What's coming in Cloudron 6.3
-
@d19dotca it's unlikely this week, we just had a call yesterday and decided to release what we have right now. So, we have already started testing and running e2e. I will leave a note on the progress here. I moved the security+email features to the next immediate release. As for the specific issue you are facing wrt not forwarding spam, let me see if the fix for that is easy and include it in this release itself.
-
@girish Oh sure, that'd be good. So there's going to be a bug fix version then I presume with what's already been done so far (such as 6.2.9 maybe or still 6.3.0)? And then email + security will be added to something like 6.4 instead if the next release is still 6.3?
--
Dustin Dauncey
www.d19.ca -
@d19dotca what's next is 6.3. the email + security will be 6.4 or maybe even part of cloudron 7. we are actually very close to multi-host with the changes in 6.3 !
BTW, about the spam fix, it's easy to check if an email is marked as spam and drop it (i.e based on spamassassin flags). However, since we don't have a place to quarantine yet, you will only see a eventlog entry that it's gone. Is this OK for the moment till we implement a monitorable mail queue?
-
As a final update to the mounting logic, it is also integrated into backups and restore logic.
-
-
@girish said in What's coming in Cloudron 6.3:
BTW, about the spam fix, it's easy to check if an email is marked as spam and drop it (i.e based on spamassassin flags). However, since we don't have a place to quarantine yet, you will only see a eventlog entry that it's gone. Is this OK for the moment till we implement a monitorable mail queue?
I think that's fine for now, but would it be possible to only affect mailing lists perhaps (assuming this change is mostly just temporary and probably will only really be used by me for the time being). I ask because I think if I were to just drop all messages marked as spam from all mail delivery completely, it'd be a detriment to my hosted mailboxes. The only place I want to disable sending spam mail is for mailing lists alone, if possible. But either way I guess, better than nothing
I need to ensure Gmail isn't going to block mail from my server completely just because the two addresses my mailing lists forward to are total magnets for spam. -
@girish said in What's coming in Cloudron 6.3:
Make email setup inside apps optional. This will make it possible to configure specific apps to use some external service for mail delivery directly and the Cloudron package won't touch their mail settings.
Volumes - make mounting easier by automating fstab/exports entriesThe email feature is something I think will help my use caase.
The volume feature is freaking phenomenal.You are all amazing!
-
Now that Cloudron is in the Vultr marketplace, it seemed the right time to implement Vultr DNS.
-
The last change remaining in 6.3 was related to notifications and most of it had landed yesterday.
-
Common issue is that a notification like a cert failure or restart required etc is essentially spammed to all admins and this causes great distress for all. So, we have now moved notifications from being per-user to be instead "system" level. The notification system is thus shared by the admin team and they can figure how to collaborate with other tools instead of Cloudron trying to have some sort of "read" indicator for each one of them.
-
Apart from failed backups and cert renewal failures, no emails are sent anymore. You have to visit the dashboard to see notifications since most of them are really not urgent or actionable.
-
Cert renewal notification + email is only raised if only 10 days are left to go for existing certificate to expire. The renewal itself will start 30 days in advance. So, we should see this very rarely from here on. Backup renewal notification will only be sent if 3 consecutive backups fail. This way we allow for "external services" to fail now and then without being too aggressive about notifying user.
There's more notes at https://git.cloudron.io/cloudron/box/-/commit/73917e95c9473ec8fc11216fd78607b0a256df7d . There's other minor visual changes as well, I will post a screenshot tomorrow once I complete the UI side.
-
-
The going is slow... Having to support 3 ubuntu versions takes a lot of testing time
The tests currently pass for ubuntu 18 and 20 but not for 16 yet. But we are close! Looks like failures are related to older versions of unbound not supporting sd_notify correctly.
-
@girish said in What's coming in Cloudron 6.3:
Having to support 3 ubuntu versions takes a lot of testing time
Maybe it's time to kill off support for Ubuntu 16?
--
Dustin Dauncey
www.d19.ca -
-
The tests are passing . Now just a whole lot of manual testing next week.
-
@d19dotca Manual testing of volume mounting revealed a lot of bugs, so we had to rework it a bit. The rework is done (as you can see from our git commits). I have started another e2e run just now.
Also, since we are now in the Vultr marketplace, we have gone ahead and added Vultr DNS and Vultr Object Storage as well in this release.
-
Looks like we are all set. There's a few known issues which we will fix immediately - https://git.cloudron.io/cloudron/box/-/issues?milestone_title=6.3.1 . I will stage the release tomorrow morning and leave a note here.
-
I pushed out 6.3.0. We hit a few migration issues, so it became 6.3.1. There are some minor issues being fixed, will be pushing 6.3.2 shortly. Please hold before you update to 6.3.
(to clarify, new installations get 6.3 but updates from 6.2->6.3 will give you a warning that it's unstable. please heed the warning
). -
@msbt it should mostly be OK but there might be some regressions. Did you happen to hit any? Let me know so I can get it sorted out for 6.3.3 . So far, I haven't heard of any from the new installations and all the Cloudron we have access to seem to have updated OK.
-
@girish the only things that happened were the logo from the branding disappearing and the app-update icons were misplaced (top right corner ). After updating to 6.3.2 the arrows are back where they belong (although on the left side, but this is by design I reckon). The logo I just reuploaded. Other than that it all seemed fine
