Cloudron Forum

Yes, unless we actively track user activity in the dashboard, this is quite useless when that browser session had a still valid accessToken or OpenID session. Same goes for apps, only here the platform has even less control and no way to track unless we would inject some javascript, which we really shouldn't

@girish aftering giving both redis and the app a load more memory the import worked fine. I don't know why I didn't just try that before to be honest. I'm not sure how it managed to half-work before so that the apps was running and the import seemed to have worked, but without the users, but I've just done the back import again and the users have re-appeared, so panic over. Phew.

Depends on your use case / what apps you want to provide for your users. For best practice, I avoid the "Visible to all users on this Cloudron" option and remove all assigned groups from a user before deactivating the account. In case of Nextcloud for example, Cloudron groups can be used within the app to give permissions to shares and features. Certain apps can also be configured to give every user that is able to log in a certain amount of permissions (like Nextcloud Auto Groups or specific role managment in Bookstack). I have a "base" group (like <orgname>) giving normal access to apps like Matrix/Element, Nextcloud and Bockstack. Below that I have a group "<orgname>-internal" that give access to more specific apps like Freescout or Kimai. To go even further you can do <orgname>-<department> but for most apps you have to specify user permissions in addition. However it is useful to limit app access by Cloudron groups so users don't end up in a spot where they don't have permissions or no role to fulfill.

@girish said in Adding a new user with _ in their username doesn't work and generates no errors/ warnings/ messages: I tried this now and see a message: guess you must be running a patched/ fixed version?

@ruihildt yeah I guess horizontal scaling is not the correct term for what I meant. I believe, viewing one Cloudron instance (which may consist of multiple servers in the future) for one organization is what we are aiming for. Not the scaling for multi-tenancy of organizations (the scaling more applicable for SaaS offerings)

Hi there, thanks for the kind words I was about to add presentator to our app app request list, however it was already there at https://forum.cloudron.io/topic/1138/presentator-design-collaboration-and-presentation-platform/2?_=1591338888936 Please leave a comment there to indicate interest, that will help us gauge a bit what to look at next.