What's coming in 7.3
-
@girish said in What's coming in 7.3:
Updated the changelog if anyone is interested - https://git.cloudron.io/cloudron/box/-/blob/master/CHANGES#L2511
This may be minor, but may I suggest the changelogs be sorted alphabetically so that we can see related changes easier per function (i.e. mail)?
If we did that, not only would it make it easier for admins to read and parse, but the development team could detect duplicate entries in the changelog easier
Note that there are two duplicate entries such as the following:
mail: fix issue where signature was appended to text attachmentsmail: catch all address can be any domain
Sorted alphabetically:
* Applinks - app bookmarks in dashboard * IPv6: initial support for ipv6 only server * Proxied apps * Randomize certificate generation cronjob to lighten load on Let's Encrypt servers * UI: fix issue where mailbox display name was not init correctly * User directory: Cloudron connector uses 2FA auth * acme: Randomize certificate renewal check over a whole day * backups: Fix precondition check which was not erroring if mount is missing * backups: allow space in label name * backups: optional encryption of backup file names * eventlog: add event for impersonated user login * filemanager: add split view * graphs: cgroup v2 support * graphs: show app disk usage graphs * ldap & user directory: Remove virtual user and admin groups * ldap: remove virtual user and admin groups to ldap user records * mail: accept only STARTTLS servers for relay * mail: add queue management API and UI * mail: add storage quota support * mail: allow aliases to have wildcard * mail: catch all address can be any domain * mail: catch all address can be any domain * mail: fix crash when solr is enabled on Ubuntu 22 (cgroup v2 detection fix) * mail: fix issue where certificate renewal did not restart the mail container properly * mail: fix issue where signature was appended to text attachments * mail: fix issue where signature was appended to text attachments * nginx: fix zero length certs when out of disk space * notification: Fix crash when backupId is null * port bindings: add read only flag * proxyAuth: add supportsBearerAuth flag * redis: restart button will now rebuild if the container is missing * wasabi: add singapore and sydney regions@d19dotca that's a good idea for the public release notes, I have made it alphabetical there (this is the one you see when you click update on Cloudron, usually it is more high level and not commit based). This changelog in the repo is really just internal and not meant to be read by end users. I know I posted it on the forum, but was just trying to give a heads up for curious people
-
Just preparing the release. Updated the changelog if anyone is interested - https://git.cloudron.io/cloudron/box/-/blob/master/CHANGES#L2511 . The CI is running now, hopefully this is done this week.
-
Quick question… the mailbox limit size feature… it’s currently only able to be set on individual mailboxes as opposed to a shared limit domain-wide, right? If true then I’ll file a feature request to make it domain-wide if not already filed, as that’d be excellent.
Just wanted to make sure I hadn’t overlooked something though first.--
Dustin Dauncey
www.d19.ca -
Quick question… the mailbox limit size feature… it’s currently only able to be set on individual mailboxes as opposed to a shared limit domain-wide, right? If true then I’ll file a feature request to make it domain-wide if not already filed, as that’d be excellent.
Just wanted to make sure I hadn’t overlooked something though first. -
Is 7.3.1 stable enough to use now? I have received the update notification in my Cloudron instances, but it still contains a warning that it is unstable, so I am hesitant on my two production instances.
-
Is 7.3.1 stable enough to use now? I have received the update notification in my Cloudron instances, but it still contains a warning that it is unstable, so I am hesitant on my two production instances.
-
@ekevu123 It's best to wait for 7.3.2 (unless you want to test early). It's mostly stable, though there are a few bugs. I think we should have it out coming Monday.
-
In 7.3.2 I noticed the release notes mention a network graph, but I'm not seeing that network graph at all in 7.3.2 when I installed it the other night... is this only supported on maybe Ubuntu 22 instead of Ubuntu 20 for example?
* graphs: add cpu/disk/network usageAll I see are the regular CPU, memory, and disk usage graphs. No network usage graphs that I could find. Am I missing something obvious?
EDIT: I just realized these network graphs are on the individual app itself, not the System page. A bit unclear from the release notes, but maybe the network graph can be added to the System tab too where it's an amalgamation of all the container parts for example?
--
Dustin Dauncey
www.d19.ca -
In 7.3.2 I noticed the release notes mention a network graph, but I'm not seeing that network graph at all in 7.3.2 when I installed it the other night... is this only supported on maybe Ubuntu 22 instead of Ubuntu 20 for example?
* graphs: add cpu/disk/network usageAll I see are the regular CPU, memory, and disk usage graphs. No network usage graphs that I could find. Am I missing something obvious?
EDIT: I just realized these network graphs are on the individual app itself, not the System page. A bit unclear from the release notes, but maybe the network graph can be added to the System tab too where it's an amalgamation of all the container parts for example?
-
@d19dotca yes, currently the network graphs are only app level. We want to see how it works out before adding it to the system level.
I got a notification that 7.3.2 is available. See screenshot below:
But then I get a warning when I go to settings that it is not considered stable yet. Is this true or has that just not been updated yet?
-
I got a notification that 7.3.2 is available. See screenshot below:
But then I get a warning when I go to settings that it is not considered stable yet. Is this true or has that just not been updated yet?
-
@colonelpanic did you maybe manually check for updates recently? If so then the update will be visible but will not be applied automatically, yet.
Hi everyone,
I did the upgrade today to 7.3.2, which seems to have worked great. I first did a bit of cleanup to remove some no longer mailboxes since catchall now works with all mailboxes instead of just mailboxes on the same domain.
I also wanted to play around with the new proxy and external link feature (at first I expected to find these as an app and did not immediately see the buttons for them on top of the appstore listing). What does not seem to work however is to directly restrict visibility of external app links to users, as the dropdown listing is just shown as empty:
After adding the app as visible for all users it is however possible to restrict it back to the desired users from the main dashboard.
Its a nice feature that this automatically fetches profile pictures for the apps
-
Hi everyone,
I did the upgrade today to 7.3.2, which seems to have worked great. I first did a bit of cleanup to remove some no longer mailboxes since catchall now works with all mailboxes instead of just mailboxes on the same domain.
I also wanted to play around with the new proxy and external link feature (at first I expected to find these as an app and did not immediately see the buttons for them on top of the appstore listing). What does not seem to work however is to directly restrict visibility of external app links to users, as the dropdown listing is just shown as empty:
After adding the app as visible for all users it is however possible to restrict it back to the desired users from the main dashboard.
Its a nice feature that this automatically fetches profile pictures for the apps
@fbartels ah thanks for the bug report. We only moved that from the apps grid to the appstore view last minute and seems like something about the users and groups was not patched up. Will fix this.
We kinda went back and forth where and how to put applinks as they are not real apps as such, first you would add them in the apps grid, but that wasn't ideal. We can improve on the current situation as we go though and if it makes more sense to show it as an app in the appstore then maybe we can do that as well. Would be good to hear some more feedback on this.
-
@fbartels ah thanks for the bug report. We only moved that from the apps grid to the appstore view last minute and seems like something about the users and groups was not patched up. Will fix this.
We kinda went back and forth where and how to put applinks as they are not real apps as such, first you would add them in the apps grid, but that wasn't ideal. We can improve on the current situation as we go though and if it makes more sense to show it as an app in the appstore then maybe we can do that as well. Would be good to hear some more feedback on this.
-
@fbartels fixed now, but pending a new patch release. We will wait a bit to collect more fixes.
-
@fbartels fixed now, but pending a new patch release. We will wait a bit to collect more fixes.
-
@nebulon Guessing you didn't intend for the new buttons to push out the right column in the App Store grid?
@marcusquinn what is your horizontal page width in pixels? It should not overflow the 4rth item in the row. Also which browser is this and since I saw that, how wide is your default scrollbar on the right? Not sure why it renders like that on modern browsers, but maybe that eats the remaining pixels to make it overflow?
