Cloudron makes it easy to run web apps like WordPress, Nextcloud, GitLab on your server. Find out more or install now.


Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Bookmarks
  • Search
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

Cloudron Forum

Apps - Status | Demo | Docs | Install
  1. Cloudron Forum
  2. Discuss
  3. Has anyone tried using Claude Code / Ralph Wiggum to package Cloudron apps?

Has anyone tried using Claude Code / Ralph Wiggum to package Cloudron apps?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Discuss
aipackagingapp development
20 Posts 6 Posters 301 Views 7 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • timconsidineT timconsidine

    @robi / @marcusquinn I haven't been using context7 MCP but I probably should - not been using any MCP, but again I should - will add to my list - just tell my TRAE to go check docs.cloudron.io/packaging

    scookeS Offline
    scookeS Offline
    scooke
    wrote last edited by
    #11

    @timconsidine That packaging link gives me a 404.... Ah, wait a minutes, context7 would just use the text that's under that link, correct? Like /addons, /cheat-sheet, /cli, /manifest, /publishing, /tutorial... and you just append the same command, use context7 at the end of the prompt in the Solo prompt box? I assume your prompt includes Cloudron somewhere. How verbose is it? Like, "Make an app following https://docs.cloudron.io/packaging/ for bookwyrm"? This stuff is fascinating.

    A life lived in fear is a life half-lived

    timconsidineT 1 Reply Last reply
    1
    • scookeS scooke

      @timconsidine That packaging link gives me a 404.... Ah, wait a minutes, context7 would just use the text that's under that link, correct? Like /addons, /cheat-sheet, /cli, /manifest, /publishing, /tutorial... and you just append the same command, use context7 at the end of the prompt in the Solo prompt box? I assume your prompt includes Cloudron somewhere. How verbose is it? Like, "Make an app following https://docs.cloudron.io/packaging/ for bookwyrm"? This stuff is fascinating.

      timconsidineT Offline
      timconsidineT Offline
      timconsidine
      App Dev
      wrote last edited by
      #12

      @scooke I haven't got round to using context7 yet.

      The packaging link was typed off the top of my head.
      I think the main problem is that there is not a "root" page for the packaging docs. IMO Cloudron should create one.

      Let me investigate a bit more later (fighting Zoneminder packaging at the moment)

      Indie app dev, scratching my itches, lover of Cloudron PaaS

      1 Reply Last reply
      1
      • timconsidineT Offline
        timconsidineT Offline
        timconsidine
        App Dev
        wrote last edited by timconsidine
        #13

        @scooke I checked out context7 - looks good !
        thank you @marcusquinn for bringing it to all our attention

        easy sign up and a free plan for 1,000 requests per month (don't know how quickly that gets consumed in practice)

        @scooke, it seems someone already ingested docs.cloudron.io into context7 (@loudlemur raised this previously, although I missed that post)

        so there's effectively no setup to do. TRAE supports context7 from its Marketplace (no cost) and it seems context7 supports all the major coding assistants (if TRAE is not your thing).

        I am using TRAE Pro plan, not the SOLO mode - thinking about subscribing for SOLO but currently the Pro plan Builder (now Builder with MCP option) is rocking it for me.

        and yes, I'm guessing that a simple prompt in TRAE AI chat after adding the context7 MCP might work :
        "use context7 to review cloudron docs and help me package bookwyrm (GitHub : github.com/<dev>/<app>) for deployment on Cloudron"

        I will need to check it out further.
        After my success with packaging 2 complex apps Zoneminder and Seafile, I'm keen to see what other "impossible" Wishlist items can be ticked off.

        EDIT : and it would be wise to add a rule in your AI assistant to use context7 without asking :

        Always use Context7 MCP when I need library/API documentation, code generation, setup or configuration steps without me having to explicitly ask.

        Indie app dev, scratching my itches, lover of Cloudron PaaS

        marcusquinnM 1 Reply Last reply
        2
        • timconsidineT timconsidine

          @scooke I checked out context7 - looks good !
          thank you @marcusquinn for bringing it to all our attention

          easy sign up and a free plan for 1,000 requests per month (don't know how quickly that gets consumed in practice)

          @scooke, it seems someone already ingested docs.cloudron.io into context7 (@loudlemur raised this previously, although I missed that post)

          so there's effectively no setup to do. TRAE supports context7 from its Marketplace (no cost) and it seems context7 supports all the major coding assistants (if TRAE is not your thing).

          I am using TRAE Pro plan, not the SOLO mode - thinking about subscribing for SOLO but currently the Pro plan Builder (now Builder with MCP option) is rocking it for me.

          and yes, I'm guessing that a simple prompt in TRAE AI chat after adding the context7 MCP might work :
          "use context7 to review cloudron docs and help me package bookwyrm (GitHub : github.com/<dev>/<app>) for deployment on Cloudron"

          I will need to check it out further.
          After my success with packaging 2 complex apps Zoneminder and Seafile, I'm keen to see what other "impossible" Wishlist items can be ticked off.

          EDIT : and it would be wise to add a rule in your AI assistant to use context7 without asking :

          Always use Context7 MCP when I need library/API documentation, code generation, setup or configuration steps without me having to explicitly ask.

          marcusquinnM Offline
          marcusquinnM Offline
          marcusquinn
          wrote last edited by
          #14

          @timconsidine I'm guessing TRAE is using Sonnet to make it so cheap?

          Have you tried Opus 4.5? I'm hooked on opencode.ai + Claude Max.

          Web Design & Development: https://www.evergreen.je
          Technology & Apps: https://www.marcusquinn.com

          timconsidineT 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • robiR Offline
            robiR Offline
            robi
            wrote last edited by
            #15

            This just in: The Full Nelson - Beyond Ralph
            https://github.com/jusgou/nelson

            Conscious tech

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • marcusquinnM marcusquinn

              @timconsidine I'm guessing TRAE is using Sonnet to make it so cheap?

              Have you tried Opus 4.5? I'm hooked on opencode.ai + Claude Max.

              timconsidineT Offline
              timconsidineT Offline
              timconsidine
              App Dev
              wrote last edited by timconsidine
              #16

              @marcusquinn to be honest, I am not sure what model is used because I use it on Auto. Allegedly that means they use the best for the task.

              I think they don't use Anthropic, but you can configure access by your own subscription.

              Screenshot 2026-01-25 at 09.38.51.png

              Looking into opencode.ai today

              Indie app dev, scratching my itches, lover of Cloudron PaaS

              marcusquinnM 1 Reply Last reply
              1
              • timconsidineT timconsidine

                @marcusquinn to be honest, I am not sure what model is used because I use it on Auto. Allegedly that means they use the best for the task.

                I think they don't use Anthropic, but you can configure access by your own subscription.

                Screenshot 2026-01-25 at 09.38.51.png

                Looking into opencode.ai today

                marcusquinnM Offline
                marcusquinnM Offline
                marcusquinn
                wrote last edited by
                #17

                @timconsidine cool. 5.2 Codex has been the only ones from those i can trust with coding, almost as good as Opus 4.5, just slower.

                I think you'll like. You might like my https://aidevops.sh to give it a full devops lifecycle for coding with proper git and worktree usage. Must saver for parallel work on the same repo, and then connect up all the code auditing tools on your repo for a postflight check and refinement.

                Web Design & Development: https://www.evergreen.je
                Technology & Apps: https://www.marcusquinn.com

                1 Reply Last reply
                1
                • timconsidineT Offline
                  timconsidineT Offline
                  timconsidine
                  App Dev
                  wrote last edited by
                  #18

                  Looking into opencode.ai today

                  opencode was a lot easier to set up than Claude Code
                  And it looks nicer
                  Thank you @marcusquinn

                  Looking at aidevops ...

                  Indie app dev, scratching my itches, lover of Cloudron PaaS

                  marcusquinnM 1 Reply Last reply
                  1
                  • timconsidineT timconsidine

                    Looking into opencode.ai today

                    opencode was a lot easier to set up than Claude Code
                    And it looks nicer
                    Thank you @marcusquinn

                    Looking at aidevops ...

                    marcusquinnM Offline
                    marcusquinnM Offline
                    marcusquinn
                    wrote last edited by
                    #19

                    @timconsidine open-source wins again 🙂

                    Web Design & Development: https://www.evergreen.je
                    Technology & Apps: https://www.marcusquinn.com

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    3
                    • nebulonN Offline
                      nebulonN Offline
                      nebulon
                      Staff
                      wrote last edited by
                      #20

                      I can second this, opencode was pretty straightforwards to get to work against an ollama running on a different machine locally. However my test system is absolutely too old to make proper use of it. At least I know it is theoretically possible if I would get a proper setup 🙂

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      1
                      Reply
                      • Reply as topic
                      Log in to reply
                      • Oldest to Newest
                      • Newest to Oldest
                      • Most Votes


                      • Login

                      • Don't have an account? Register

                      • Login or register to search.
                      • First post
                        Last post
                      0
                      • Categories
                      • Recent
                      • Tags
                      • Popular
                      • Bookmarks
                      • Search