What's coming in 6.1
-
@girish quick question about :
proxyAuth: add 2fa
How's this gonna work with the basic-auth? Or is it just gonna be ignored for basic auth? (in this case, it does not really bring any additional security)
-
@mehdi Currently, it is ignored. Do you think we should maybe disable password validation with basic auth and make it only work with app passwords?
@girish said in What's coming in 6.1:
@mehdi Currently, it is ignored. Do you think we should maybe disable password validation with basic auth and make it only work with app passwords?
That's an interesting idea. Another possible way would be to only allow BasicAuth if explicitely asked for in the Manifest. It would need a minor change for the apps that need it, but it's totally acceptable IMO. (both options are not exclusive :))
-
@girish said in What's coming in 6.1:
@mehdi Currently, it is ignored. Do you think we should maybe disable password validation with basic auth and make it only work with app passwords?
That's an interesting idea. Another possible way would be to only allow BasicAuth if explicitely asked for in the Manifest. It would need a minor change for the apps that need it, but it's totally acceptable IMO. (both options are not exclusive :))
-
@girish Just to double-check, the
proxyAuthchanges also include the path-exclusion logic, right? -
6.1 is out now. As always, we will roll out slowly since there are many changes. We are already aware of a small breakage that affected one server, so we will make a 6.1.1 soon till we find out any other issues. The breakage will manifest itself in the UI as "Waiting for platform to update" when installing an app or updating an app. If you hit this, let us know here, so we can know how common it is but most of the servers we control updated fine.
-
6.1 is out now. As always, we will roll out slowly since there are many changes. We are already aware of a small breakage that affected one server, so we will make a 6.1.1 soon till we find out any other issues. The breakage will manifest itself in the UI as "Waiting for platform to update" when installing an app or updating an app. If you hit this, let us know here, so we can know how common it is but most of the servers we control updated fine.
-
@girish All instances updated without a prob - but - no domain aliases?
-
@marcusquinn It has to be enabled in the apps on case by case basis. I pushed out an update to surfer a few minutes back, if you want to see how the UI looks. EspoCRM update is coming up shortly. And WordPress afterwards.
-
@girish Ahh, perfect. Yeah could do with soon as I kinda promised some people
-
@marcusquinn Just fixing the tests, so should be out today (espocrm).
@girish Just tested this for ya. Maybe a typo in there?
Web Design https://www.evergreen.je
Development https://brandlight.org
Life https://marcusquinn.com -
@girish Just tested this for ya. Maybe a typo in there?
-
Forgive me if I missed it in the forums, but I just updated to 6.1.1 and noticed in System Info page that it no longer shows how much disk space each app is consuming. Is this expected behaviour? I sort of liked how I could point to individual apps disk space usage. Of course when you run a ton it becomes a long list but maybe the apps could be collapsable instead of just gone? lol. Just my two cents anyways if the move to hide them was intentional.
--
Dustin Dauncey
www.d19.ca -
Forgive me if I missed it in the forums, but I just updated to 6.1.1 and noticed in System Info page that it no longer shows how much disk space each app is consuming. Is this expected behaviour? I sort of liked how I could point to individual apps disk space usage. Of course when you run a ton it becomes a long list but maybe the apps could be collapsable instead of just gone? lol. Just my two cents anyways if the move to hide them was intentional.
