@girish Got it. I think the text "Clear Icon" should say "Refresh Favicon" then. As I was expecting that link to clear it for then showing an option to import or upload one.

@girish any news on the development status? 🙂
Would appreciate an update

@avatar1024 said in Include min and max in memory graph:

Also in general I do find it pretty hard to read and get info for the individual apps because they're all stacked at the bottom and you can hardly select an individual app.

Same, personally I find these graphs to be almost completely useless 😛 (so if I want to look at a specific app I look at the graphs for just that app in the app setting)

@girish if you want make a user on https://join.plusonenetwork.xyz/ and I will make you an admin and provide steps for you to reproduce

Also here is my API: https://git.plusone.network/nick/cloudron-registration-community/-/blob/master/dmxConnect/api/new_user_flow.php

@girish Did some testing. I think you are right. The distance is reducing the bandwidth I guess.

I also would prefer inwx.de which has an API, maybe that is an argument too.

@anschein Yep. Unfortunately I've never found a solution with matrix as the cloudron matrix overwrites turn on restart. Apparently the external turn option is coming in Cloudron 7.3.

Managing backups like we mange mailboxes does sound like a good idea, and can have checkboxes for daily, full, etc. per app, and more.

@infogulch that's a bit odd IMO to have to find them, as they should be explicitly defined.

Perhaps make a post in App Dev section to get assistance with the solution you're working on, as a step in the right direction.

@nebulon I was maybe not clear enough, the feature request is for sending out an HTTP request when a backup is successful, not reacting to an API request.

@girish
The problem seems to be that on "Server A" I have to enable mailservices for the domain in question. Then when I try to send mail from Server B the

server B produces an error

{ "ts": 1663009665363, "type": "deferred", "direction": "outbound", "uuid": "B17FA8D4-5997-4FE6-8636-400140195457.1", "messageId": null, "mailFrom": "<>", "spamStatus": null, "rcptTo": [ "<no-reply@serverB.com>" ], "message": "Tried all MXs", "delay": 8192 }

and server A produces the error

{ "ts": 1663009909718, "type": "bounce", "direction": "outbound", "uuid": "380CB958-8DD9-45DC-B9C3-13F89C1FD866.1.1", "messageId": "<f993a729-8533-909f-f3d0-be386c19df96@draglabs.com>", "mailFrom": "<no-reply@draglabs.com>", "spamStatus": null, "rcptTo": [ "<user@serverB.com>" ], "message": "Some recipients failed: <user@serverB.com>", "mx": { "priority": 0, "exchange": "127.0.0.1", "port": 2424, "using_lmtp": true, "family": "A", "bind_helo": "my.draglabs.com" }, "bounced_rcpt": [ { "original": "<user@serverB.com>", "original_host": "serverB.com", "host": "serverB.com", "user": "user", "reason": "550 5.1.1 <user@serverB.com> User doesn't exist: user@serverB.com", "dsn_action": "failed", "dsn_smtp_code": "550", "dsn_smtp_extc": "5.1.1", "dsn_status": "5.1.1", "dsn_smtp_response": "<user@serverB.com> User doesn't exist: user@serverB.com", "dsn_remote_mta": "127.0.0.1" } ] }

What I think is happening is that because I enabled email on Server A, Server A is automatically looking for that user's email inbox to drop the email as opposed to routing it though the internet where is would use the MX records listed in the DNS.

So the question becomes how do you log into an email server without enabling inbound email.

Or how do you convince cloudron to be happy sending email from a different subdomain? like mail.serverb.com without setting the root of server be to my.mail.serverb.com

yes confirmed

I did some tests and they way it is configured now I can email anyone other than <user>@DomainB.com and if I disable "Incoming Email" then the server A user "relay@serverB.com" cannot authenticate for the purpose of sending emails.

@subven @girish - Any Ideas on a solution here?

This is implemented in 7.3

+1 . I think this will indeed make things a lot more secure than we have now. It is complicated to have this work across apps, but we should do it for all the apps that support it .

@murgero Great, thank you for the suggestion! Hopefully the team will still consider this valid request, but appreciate this workaround.

Agreed, this would be very useful. Would love to be able to assign specific IP addresses to specific domains.

It would also be nice to be able to disable the "You are seeing this page because the DNS record of nn.nn.nn.nnn is set to this server's IP but Cloudron has no app configured for this domain." for http requests sent directly to the server IP.

@benborges
Zabbix is running on a Master Node and each Client has an Agent. (Yes the master is an external System)
Zabbix can monitor clients active and passive.
Passive means the Master asks the system for data and the system delivers.

This does not always work within special networks where the master can not reach the client.
Then you use active monitoring then the client reports all data in a certain interval to the master.

There can be a master / slave / proxy setup for big scale monitoring solutions. (Google Zabbix HA Cluster Setup for more details)

For more in detail please consult the doc: https://www.zabbix.com/documentation/current/en/manual/introduction/about

Maybe a useful thread, if you haven't seen already:

https://forum.cloudron.io/topic/5123/has-anyone-set-up-nextcloud-with-a-hetzner-storagebox-cifs-mount-as-primary-storage

@plusone-nick said in Global option to disable "visible/allow all users from this Cloudron":

Global option to disable "visible/allow all users from this Cloudron" when installing apps forcing admins to use group or user permissions sets

If you create atleast one Group, the UI does not select "visible/allow all users" by default. The UI assumes that since you have group(s), you probably want to select a specific group.

We did this for the same reason I assume you are requesting this - when installing an app you don't want to throw it out to all users and confuse them...

@eyecreate Keep us posted - that's a great add!

@marcusquinn said in Disk space should never bring a whole server down:

Maybe the Cloudron app needs to generate its own partition to run from, where regular app storage can't saturate the OS or Cloudron partitions?

Right. The main issue, it's not possible to create proper disk partitions in VPS 😕 i.e one can only create file backed loop back file systems but such things are not to be used in production and I have no idea about their reliability/durability.

@nebulon Perfect!🙌 Much appreciated! 🙏

@privsec if you're still interested: https://forum.cloudron.io/topic/7546/open-registration-app-for-cloudron

@plusone-nick said in Open registration:

Also interested in this use case - if any code is shared please let me know =] I will also look into giving this a shot

Better late than never 😅 https://forum.cloudron.io/topic/7546/open-registration-app-for-cloudron

I am trying to achieve unified inbox in SnappyMail and posted some questions here https://forum.cloudron.io/post/52418

For what its worth, the next package update will have an increased memory limit as I agree, it is currently a bit low.

@BrutalBirdie thank you very much!!

Also, including "auto whitelist" might be interesting:

whitelisting all addresses you email to whitelisting from an LDAP address book

See https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/spamassassin/ManualWhitelist

@nennogabriel that's another nice idea!