Cloudron Forum

@necrevistonnezr said in How to remove all mail folder?:

Another thing is that - as usual with Apple - there’s no way to adjust or reset such suggestions. Even without the „all mail“ folder, it was hit & miss. And why would a folder that has been added later override all previously learned suggestions? It’s just stupid.
(BTW, the same goes for login/password suggestions in Safari, even when using Bitwarden - for my Cloudron site, Safari suggests 30 login / password combinations that are out of date. No way to reset that).

I hear you. Apple always does everything the apple way. In this case I think its not really related to "learning". I think its more of a scan and match system. You receive a mail and the mail app is looking up for the folder containing the most mails with the given sender. So in case of Amazon apps there are like two options: The Amazon folder and the all mail folder. As I may have missed a few mails in the past and probably just moved them into the archive, there may be a slightly higher amount of mails in the all mail folder. Also I tend to use folders like "cancellations" or "payments" which may also contain Amazon mails.

The same goes for office mails. The same sender (f.g. boss@work) may end up in folder "Project A" and Project "B", according to its content and topic. But both mails will be found in "all mail". So no matter what, the all mail folder will - due to its nature - always have the biggest and max. possible amount of mails from every given sender and therefor get the highest "rank" from Apple Mail.

At least thats what I assume.

@necrevistonnezr said in How to remove all mail folder?:

„messed up“?

Well.. maybe „messed up suggestions“ would be a better phrase. iOS makes suggestions for actions according folders. Like 1-click-move of a YouTube mail into the YouTube folder, new Amazon mail into Amazon folder and so on. Since I upgraded and the all mail folder appeared, iOS and iPadOS just suggests to move every mail into this folder. Non of the quick actions to move a mail work anymore. I have to dig through my list of folders and pick every folder by hand.

Hi all

As the new (virtual) all mail folder messed up my iOS Mail I am looking for an option to turn it off as it was before. Where can I find such option?

Thanks a lot

Update solved the problem. Will dig into the monitoring problem, which indeed seems to be not cloudron related. Thank you for the reply.

Just in case those information are needed:

Its a Ryzen 7 3700X, OS running on a Samsung MZVL21T0HCLR-00B00 1 TB NVMe and RAID 1 array contains 2x HGST HUH721010AL 10TB HDD

I just realized that the disk usage tool within cloudron doesn't provide any data as well. No matter how often I click on refresh or Analyze Disk, nothing happens.

I checked logs and it shows the following:

Sep 03 10:20:49 box:shell startTask (stdout): Service box-task-1559 failed to run
Sep 03 10:20:49 box:shell startTask (stdout): Service box-task-1559 finished with exit code 1
Sep 03 10:20:49 box:shell startTask code: 1, signal: null
Sep 03 10:20:49 box:tasks startTask: 1559 completed with code 1
Sep 03 10:20:49 box:tasks startTask: 1559 done. error: { stack: "TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'contents')\n" + ' at getDisks (/home/yellowtent/box/src/system.js:108:36)\n' + ' at process.processTicksAndRejections (node:internal/process/task_queues:95:5)\n' + ' at async updateDiskUsage (/home/yellowtent/box/src/system.js:208:19)', message: "Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'contents')" }
Sep 03 10:20:50 box:apphealthmonitor app health: 22 running / 0 stopped / 0 unresponsive
Sep 03 10:20:50 box:apphealthmonitor app health: 22 running / 0 stopped / 0 unresponsive
Sep 03 10:21:00 box:apphealthmonitor app health: 22 running / 0 stopped / 0 unresponsive
Sep 03 10:21:00 box:apphealthmonitor app health: 22 running / 0 stopped / 0 unresponsive

Whenever I click on Analyze Disk again, it comes up with this:

Sep 03 10:25:29 box:shell startTask (stdout): Service box-task-1560 failed to run
Sep 03 10:25:29 box:shell startTask (stdout): Service box-task-1560 finished with exit code 1
Sep 03 10:25:29 box:shell startTask code: 1, signal: null
Sep 03 10:25:29 box:tasks startTask: 1560 completed with code 1
Sep 03 10:25:29 box:tasks startTask: 1560 done. error: { stack: "TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'contents')\n" + ' at getDisks (/home/yellowtent/box/src/system.js:108:36)\n' + ' at process.processTicksAndRejections (node:internal/process/task_queues:95:5)\n' + ' at async updateDiskUsage (/home/yellowtent/box/src/system.js:208:19)', message: "Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'contents')" }
Sep 03 10:25:30 box:apphealthmonitor app health: 22 running / 0 stopped / 0 unresponsive
Sep 03 10:25:30 box:apphealthmonitor app health: 22 running / 0 stopped / 0 unresponsive
Sep 03 10:25:38 box:scheduler could not run task housekeeping : App not found

Hello

Moved my cloudron instance to a new sever. Cloudron/OS is running on nvme and I added a RAID1 array of 2 HDD. Was trying to set up an email alert for RAID monitoring using

mdadm --monitor --scan --daemonize --mail=mailaddress

Server responded with:

Only one autorebuild process allowed in scan mode, aborting

Is this due to cloudron somehow monitoring the raid or isn't this related to cloudron at all? Actually I don't really care how the RAID array is beeing monitored, as long as I get some kind of notification in case the RAID array fails due to a drive failure.

Thanks a lot

@3246 said in [ Guide] How to install Cloudron/Nextcloud with LUKS full disk encryption on Hetzner cloud server:

@Stardenver yes it is. I also have it running on baremetal at home/office.

My new set up has a main drive that's encrypted and another for local backups, which is also encrypted but unlocks after decrypting the main boot/data drive.

Happy to expand on this if folks find it useful

Thanks again for your setup guide. Just got a new server and its up and running. May I ask how you'd setup your system, so that additional drives are also encrypted and unlock after decrypting the main drive?

@girish said in Whats Django Adminpanel and how to access it?:

python3 manage.py createsuperuser

This one worked. Logged in with new account and gave my main account the missing permissions.

Thank you very much

Hi all

Using Paperless-ngx but never really changed any settings. It just worked great for me out of the box. First thing I did was to create another account and making it superuser. I then erased the auto-created admin account.

Today I was playing around with some settings and realized there is a "Django Adminpanel" which I can't access. Is it because I erased the auto created admin account? How can I get access to it and whats its suppose? Any important settings there?

Thanks a lot and greetings from Germany
Boris

@necrevistonnezr said in Reddit strike:

I still don't believe the federated system is the answer. It's just too complicated for the average user and gets in the way of the interesting exchanges you had on reddit.
Example: Stuff is on one server but not on the other - you want to add it, but it's not fully federated or suddenly - as in the case of beehaw - not federated anymore. It's just annoying.

Well, maybe when you mixe up some different kind of "social networks" using activity pub. I learned that people actually tend to adapt it very quick and successful, once you allow them to stay within some sort of well known environment. So its not that hard to convince someone to give Mastodon a try, as long as you keep it within Mastodon, at least for the beginning. People see it as some sort of independent Twitter. Things get confusing for people when you try to talk them into multi-network-stuff. Like mixing Mastodon and Peertube or Pixelfed. Gets very confusing.

I know what you mean and I understand and faced this problem, but there are several ways to avoid confusing people right at the beginning.

@Kubernetes said in Reddit strike:

@Stardenver yes it is, but not if you make one part of the fediverse private?

I believe that "privat" means "closed for registration". So its not really private but access to those small or single user instances is limited. At least thats what I understand.

@Kubernetes said in Reddit strike:

@robi Probably, but that is different from the intention of the service

But isn't decentralization the whole point of the fediverse? From my understanding thats exactly the intention of the service. You don't need to join a specific community to participate. You can read and comment everywhere, no matter what instance you are coming from.

Prepare for another run onto the Fediverse.

That's what I call an answer
Thank you very much. Very helpful and my question is answered.

Hi all

Sorry, didn't know how to phrase it any better. I don't really understand how/if Cloudron is utilizing Multi-CPU-Cores. So I am wondering if - generally speaking - a server running multiple cores but on a lower frequency is better than a CPU with less cores but a higher frequency. What is more important - number of cores or frequency per core, even if less cores?

Sorry for any confusion - not a native english speaker.

Thanks a lot

@girish said in Best way/protocol to mount Hetzner Storage Box?:

I think at the moment CIFS is pretty much the only way. SSHFS is not maintained anymore and WebDAVfs is also one of those flaky file systems. Ideally, they should support maybe NFS but they don't.

Thank you. That answered my question.

Hi all

Using 2 Hetzner Storage Boxes for backups and to extend storage. Mounted both as CIFS, but as Hetzner offers several ways (webdav, cifs/samba, ssh, etc) I am wondering if cifs is the best way to mount them. What do you guys use/recommend and why?

Thanks a lot

@Kubernetes said in Nextcloud using much too much storage:

And how did you solve it? Did you just delete the files_version folder content? Is that a safe action?

Well.. nothing happened. I just erased those versions of files I didnt use anymore. In my case I attached an external storage box and removed it later. So I simply erased the folders from within the files_version folder that were on that storage.

Solved it. There is a files_version folder and it was full