Cloudron makes it easy to run web apps like WordPress, Nextcloud, GitLab on your server. Find out more or install now.


Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Bookmarks
  • Search
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

Cloudron Forum

Apps | Demo | Docs | Install
  1. Cloudron Forum
  2. App Wishlist
  3. standard notes - storage server component

standard notes - storage server component

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved App Wishlist
36 Posts 17 Posters 6.1k Views 18 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • T thetomester13

    @marcusquinn the extensions are available to the community and for self hosting, though it's recommended to support StandardNotes. That being said, Notion is a completely different app that fills a different niche. It's also not open sourced.

    fbartelsF Offline
    fbartelsF Offline
    fbartels
    App Dev
    wrote on last edited by
    #13

    I've been using a self hosted standardnotes instance for a few weeks and it gives me mixed feelings.

    First of all, its a plaintext notepad. Everything is stored as raw plain text, there are some editors that give you a wysiwyg editor that stores text as markdown. https://github.com/arturolinares/sn-rme is a nice editor, but for the first week it was broken to me after modifying a note with another editor.

    The webapp is not offline capable. It will continue to work when you have it open when going offline, but won't start without an active connection to the server.

    Its not collaborative. There is no way to share a note in a way that another user can also edit it and you see the changes. You cannot even link/bookmark to notes yourself. Even with the same user on multiple devices its sometimes difficult, I had it happen a few times that I was working on a note on my first device left it open, made a quick edit on a second device. when just continuing in the same note on my primary some of the changes get "lost" (its still in the revision can be restored, but that can be tedious on large notes).

    Their filters/labels are a bit strange and you need to know their syntax to use them (no wizards, few useful presets, you need to delete and recreate and cannot change them).

    You are really only limited to text. No possibility to easily add images or other file types. In their hosted offering they have a "file safe" but that is yet another service required for it and this only relays data which would still need to be stored in webdav/dropbox/google drive. Because of this its unlikely that it would ever get pen input support. At least not in the like of e.g. evernote or onenote.

    I want to like it, but at the same time need something with a few more features. A cross between this, codimd and with offline capability would be nice. (with a cherry on top if that would also support pen input)

    robiR T fbartelsF 3 Replies Last reply
    3
    • fbartelsF fbartels

      I've been using a self hosted standardnotes instance for a few weeks and it gives me mixed feelings.

      First of all, its a plaintext notepad. Everything is stored as raw plain text, there are some editors that give you a wysiwyg editor that stores text as markdown. https://github.com/arturolinares/sn-rme is a nice editor, but for the first week it was broken to me after modifying a note with another editor.

      The webapp is not offline capable. It will continue to work when you have it open when going offline, but won't start without an active connection to the server.

      Its not collaborative. There is no way to share a note in a way that another user can also edit it and you see the changes. You cannot even link/bookmark to notes yourself. Even with the same user on multiple devices its sometimes difficult, I had it happen a few times that I was working on a note on my first device left it open, made a quick edit on a second device. when just continuing in the same note on my primary some of the changes get "lost" (its still in the revision can be restored, but that can be tedious on large notes).

      Their filters/labels are a bit strange and you need to know their syntax to use them (no wizards, few useful presets, you need to delete and recreate and cannot change them).

      You are really only limited to text. No possibility to easily add images or other file types. In their hosted offering they have a "file safe" but that is yet another service required for it and this only relays data which would still need to be stored in webdav/dropbox/google drive. Because of this its unlikely that it would ever get pen input support. At least not in the like of e.g. evernote or onenote.

      I want to like it, but at the same time need something with a few more features. A cross between this, codimd and with offline capability would be nice. (with a cherry on top if that would also support pen input)

      robiR Offline
      robiR Offline
      robi
      wrote on last edited by
      #14

      @fbartels sounds like 👎

      Have you tried TiddlyRoam?
      https://github.com/joekroese/tiddlyroam/

      Conscious tech

      fbartelsF 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • robiR robi

        @fbartels sounds like 👎

        Have you tried TiddlyRoam?
        https://github.com/joekroese/tiddlyroam/

        fbartelsF Offline
        fbartelsF Offline
        fbartels
        App Dev
        wrote on last edited by
        #15

        @robi i have used tiddlywiki ages ago. Looking at it's current state it's syntax looks weird. My preference would be markdown instead of learning a syntax of it's own.

        robiR 1 Reply Last reply
        1
        • fbartelsF fbartels

          @robi i have used tiddlywiki ages ago. Looking at it's current state it's syntax looks weird. My preference would be markdown instead of learning a syntax of it's own.

          robiR Offline
          robiR Offline
          robi
          wrote on last edited by
          #16

          @fbartels That is possible via a plugin aparently:
          https://github.com/joekroese/tiddlyroam/issues/13

          Conscious tech

          1 Reply Last reply
          1
          • fbartelsF fbartels

            I've been using a self hosted standardnotes instance for a few weeks and it gives me mixed feelings.

            First of all, its a plaintext notepad. Everything is stored as raw plain text, there are some editors that give you a wysiwyg editor that stores text as markdown. https://github.com/arturolinares/sn-rme is a nice editor, but for the first week it was broken to me after modifying a note with another editor.

            The webapp is not offline capable. It will continue to work when you have it open when going offline, but won't start without an active connection to the server.

            Its not collaborative. There is no way to share a note in a way that another user can also edit it and you see the changes. You cannot even link/bookmark to notes yourself. Even with the same user on multiple devices its sometimes difficult, I had it happen a few times that I was working on a note on my first device left it open, made a quick edit on a second device. when just continuing in the same note on my primary some of the changes get "lost" (its still in the revision can be restored, but that can be tedious on large notes).

            Their filters/labels are a bit strange and you need to know their syntax to use them (no wizards, few useful presets, you need to delete and recreate and cannot change them).

            You are really only limited to text. No possibility to easily add images or other file types. In their hosted offering they have a "file safe" but that is yet another service required for it and this only relays data which would still need to be stored in webdav/dropbox/google drive. Because of this its unlikely that it would ever get pen input support. At least not in the like of e.g. evernote or onenote.

            I want to like it, but at the same time need something with a few more features. A cross between this, codimd and with offline capability would be nice. (with a cherry on top if that would also support pen input)

            T Offline
            T Offline
            thetomester13
            App Dev
            wrote on last edited by
            #17

            @fbartels I agree that StandardNotes is not the end all notes solution, but I haven't found that yet...

            I'm switching over from Automattic's SimpleNote and this is a great self hosted, fully encrypted alternative for my personal notes. In fact, with some of the Extensions that are available, this will enable some great and welcomed functionality on my end, such as Task Lists, themes, and Markdown syntax among others. For shared lists I'm hoping to see Vikunja be packaged in the near future.

            1 Reply Last reply
            1
            • fbartelsF fbartels

              I've been using a self hosted standardnotes instance for a few weeks and it gives me mixed feelings.

              First of all, its a plaintext notepad. Everything is stored as raw plain text, there are some editors that give you a wysiwyg editor that stores text as markdown. https://github.com/arturolinares/sn-rme is a nice editor, but for the first week it was broken to me after modifying a note with another editor.

              The webapp is not offline capable. It will continue to work when you have it open when going offline, but won't start without an active connection to the server.

              Its not collaborative. There is no way to share a note in a way that another user can also edit it and you see the changes. You cannot even link/bookmark to notes yourself. Even with the same user on multiple devices its sometimes difficult, I had it happen a few times that I was working on a note on my first device left it open, made a quick edit on a second device. when just continuing in the same note on my primary some of the changes get "lost" (its still in the revision can be restored, but that can be tedious on large notes).

              Their filters/labels are a bit strange and you need to know their syntax to use them (no wizards, few useful presets, you need to delete and recreate and cannot change them).

              You are really only limited to text. No possibility to easily add images or other file types. In their hosted offering they have a "file safe" but that is yet another service required for it and this only relays data which would still need to be stored in webdav/dropbox/google drive. Because of this its unlikely that it would ever get pen input support. At least not in the like of e.g. evernote or onenote.

              I want to like it, but at the same time need something with a few more features. A cross between this, codimd and with offline capability would be nice. (with a cherry on top if that would also support pen input)

              fbartelsF Offline
              fbartelsF Offline
              fbartels
              App Dev
              wrote on last edited by
              #18

              A last reply about my use of Standardnotes. I have just retired my own installation of it. While its a nice editor it simply did not really cut in in terms of searching content and organising todos within notes. I've used it as a kind of journal/log for work and to keep an overview of open tasks related to these. That worked quite ok, even though I was limited to text and could not really cross link.

              The standardnotes devs have been busy replacing the ruby based server with a more elaborate setup, which in the future should support binary data in notes (like pictures). However two weeks ago they broke the compatibility of their desktop and mobile applications with the old syncing server, and that without any prior notice. This does not really leave a good impression for others self hosting their software. So instead of migrating to their new stack I migrated away. Tasks are now organised in Vikunja, which also allows extensive notes and comments on tasks, and the log/journal is simply a channel in my private Rocketchat.

              T 1 Reply Last reply
              2
              • fbartelsF fbartels

                A last reply about my use of Standardnotes. I have just retired my own installation of it. While its a nice editor it simply did not really cut in in terms of searching content and organising todos within notes. I've used it as a kind of journal/log for work and to keep an overview of open tasks related to these. That worked quite ok, even though I was limited to text and could not really cross link.

                The standardnotes devs have been busy replacing the ruby based server with a more elaborate setup, which in the future should support binary data in notes (like pictures). However two weeks ago they broke the compatibility of their desktop and mobile applications with the old syncing server, and that without any prior notice. This does not really leave a good impression for others self hosting their software. So instead of migrating to their new stack I migrated away. Tasks are now organised in Vikunja, which also allows extensive notes and comments on tasks, and the log/journal is simply a channel in my private Rocketchat.

                T Offline
                T Offline
                thetomester13
                App Dev
                wrote on last edited by
                #19

                @fbartels thanks for following up on this!

                I've gotten off the idea of StandardNotes as well after reading some other bad experiences using this system. I'm currently using Joplin which isn't 100% what I'm looking for, but does work quite well. Also it looks like a Joplin server might make it to the light of day which might help stabilize it a bit further.

                jdaviescoatesJ 1 Reply Last reply
                4
                • T thetomester13

                  @fbartels thanks for following up on this!

                  I've gotten off the idea of StandardNotes as well after reading some other bad experiences using this system. I'm currently using Joplin which isn't 100% what I'm looking for, but does work quite well. Also it looks like a Joplin server might make it to the light of day which might help stabilize it a bit further.

                  jdaviescoatesJ Offline
                  jdaviescoatesJ Offline
                  jdaviescoates
                  wrote on last edited by jdaviescoates
                  #20

                  @thetomester13 looks like @klawitterb has packaged it https://forum.cloudron.io/post/34357

                  I use Cloudron with Gandi & Hetzner

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  3
                  • ? Offline
                    ? Offline
                    A Former User
                    wrote on last edited by A Former User
                    #21

                    Is there any possibility of self-hosting the web app. https://github.com/standardnotes/app

                    I don't know if things have improved since this was first raised, but I'm having trouble finding a self-hosted encrypted note taking app.

                    Joplin Server is licensed for non-commercial use, and is not a web app.

                    Something else that looks promising is notesnook, but is not yet available to self-host and was just recently made open source.

                    R 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • ? A Former User

                      Is there any possibility of self-hosting the web app. https://github.com/standardnotes/app

                      I don't know if things have improved since this was first raised, but I'm having trouble finding a self-hosted encrypted note taking app.

                      Joplin Server is licensed for non-commercial use, and is not a web app.

                      Something else that looks promising is notesnook, but is not yet available to self-host and was just recently made open source.

                      R Offline
                      R Offline
                      r369
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #22

                      I would l like someone to implement this, I am happy to do the money incentive. @appdev

                      R 1 Reply Last reply
                      2
                      • R r369

                        I would l like someone to implement this, I am happy to do the money incentive. @appdev

                        R Offline
                        R Offline
                        r369
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #23

                        @r369 anyone can help to implement it? Is one of the greatest note taking app that I ever seen!

                        robiR 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • R r369

                          @r369 anyone can help to implement it? Is one of the greatest note taking app that I ever seen!

                          robiR Offline
                          robiR Offline
                          robi
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #24

                          @r369 Have you looked at Joplin?

                          Conscious tech

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • girishG Offline
                            girishG Offline
                            girish
                            Staff
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #25

                            Some news about standard notes - https://forum.cloudron.io/topic/8570/news-about-standardnotes

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            2
                            • robiR Offline
                              robiR Offline
                              robi
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #26

                              https://standardnotes.com/blog/introducing-self-hosting-v2

                              Conscious tech

                              infogulchI 1 Reply Last reply
                              3
                              • robiR robi

                                https://standardnotes.com/blog/introducing-self-hosting-v2

                                infogulchI Offline
                                infogulchI Offline
                                infogulch
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #27

                                Looks like standard notes now only requires 4 containers in a standard docker-compose installation:

                                • standardnotes/server
                                • localstack/localstack:1.3
                                • mysql:8
                                • redis:6.0-alpine

                                Since cloudron supports the last two natively that bodes well. I guess the main porting task would be to merge the standardnotes/server and localstack images and run them together with a supervisor.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                2
                                • F Offline
                                  F Offline
                                  farmerjo
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #28

                                  More details now available on licensing for self hosted option:
                                  https://standardnotes.com/help/48/can-i-use-extensions-with-a-self-hosted-server

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • girishG Offline
                                    girishG Offline
                                    girish
                                    Staff
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #29

                                    It seems the price is 39/year. Very reasonable!

                                    F 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • L Offline
                                      L Offline
                                      lukas
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #30

                                      so a subscription is definitely needed?

                                      timconsidineT 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • L lukas

                                        so a subscription is definitely needed?

                                        timconsidineT Offline
                                        timconsidineT Offline
                                        timconsidine
                                        App Dev
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #31

                                        @lukas said in standard notes - storage server component:

                                        so a subscription is definitely needed?

                                        I am not familiar with the self-hosted version, I only use the hosted version.
                                        On the hosted version, paying a fee unlocks extra facilities and plugins, but it is (or used to be) possible to use the basic version free.
                                        But maybe it is different for self-hosted and licence is required for even basic usage.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • fbartelsF Offline
                                          fbartelsF Offline
                                          fbartels
                                          App Dev
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #32

                                          They had this loophole in the past that if you host the extensions that were otherwise paywalled yourself (since they were still oss) that you could use these. But with the introduction of this subscription that loophole got closed as far as i know.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • Bookmarks
                                          • Search