Cloudron Forum

@IniBudi I'm using a * checks password manager * 128 character Passwort. I think yours will work too.

@jayonrails Sure:

Storage Provider: SSHFS Mount
Server IP or Hostname (sshfs): uxxxxxx.your-storagebox.de
Remote Directory (sshfs): /home
Port: 23
User: uxxxxxx-sub2 # I use a sub account
Private Key: set # Make sure to upload the respective public key to the directory
Prefix: empty
Storage Format: rsync
Encryption Password (optional): set

@poeti8 Shipping fast, I'm digging the customizability!

@p44 said in [OT] Hetzner Box night backup takes 6 hours?!:

@jdaviescoates Interesting... I have to say that I have backup on two different data centers, from Nuremberg to Helsinki

I do the same and have excellent performance. Try SSH

@p44 Did you try SSH yet?

@p44 How and what did you mount here? Looks like you are using an extra volume in the virtual environment as a backup solution. Personally I use a storage box mounted via SSH which is significantly cheaper and pretty fast.

@SailReal Not a problem per se but an additional app that requires packaging

@scooke said in What's coming in Cloudron 9:

@potemkin_ai For fwiw, I immediately distrust companies passing off other's tech as their own. I'm not sure to what degree you refer to when you ask for whitelabeling. If you sell services someone and they understand you are using Cloudron (who in turn is using other available software), and the whitelabeling you mean refers to them paying to be able to put their Company Name where they need it (because Cloudron licencing and tech has made that possible)... is one thing. But, it's another to present yourself as though whatever-makes-it-run has been made by your own hands and not by the Cloudron team, and customers buy your web service because it's made by your own hands, and they still get to put their own company name on it because you allow them too... that's sneaky. Deceptive. Companies that do this are not trustworthy.

Let me emphasize that I'm using the 3rd person "you", and not specifically you @potemkin_ai, especially since I don't know your approach. I'm just sharing my own personal perspective as consumer.

Adding to what @humptydumpty explained, consider the following scenario as a use case:

You are responsible for IT administration in a small organization, so you set up various services via a cloudron instance. But now you have to explain to people you are onboarding (in addition to all the stuff and how it works) what cloudron is (good luck with that) and what it has to do with the cloud you are using.

Whitelabeling solves this by not adding extra terms to user facing interfaces (i.e. log in with Cloudron).

BTW it seems to automatically recognize any audio file you throw at it. Either via Microphone or file upload and process TTS locally before passing it on to the selected model. Logs and graphs are pretty clear about this. Documentation however is not lol.

@nebulon I see, thanks for the clarification

@stevespaw said in Move backup location of mysqldump to volume:

OK now I will show my lack of linux. I did this all as root. What do I do now? How do I fix this permission issue? Thanks.

sudo chown -R yellowtent /path/to/directory

It would be nice to be able to change the logo of the instance. As per documentation, the logo is served from /web/public (changing the constants in /packages/lib/constants.ts is required. Additional instance wide theming is possible in apps/web/styles/globals.css

@humptydumpty @poeti8 Same here. Another big reason was the customizability. I need to be able to choose a favicon and control the design and content of the landing page.

@SailReal Would be nice but doesn't it have keycloak dependencies?

@necrevistonnezr Yes I know but I have users who will insist on this. And partial wildcards are still better than complete ones

@humptydumpty Oh I didn't know you could use an Asterix for partial wildcards. That's a neat feature

@humptydumpty Not my setup so don't ask me for why not alias lol What's the difference between wildcard and catch-all? On a sidenote: some spam might not fill in the "to". Not sure if this is checking for the header content or arriving address

@humptydumpty Just checked, didn't work, reverted to the catch all. Enabling it and creating this filter did do the trick though.

@humptydumpty Maybe worth a try. Currently it doesn't exist and is being delivered through the catch-all

Is there a way to block all mail going to a specific address?