Cloudron makes it easy to run web apps like WordPress, Nextcloud, GitLab on your server. Find out more or install now.


Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Bookmarks
  • Search
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

Cloudron Forum

Apps | Demo | Docs | Install
  1. Cloudron Forum
  2. Support
  3. Hetzner PTR Record Invalid

Hetzner PTR Record Invalid

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Solved Support
hetznerptr
32 Posts 10 Posters 3.3k Views 10 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • scookeS Offline
    scookeS Offline
    scooke
    wrote on last edited by
    #10

    I just finished watching Geostorm just now, and I can't help but read these last two posts with a rising panicky voice, as though the future of the world depends on resolving this...

    A life lived in fear is a life half-lived

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • d19dotcaD Offline
      d19dotcaD Offline
      d19dotca
      wrote on last edited by d19dotca
      #11

      FWIW, I have noticed recently that my emails to Gmail addresses in particular are being rate limited and it appears to be because Google sees it as possible spam.

      When I ran some tests, I see my DKIM is no longer signed properly even though there's been no DNS changes. I've verified my DNS and everything looks good, but the date this happened according to Google Postmaster Tools is December 19th. I updated Cloudron to 8.2.0 on the night of December 18th (so basically the 19th from any Eastern Time zone or UTC-0 time).

      https://unspam.email/results/plVX3ZXGoX shows bad DKIM ("Existing DKIM Signature: The email is not signed with DKIM, whether or not it is a valid signature; Verified DKIM Signature: The email is not signed with a valid DKIM signature.") and a warning for DMARC ("The email "from" domain not matches the DKIM signature "from" domain.").

      It's too coincidental with no changes being made to DNS manually that issues start occurring with DKIM as soon as I upgraded Cloudron to 8.2.0, so I am of the mindset something is wrong in Cloudron.

      Here's a screenshot of status from Google Postmaster Tools:

      image.png

      Side note: I think the DNS records part about missing PTR record has been fixed now but the Postmaster Tools hasn't updated yet. It turned out this issue exposed a missing PTR on my IPv6 record (but was set correctly for IPv4).

      I should also add that Cloudron shows no errors at all when it run the DNS checks, it's all green. Also I ran host commands and see PTR just fine. So I think the issue is more related to DKIM at this point in Cloudron.

      % host -t PTR <ip_address>
      <ip_address>.in-addr.arpa domain name pointer mail.d19.ca.
      % host -t PTR <ipv6_address>  
      <ipv6_address>.ip6.arpa domain name pointer mail.d19.ca.
      

      Just FYI, @girish .

      --
      Dustin Dauncey
      www.d19.ca

      1 Reply Last reply
      3
      • d19dotcaD Offline
        d19dotcaD Offline
        d19dotca
        wrote on last edited by
        #12

        Not sure if related, but I do see DKIM mentioned as being replaced, and unsure if this is part of the reason or not. Maybe a reach but wanted to share this in case:

        Dec 29 21:40:15 70:M 30 Dec 2024 05:40:15.252 * Server initialized
        Dec 29 21:40:15 70:M 30 Dec 2024 05:40:15.252 * Ready to accept connections tcp
        Dec 29 21:40:15 doveconf: Warning: service auth { client_limit=1000 } is lower than required under max. load (1300). Counted for protocol services with service_count != 1: service managesieve-login { process_limit=100 } + service pop3-login { process_limit=500 } + service lmtp { process_limit=100 } + service imap-urlauth-login { process_limit=100 } + service imap-login { process_limit=500 }
        Dec 29 21:40:15 doveconf: Warning: service anvil { client_limit=1000 } is lower than required under max. load (1203). Counted with: service managesieve-login { process_limit=100 } + service pop3-login { process_limit=500 } + service imap-urlauth-login { process_limit=100 } + service imap-login { process_limit=500 } + service auth { process_limit=1 }
        Dec 29 21:40:15 Warning: service auth { client_limit=1000 } is lower than required under max. load (1300). Counted for protocol services with service_count != 1: service managesieve-login { process_limit=100 } + service pop3-login { process_limit=500 } + service lmtp { process_limit=100 } + service imap-urlauth-login { process_limit=100 } + service imap-login { process_limit=500 }
        Dec 29 21:40:15 Warning: service anvil { client_limit=1000 } is lower than required under max. load (1203). Counted with: service managesieve-login { process_limit=100 } + service pop3-login { process_limit=500 } + service imap-urlauth-login { process_limit=100 } + service imap-login { process_limit=500 } + service auth { process_limit=1 }
        Dec 29 21:40:15 loaded TLD files:
        Dec 29 21:40:15 1=1445
        Dec 29 21:40:15 2=8416
        Dec 29 21:40:15 3=3642
        Dec 29 21:40:15 loaded 9773 Public Suffixes
        Dec 29 21:40:15 Mail service endpoint listening on http://:::3000
        Dec 29 21:40:15 loglevel: INFO
        Dec 29 21:40:15 log format: DEFAULT
        Dec 29 21:40:15 Starting up Haraka version 3.0.5
        Dec 29 21:40:15 [INFO] [-] [plugins] loading delay_deny
        Dec 29 21:40:15 [INFO] [-] [plugins] loading dns-list
        Dec 29 21:40:15 [INFO] [-] [plugins] loading helo.checks
        Dec 29 21:40:15 [INFO] [-] [plugins] loading headers
        Dec 29 21:40:15 [INFO] [-] [plugins] loading tls
        Dec 29 21:40:15 [INFO] [-] [core] loading tls.ini
        Dec 29 21:40:15 [INFO] [-] [plugins] loading spf
        Dec 29 21:40:15 [INFO] [-] [plugins] loading cloudron
        Dec 29 21:40:15 [INFO] [-] [plugins] loading rcpt_to.in_host_list
        Dec 29 21:40:15 [NOTICE] [-] [plugins] dkim_sign has been replaced by 'dkim'. Please update config/plugins
        Dec 29 21:40:15 [INFO] [-] [plugins] loading dkim
        Dec 29 21:40:15 [INFO] [-] [plugins] loading spamassassin
        Dec 29 21:40:15 [INFO] [-] [plugins] loading queue/smtp_forward
        Dec 29 21:40:15 [INFO] [-] [plugins] loading limit
        Dec 29 21:40:15 [NOTICE] [-] [server] Listening on [::0]:2525
        Dec 29 21:40:15 [INFO] [-] [server] getting SocketOpts for SMTPS server
        Dec 29 21:40:15 TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'loopback_is_rejected')
        Dec 29 21:40:15 at exports.checkZoneNegative (/app/code/haraka/node_modules/haraka-plugin-dns-list/index.js:347:22)
        Dec 29 21:40:15 at exports.check_zone (/app/code/haraka/node_modules/haraka-plugin-dns-list/index.js:372:20)
        Dec 29 21:40:15 at async Promise.all (index 0)
        Dec 29 21:40:15 at async exports.check_zones (/app/code/haraka/node_modules/haraka-plugin-dns-list/index.js:393:5)
        Dec 29 21:40:15 [INFO] [-] [dns-list] will re-test list zones every 30 minutes
        Dec 29 21:40:15 [INFO] [-] [server] Creating TLS server on [::0]:2465
        Dec 29 21:40:15 [NOTICE] [-] [server] Listening on [::0]:2465
        Dec 29 21:40:15 [NOTICE] [-] [server] Listening on [::0]:2587
        Dec 29 21:40:15 [INFO] [-] [cloudron] Initializing queue server on port 6000
        Dec 29 21:40:15 [INFO] [-] [limit] connected to redis://127.0.0.1:6379/4
        Dec 29 21:40:15 [INFO] [-] [outbound/queue] Loading outbound queue from /app/data/haraka-queue
        Dec 29 21:40:15 [INFO] [-] [outbound/queue] Loading the queue...
        Dec 29 21:40:15 [INFO] [-] [outbound/queue] [pid: undefined] 0 files in my delivery queue
        Dec 29 21:40:15 [INFO] [-] [outbound/queue] [pid: undefined] 0 files in my load queue
        Dec 29 21:40:15 [INFO] [-] [outbound/queue] [pid: undefined] 2 files in my temp fail queue
        Dec 29 21:40:16 INFO [main] 05:40:16,091 org.apache.tika.server.core.TikaServerProcess Starting Apache Tika 3.0.0 server
        Dec 29 21:40:16 2024-12-30 05:40:16,311 INFO success: dovecot entered RUNNING state, process has stayed up for > than 1 seconds (startsecs)
        Dec 29 21:40:16 2024-12-30 05:40:16,311 INFO success: haraka entered RUNNING state, process has stayed up for > than 1 seconds (startsecs)
        Dec 29 21:40:16 2024-12-30 05:40:16,311 INFO success: mail-service entered RUNNING state, process has stayed up for > than 1 seconds (startsecs)
        Dec 29 21:40:16 2024-12-30 05:40:16,311 INFO success: redis entered RUNNING state, process has stayed up for > than 1 seconds (startsecs)
        Dec 29 21:40:16 2024-12-30 05:40:16,311 INFO success: solr entered RUNNING state, process has stayed up for > than 1 seconds (startsecs)
        Dec 29 21:40:16 2024-12-30 05:40:16,311 INFO success: spamd entered RUNNING state, process has stayed up for > than 1 seconds (startsecs)
        Dec 29 21:40:16 2024-12-30 05:40:16,311 INFO success: tika entered RUNNING state, process has stayed up for > than 1 seconds (startsecs)
        

        --
        Dustin Dauncey
        www.d19.ca

        1 Reply Last reply
        3
        • d19dotcaD Offline
          d19dotcaD Offline
          d19dotca
          wrote on last edited by
          #13

          Last thing to add... here is a screenshot from Google Postmaster tools which shows that the DKIM success rate went down after the upgrade to Cloudron 8.2.0 when taking into account the event dates.

          image.png

          It seems like Cloudron isn't signing the mail with DKIM signatures at all, as if it's been disabled or something. I think we need this patched ASAP, please. πŸ™

          --
          Dustin Dauncey
          www.d19.ca

          1 Reply Last reply
          4
          • d19dotcaD d19dotca referenced this topic on
          • matix131997M Offline
            matix131997M Offline
            matix131997
            wrote on last edited by
            #14

            I also confirm with myself the problem with DKIM and DMARC, which test says that β€œfrom” does not match the domain.

            I did a test on the site: https://unspam.email/results/uPOw0MP1f2

            1 Reply Last reply
            2
            • matix131997M Offline
              matix131997M Offline
              matix131997
              wrote on last edited by
              #15

              I did a comparison between the e-mail that was sent earlier, before version 8.2.0, and now.

              Before version 8.2.0
              Zrzut ekranu 2024-12-30 o 11.33.08.png
              After 8.2.0
              Zrzut ekranu 2024-12-30 o 11.33.21.png

              1 Reply Last reply
              5
              • robiR Offline
                robiR Offline
                robi
                wrote on last edited by
                #16

                Can someone test toggling the DKIM setup to see if 8.2 can actually set it?
                Or a new sub.domain.. might help narrow it down

                Conscious tech

                1 Reply Last reply
                2
                • matix131997M Offline
                  matix131997M Offline
                  matix131997
                  wrote on last edited by matix131997
                  #17

                  I had a domain that I bought accidentally with the wrong name.

                  Old Domain:
                  OLD DOMAIN.PNG

                  New Domain:
                  NEW DOMAIN.PNG

                  Half of the settings are gone. 😡

                  Records in DNS:
                  Przechwytywanie.PNG

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • robiR Offline
                    robiR Offline
                    robi
                    wrote on last edited by robi
                    #18

                    Did you set up and enable email for the new domain?

                    EDIT: 😏

                    Conscious tech

                    matix131997M 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • robiR robi

                      Did you set up and enable email for the new domain?

                      EDIT: 😏

                      matix131997M Offline
                      matix131997M Offline
                      matix131997
                      wrote on last edited by matix131997
                      #19

                      @robi Yes

                      EDIT: F***, I forgot about that πŸ˜„

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      1
                      • matix131997M Offline
                        matix131997M Offline
                        matix131997
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #20

                        I enabled email. I sent email from that domain and still the same as above. And the records are like this after the launch.
                        Przechwytywanie.PNG

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • robiR Offline
                          robiR Offline
                          robi
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #21

                          Records are fine, does the Cloudron status think they're fine?

                          Does the external test think the records match now?

                          How are the mail headers?

                          Let's not miss any testing steps after making changes..

                          Conscious tech

                          matix131997M 1 Reply Last reply
                          1
                          • d19dotcaD Offline
                            d19dotcaD Offline
                            d19dotca
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #22

                            The Cloudron status shows everything green in my instance. The DNS records are perfectly fine. The issue is the Haraka SMTP service in Cloudron seems to no longer be signing the messages properly so they are missing DKIM signatures.

                            --
                            Dustin Dauncey
                            www.d19.ca

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            4
                            • robiR robi

                              Records are fine, does the Cloudron status think they're fine?

                              Does the external test think the records match now?

                              How are the mail headers?

                              Let's not miss any testing steps after making changes..

                              matix131997M Offline
                              matix131997M Offline
                              matix131997
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #23

                              @robi Yes, all points in the status are in green. Message headers the same as above - post #15

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              2
                              • d19dotcaD Offline
                                d19dotcaD Offline
                                d19dotca
                                wrote on last edited by d19dotca
                                #24

                                @nebulon / @girish , I think unfortunately this is coming down to a defect in 8.2.x where the DKIM signatures are not being used to sign outgoing messages.

                                I'm thinking we will need a patch for that as soon as possible, please as it's having a big impact in connecting to certain mail providers (seems to mostly be Google at the moment but I'm sure others are affected to a degree too). In the meantime, I may need to switch to a different SMTP server / relay service temporarily.

                                If there's anything I can do to help, please let me know. I can offer SSH connection into my server if you require it too. πŸ™‚

                                --
                                Dustin Dauncey
                                www.d19.ca

                                andreasduerenA 1 Reply Last reply
                                5
                                • d19dotcaD d19dotca

                                  @nebulon / @girish , I think unfortunately this is coming down to a defect in 8.2.x where the DKIM signatures are not being used to sign outgoing messages.

                                  I'm thinking we will need a patch for that as soon as possible, please as it's having a big impact in connecting to certain mail providers (seems to mostly be Google at the moment but I'm sure others are affected to a degree too). In the meantime, I may need to switch to a different SMTP server / relay service temporarily.

                                  If there's anything I can do to help, please let me know. I can offer SSH connection into my server if you require it too. πŸ™‚

                                  andreasduerenA Online
                                  andreasduerenA Online
                                  andreasdueren
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #25

                                  @d19dotca said in Hetzner PTR Record Invalid:

                                  @nebulon / @girish , I think unfortunately this is coming down to a defect in 8.2.x where the DKIM signatures are not being used to sign outgoing messages.

                                  I'm thinking we will need a patch for that as soon as possible, please as it's having a big impact in connecting to certain mail providers (seems to mostly be Google at the moment but I'm sure others are affected to a degree too). In the meantime, I may need to switch to a different SMTP server / relay service temporarily.

                                  If there's anything I can do to help, please let me know. I can offer SSH connection into my server if you require it too. πŸ™‚

                                  Of THAT could be the case that I'm currently getting lots of failing DKIM reports

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • J joseph marked this topic as a question on
                                  • girishG Offline
                                    girishG Offline
                                    girish
                                    Staff
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #26

                                    There is indeed a regression with DKIM signing. This is fixed now. Will get a patch release out asap.

                                    KubernetesK 1 Reply Last reply
                                    8
                                    • girishG girish has marked this topic as solved on
                                    • girishG girish

                                      There is indeed a regression with DKIM signing. This is fixed now. Will get a patch release out asap.

                                      KubernetesK Offline
                                      KubernetesK Offline
                                      Kubernetes
                                      App Dev
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #27

                                      @girish Great, thanks and happy new year !

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      1
                                      • d19dotcaD Offline
                                        d19dotcaD Offline
                                        d19dotca
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #28

                                        Hi @girish , any chance that the fix could be released today or tomorrow for those of us on 8.2.x? 🀞

                                        Also I’m sure you already have this being tracked for the future but I wanted to at least write down my suggestion: I think if possible it may be a great time to add some more automated test cases for the email functionality in order to make sure the DKIM signature exists in messages as an example.

                                        --
                                        Dustin Dauncey
                                        www.d19.ca

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        4
                                        • girishG Offline
                                          girishG Offline
                                          girish
                                          Staff
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #29

                                          @d19dotca 8.2.2 is out now and should fix the crash and the DKIM issue. The crash issue is only mildly tested since upstream has not merged it yet, but maybe you can check if that works fine?

                                          avatar1024A KubernetesK 2 Replies Last reply
                                          4
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • Bookmarks
                                          • Search