@micmc Please do and report back your findings.

@micmc it is nice, I have used it
I got bit disenchanted with old UI - doesn't scream modern
My users didn't like it much
But it works well.

@timconsidine actually depends on their licensing model. We are not at all against paid apps delivered through Cloudron. I understand the need to make a living as a small team pouring your time into a great project. Although in this case I guess, the packaging initiative should come from the upstream app from now on. Of course we are happy to assist, it still looks like a solid good app 🙂

@robi Cool I see the idea, thanks.
Advantage over LAMP ?

File Browser is a create-your-own-cloud-kind of software where you can install it on a server, direct it to a path and then access your files through a nice web interface.

Docs: https://filebrowser.org/
GitHub: https://github.com/filebrowser/filebrowser
Docker: https://hub.docker.com/r/filebrowser/filebrowser

@robi Better to just use the LAMP app for testing I think

Another easy node app, nice.

Love all the optimizations they did too.

@atridad Absolutely agree. Jirafeau working nice and stable and Bitwarden is perhabs the best hardened Solition with Rust.

@marcusquinn wow!

Looks interesting:

53765539-2311-4ec6-887d-01fecbb0b1ac-image.png

@robi said in MediaCMS:

While it's still in beta and has rough edges with hardcoded paths and not working well behind a reverse proxy yet, we should keep track of the progress.

Seems to be on 1.6 now so hopefully those issues have been resolved?

@bubonicfred @girish seems to be working now

@ccfu I'm working with Espo daily now and I can say that I don't think anyone needs the Sales Pack, as that's easy enough to reproduce. I don't really use any of the Advanced pack stuff as most of that can be reproduced in Functions. The other stuff you can pretty much do without too unless you're an enterprise, in which case it is very cheap. The ease of working with the API is also an important consideration for me.

I was a fan of SugarCRM over a decade ago, that became SuiteCRM. I'm sure you can get similar results out of it, but the fundamental framework will just always be slower, and there's nothing anyone can do about that than use something else.

I wouldn't object to it being an option with Cloudron, to make it easier for more people to compare, I just don't know if that's justification enough for competing attention to build apps that do fill feature gaps.

I am still very interested in this project and would like to find it in the app store. However, I am not competent enough to package it but I am willing to help.

Having a real hate / love relation with Cloudron...
The convenience of having all apps securely managed under one roof is simply fantastic.
That said, we installed Cloudron to eliminate time spend setting up simple, open-source applications - but many times we end up trying to find workarounds installing certain dependencies needed for 3rd party plugins from installed Cloudron apps...
I'm really hoping they'll allow a bit more control within the containers in the future..

Did guys figure out a solution to this issue yet?