Posts made by jk

@girish thank you.

That worked for docker volume prune. The other command (docker image prune) did not actually clean anything up though, but the output of docker system df stays with 66% reclaimable.

Any further ideas?

Hi,

I have another question regardiing this. The following is the output of docker system df.

$ docker system df
TYPE                TOTAL               ACTIVE              SIZE                RECLAIMABLE
Images              34                  16                  9.857GB             6.508GB (66%)
Containers          21                  18                  0B                  0B
Local Volumes       160                 36                  5.274GB             3.964GB (75%)
Build Cache         0                   0                   0B                  0B

As you can see, docker claims that a lot of storage is reclaimable.

Is it safe to run docker volume prune and docker image prune?

Thanks a lot!

@nebulon said in Cloudron 3.3 released:

(...) The current wallabag is not yet compatible with the version of Postgres Cloudron > 3.2.3 ships. So reinstallation would not work. This is the reason we block the Cloudron update for instances which have wallabag installed.

It looks like making Wallabag support a newer version of Postgresql is literally a single-line patch.

Might it make sense to carry this as a custom patch for now and be done with it?