of them on the same subdomain as my Uptime Kuma instance.

    I don't anything other than Cloudron applications on this subdomain, and none of them have been compromised.

    Steps to reproduce

    I updated Uptime Kuma to the version 2.0.1, and a few minutes after my subdomain got flagged.

    Logs

    N/A

    Troubleshooting Already Performed

    Went and requested a review from Google on their search console. Unfortunately, it's said it can take multiple days or weeks.

    I open this topic in the case an issue on Cloudron's side is known.

    System Details

    Generate Diagnostics Data

    v8.3.2 (Ubuntu 22.04.4 LTS)

    VendorDigitalOcean
    ProductDroplet
    CPU8 Core "DO-Premium-AMD"
    Memory33.65 GB RAM & 1.03 GB Swap
    Uptime17 days

    Uptime Kuma

  • Uptime Kuma 2.0.0 package
    LanhildL Lanhild

    @luckow I don't believe we have a MariaDB addon.

    Uptime Kuma

  • Uptime Kuma 2.0.0 package
    LanhildL Lanhild

    I've opened an issue upstream, as starting the update triggered a false positive alert from Google Chrome on my subdomain:

    • https://github.com/louislam/uptime-kuma/issues/6223
    Uptime Kuma
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Bookmarks
  • Search