Cloudron makes it easy to run web apps like WordPress, Nextcloud, GitLab on your server. Find out more or install now.


Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Bookmarks
  • Search
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

Cloudron Forum

Apps | Demo | Docs | Install
  1. Cloudron Forum
  2. App Wishlist
  3. HumHub - social network software

HumHub - social network software

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Solved App Wishlist
126 Posts 17 Posters 53.0k Views 16 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • ? A Former User

    Encountering a snag:

    The ONLYOFFICE integration seems to fail to send the JWT token to an ONLYOFFICE instance. My best guess rn is its an issue with apache -> nginx -> ONLYOFFICE. Is anyone else more familiar with this sort of reverse proxy issue?

    Edit: Fixed it. Testing and pushing a new release.

    Edit 2: I am tempted to leave updating to the app, similar to Wordpress Developer Edition. I auto install the Updater module. If @staff want to take a look at this let me know. Repo is here: https://git.atridad.dev/CTPR/cloudron-humhub-app. It was a sponsored app. If you need an instance to take a look at it let me know via a direct message and I can let you in @staff.

    girishG Offline
    girishG Offline
    girish
    Staff
    wrote on last edited by
    #45

    @atrilahiji ah, great stuff! Ideally, the app shouldn't update itself and the code should be readonly. Is that possible? It's best to keep updates consistent i.e from Cloudron dashboard.

    ? 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • girishG girish

      @atrilahiji ah, great stuff! Ideally, the app shouldn't update itself and the code should be readonly. Is that possible? It's best to keep updates consistent i.e from Cloudron dashboard.

      ? Offline
      ? Offline
      A Former User
      wrote on last edited by
      #46

      @girish I can definitely try. Much like Moodle, it has a lot of plugins or "modules" people use. I think in this instance they are all in a single directory though. I'll take a look.

      girishG 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • ? A Former User

        @girish I can definitely try. Much like Moodle, it has a lot of plugins or "modules" people use. I think in this instance they are all in a single directory though. I'll take a look.

        girishG Offline
        girishG Offline
        girish
        Staff
        wrote on last edited by
        #47

        @atrilahiji thanks! let me know if you hit any bumps and I can take a look as well.

        ? 2 Replies Last reply
        1
        • girishG girish

          @atrilahiji thanks! let me know if you hit any bumps and I can take a look as well.

          ? Offline
          ? Offline
          A Former User
          wrote on last edited by
          #48

          @girish Sure, thanks! I'll shuffle some things around in the package and see what I can do. My hope is I can just symlink everything that is needed in a migration to /app/data, which will also make updates a lot easier.

          1 Reply Last reply
          1
          • girishG girish

            @atrilahiji thanks! let me know if you hit any bumps and I can take a look as well.

            ? Offline
            ? Offline
            A Former User
            wrote on last edited by A Former User
            #49

            @girish Actually, I just thought of something. If the modules folder is symlinked and the app is expecting to write to the modules folder in /app/code, it will error right? I imagine it wouldn't just look at the actual folder in /app/data. The trouble here is there is a "module store" of sorts built right into the app.

            girishG 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • ? A Former User

              @girish Actually, I just thought of something. If the modules folder is symlinked and the app is expecting to write to the modules folder in /app/code, it will error right? I imagine it wouldn't just look at the actual folder in /app/data. The trouble here is there is a "module store" of sorts built right into the app.

              girishG Offline
              girishG Offline
              girish
              Staff
              wrote on last edited by
              #50

              @atrilahiji maybe you can symlink /app/code/modules to /app/data/modules and that way it will become writable.

              To give a high level idea, let's say humhub app comes with some default modules. Then, in Dockerfile, you would move them to some other location like:

              RUN mv /app/code/modules /app/code/modules_orig && ln -s /app/data/modules /app/code/modules

              Then in start.sh:

              mkdir -p /app/code/modules
              cp -r /app/code/modules_orig/* /app/data/modules
              

              In many apps, instead of the blind copy above, we try to symlink each "module". So, there will be a symlink from /app/data/modules/x to /app/code/modules_orig/x . This sometimes works or not depending on the app. But hopefully you get the idea!

              ? 2 Replies Last reply
              2
              • girishG girish

                @atrilahiji maybe you can symlink /app/code/modules to /app/data/modules and that way it will become writable.

                To give a high level idea, let's say humhub app comes with some default modules. Then, in Dockerfile, you would move them to some other location like:

                RUN mv /app/code/modules /app/code/modules_orig && ln -s /app/data/modules /app/code/modules

                Then in start.sh:

                mkdir -p /app/code/modules
                cp -r /app/code/modules_orig/* /app/data/modules
                

                In many apps, instead of the blind copy above, we try to symlink each "module". So, there will be a symlink from /app/data/modules/x to /app/code/modules_orig/x . This sometimes works or not depending on the app. But hopefully you get the idea!

                ? Offline
                ? Offline
                A Former User
                wrote on last edited by
                #51

                @girish my confusion here is if the app still tries to write to /app/code/modules it would hit permissions issues no?

                fbartelsF 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • girishG girish

                  @atrilahiji maybe you can symlink /app/code/modules to /app/data/modules and that way it will become writable.

                  To give a high level idea, let's say humhub app comes with some default modules. Then, in Dockerfile, you would move them to some other location like:

                  RUN mv /app/code/modules /app/code/modules_orig && ln -s /app/data/modules /app/code/modules

                  Then in start.sh:

                  mkdir -p /app/code/modules
                  cp -r /app/code/modules_orig/* /app/data/modules
                  

                  In many apps, instead of the blind copy above, we try to symlink each "module". So, there will be a symlink from /app/data/modules/x to /app/code/modules_orig/x . This sometimes works or not depending on the app. But hopefully you get the idea!

                  ? Offline
                  ? Offline
                  A Former User
                  wrote on last edited by A Former User
                  #52

                  @girish Running into issues here: https://docs.humhub.org/docs/admin/installation/#file-permissions

                  There appears to be no way to configure where Hubhub looks for those files, so it will just keep trying to write to the symlink in /app/code and fail. In fact, you cant even get the site to load after installation without having the assets directory writable. This is something it has to do on startup. I can still make an update script for this, but I think it will have to sit in /app/data just based on how this was written. Unless I'm missing something?

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • ? A Former User

                    @girish my confusion here is if the app still tries to write to /app/code/modules it would hit permissions issues no?

                    fbartelsF Offline
                    fbartelsF Offline
                    fbartels
                    App Dev
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #53

                    @atrilahiji said in HumHub - social network software:

                    if the app still tries to write to /app/code/modules it would hit permissions issues no?

                    no, that should not be the case (at least when the symlinked dir has proper permissions for this).

                    ? 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • fbartelsF fbartels

                      @atrilahiji said in HumHub - social network software:

                      if the app still tries to write to /app/code/modules it would hit permissions issues no?

                      no, that should not be the case (at least when the symlinked dir has proper permissions for this).

                      ? Offline
                      ? Offline
                      A Former User
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #54

                      @fbartels Weird... it seemed to think it didn't have permission to write...

                      ? 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • ? A Former User

                        @fbartels Weird... it seemed to think it didn't have permission to write...

                        ? Offline
                        ? Offline
                        A Former User
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #55

                        319b926a-e20f-46d8-973d-27592726f97b-image.png

                        scookeS fbartelsF 2 Replies Last reply
                        1
                        • ? A Former User

                          319b926a-e20f-46d8-973d-27592726f97b-image.png

                          scookeS Offline
                          scookeS Offline
                          scooke
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #56

                          @atrilahiji Never stop never stopping! You're doing great!

                          A life lived in fear is a life half-lived

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          1
                          • ? A Former User

                            319b926a-e20f-46d8-973d-27592726f97b-image.png

                            fbartelsF Offline
                            fbartelsF Offline
                            fbartels
                            App Dev
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #57

                            @atrilahiji can you push your current wip? I'd like to give the code a look.

                            ? 1 Reply Last reply
                            1
                            • fbartelsF fbartels

                              @atrilahiji can you push your current wip? I'd like to give the code a look.

                              ? Offline
                              ? Offline
                              A Former User
                              wrote on last edited by A Former User
                              #58

                              @fbartels Sure thing: https://git.atridad.dev/alt-ron/cloudron-humhub-app/-/tree/harden-app-code

                              Thanks! I'm convinced this is 1) impossible or 2) something so simple yet I have not noticed it somehow

                              fbartelsF 1 Reply Last reply
                              1
                              • ? A Former User

                                @fbartels Sure thing: https://git.atridad.dev/alt-ron/cloudron-humhub-app/-/tree/harden-app-code

                                Thanks! I'm convinced this is 1) impossible or 2) something so simple yet I have not noticed it somehow

                                fbartelsF Offline
                                fbartelsF Offline
                                fbartels
                                App Dev
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #59

                                @atrilahiji for me this works with

                                ➜  cloudron-humhub-app git:(harden-app-code) git rev-parse --short HEAD
                                0b5df1c
                                

                                Steps I tried:

                                • Install app (in debug mode, but only so that i could override and start the start.sh manually)
                                • finished Humhub installation
                                • went into admin and selected modules
                                • installed a module
                                • activated a module
                                • no php error can be seen
                                ? 1 Reply Last reply
                                1
                                • fbartelsF fbartels

                                  @atrilahiji for me this works with

                                  ➜  cloudron-humhub-app git:(harden-app-code) git rev-parse --short HEAD
                                  0b5df1c
                                  

                                  Steps I tried:

                                  • Install app (in debug mode, but only so that i could override and start the start.sh manually)
                                  • finished Humhub installation
                                  • went into admin and selected modules
                                  • installed a module
                                  • activated a module
                                  • no php error can be seen
                                  ? Offline
                                  ? Offline
                                  A Former User
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #60

                                  @fbartels Huh so you manually started start.sh from the terminal in recovery mode? I get the exact same error doing that. Did you do something else to modify the permissions?

                                  fbartelsF 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • ? A Former User

                                    @fbartels Huh so you manually started start.sh from the terminal in recovery mode? I get the exact same error doing that. Did you do something else to modify the permissions?

                                    fbartelsF Offline
                                    fbartelsF Offline
                                    fbartels
                                    App Dev
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #61

                                    @atrilahiji no, no changes at all. maybe some leftovers from a previous installation of yours?

                                    Yes, you can run cloudron install --debug where then the init script is not run. you then need to exec into the app and run it manually.

                                    ? 2 Replies Last reply
                                    1
                                    • fbartelsF fbartels

                                      @atrilahiji no, no changes at all. maybe some leftovers from a previous installation of yours?

                                      Yes, you can run cloudron install --debug where then the init script is not run. you then need to exec into the app and run it manually.

                                      ? Offline
                                      ? Offline
                                      A Former User
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #62

                                      @fbartels ahhh I see what you mean. I'll try that.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • fbartelsF fbartels

                                        @atrilahiji no, no changes at all. maybe some leftovers from a previous installation of yours?

                                        Yes, you can run cloudron install --debug where then the init script is not run. you then need to exec into the app and run it manually.

                                        ? Offline
                                        ? Offline
                                        A Former User
                                        wrote on last edited by A Former User
                                        #63

                                        @fbartels Oh weird yeah that works... no clue why it wouldn't work if the start.sh is run normally during an install...

                                        IDK if you saw the same error but if I don't start in debug mode and switch to Recovery Mode, running start.sh results in a permission error for PHP again.

                                        EDIT: Nvm I think I figured it out...

                                        fbartelsF 2 Replies Last reply
                                        0
                                        • ? A Former User

                                          @fbartels Oh weird yeah that works... no clue why it wouldn't work if the start.sh is run normally during an install...

                                          IDK if you saw the same error but if I don't start in debug mode and switch to Recovery Mode, running start.sh results in a permission error for PHP again.

                                          EDIT: Nvm I think I figured it out...

                                          fbartelsF Offline
                                          fbartelsF Offline
                                          fbartels
                                          App Dev
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #64

                                          @atrilahiji ah nevermind, i forgot that part of debug is that the container is not read-only. Looking at the code now a bit closer.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          1
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • Bookmarks
                                          • Search