What's coming in 7.3
-
@avatar1024 work has already started to split the backup code into separate formats, but I don't know if we can add a restic backend for 7.3 as such.
-
-
@girish said in What's coming in 7.3:
External app links in Dashboard
How's this coming along? Any ETA on 7.3?
-
@marcusquinn ETA is end of this month.
As for external app links in Dashboard, it's already implemented. I will let @nebulon post some screenshots.
-
-
-
@girish said in What's coming in 7.3:
accessible only via VPN/Wireguard.
would that wireguard then also be hosted on Cloudron or is that a separate installation?
Both could probably have valid use cases. At work we already have wireguard, so I would want to use an existing, not cloudron based wireguard. For new installations wireguard being part of Cloudron word of course also be nice.
-
would that wireguard then also be hosted on Cloudron or is that a separate installation?
Don't have a specific plan here. As you said, both cases are valid, I think we will go with whatever is easily possible for the initial release. I will update here as we explore implementing this .
-
We have added the external app link support now as well. You can think of this as basically some bookmark system to allow putting plain URLs as links into the dashboard to provide organizations a way to use the Cloudron dashboard as a landing page for their users. The link visibility works the same way as for any other app and generally those links look just like apps on the Cloudron.
The UI is currently being finalized but looks mostly like this:
-
-
@fbartels Agreed that it seems odd (unless it's supported by health checks then I guess that makes sense). I kind of think that should just be empty where it currently says "running", or otherwise allow it to be customizable text so admins can make it say whatever they want such as "external" or "bookmark" or something like that.
-
Thanks for the feedback, I will revise the UI bits there. Currently we do not check health of the external url, but I had this in my stash for a release where we maybe focus a bit more on the healthcheck and uptime reporting, but I agree without that the "running" label really makes no sense.
-
@nebulon The running health-check makes sense to me, especially for other self-hosted apps on their own separate servers. Perhaps just a tick-box to enable?
What doesn't make sense to me is the Running text for non-admins though, the text has no utility to a user that expects all things to be running anyway, unless told otherwise, in which case then text can be shown to say whatever else might be happening that isn't running.
-