Cloudron makes it easy to run web apps like WordPress, Nextcloud, GitLab on your server. Find out more or install now.


Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Bookmarks
  • Search
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

Cloudron Forum

Apps | Demo | Docs | Install
  1. Cloudron Forum
  2. Support
  3. Hetzner PTR Record Invalid

Hetzner PTR Record Invalid

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Solved Support
hetznerptr
32 Posts 10 Posters 3.3k Views 10 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • robiR Offline
    robiR Offline
    robi
    wrote on last edited by robi
    #18

    Did you set up and enable email for the new domain?

    EDIT: 😏

    Conscious tech

    matix131997M 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • robiR robi

      Did you set up and enable email for the new domain?

      EDIT: 😏

      matix131997M Offline
      matix131997M Offline
      matix131997
      wrote on last edited by matix131997
      #19

      @robi Yes

      EDIT: F***, I forgot about that 😄

      1 Reply Last reply
      1
      • matix131997M Offline
        matix131997M Offline
        matix131997
        wrote on last edited by
        #20

        I enabled email. I sent email from that domain and still the same as above. And the records are like this after the launch.
        Przechwytywanie.PNG

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • robiR Offline
          robiR Offline
          robi
          wrote on last edited by
          #21

          Records are fine, does the Cloudron status think they're fine?

          Does the external test think the records match now?

          How are the mail headers?

          Let's not miss any testing steps after making changes..

          Conscious tech

          matix131997M 1 Reply Last reply
          1
          • d19dotcaD Offline
            d19dotcaD Offline
            d19dotca
            wrote on last edited by
            #22

            The Cloudron status shows everything green in my instance. The DNS records are perfectly fine. The issue is the Haraka SMTP service in Cloudron seems to no longer be signing the messages properly so they are missing DKIM signatures.

            --
            Dustin Dauncey
            www.d19.ca

            1 Reply Last reply
            4
            • robiR robi

              Records are fine, does the Cloudron status think they're fine?

              Does the external test think the records match now?

              How are the mail headers?

              Let's not miss any testing steps after making changes..

              matix131997M Offline
              matix131997M Offline
              matix131997
              wrote on last edited by
              #23

              @robi Yes, all points in the status are in green. Message headers the same as above - post #15

              1 Reply Last reply
              2
              • d19dotcaD Offline
                d19dotcaD Offline
                d19dotca
                wrote on last edited by d19dotca
                #24

                @nebulon / @girish , I think unfortunately this is coming down to a defect in 8.2.x where the DKIM signatures are not being used to sign outgoing messages.

                I'm thinking we will need a patch for that as soon as possible, please as it's having a big impact in connecting to certain mail providers (seems to mostly be Google at the moment but I'm sure others are affected to a degree too). In the meantime, I may need to switch to a different SMTP server / relay service temporarily.

                If there's anything I can do to help, please let me know. I can offer SSH connection into my server if you require it too. 🙂

                --
                Dustin Dauncey
                www.d19.ca

                andreasduerenA 1 Reply Last reply
                5
                • d19dotcaD d19dotca

                  @nebulon / @girish , I think unfortunately this is coming down to a defect in 8.2.x where the DKIM signatures are not being used to sign outgoing messages.

                  I'm thinking we will need a patch for that as soon as possible, please as it's having a big impact in connecting to certain mail providers (seems to mostly be Google at the moment but I'm sure others are affected to a degree too). In the meantime, I may need to switch to a different SMTP server / relay service temporarily.

                  If there's anything I can do to help, please let me know. I can offer SSH connection into my server if you require it too. 🙂

                  andreasduerenA Offline
                  andreasduerenA Offline
                  andreasdueren
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #25

                  @d19dotca said in Hetzner PTR Record Invalid:

                  @nebulon / @girish , I think unfortunately this is coming down to a defect in 8.2.x where the DKIM signatures are not being used to sign outgoing messages.

                  I'm thinking we will need a patch for that as soon as possible, please as it's having a big impact in connecting to certain mail providers (seems to mostly be Google at the moment but I'm sure others are affected to a degree too). In the meantime, I may need to switch to a different SMTP server / relay service temporarily.

                  If there's anything I can do to help, please let me know. I can offer SSH connection into my server if you require it too. 🙂

                  Of THAT could be the case that I'm currently getting lots of failing DKIM reports

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • J joseph marked this topic as a question on
                  • girishG Offline
                    girishG Offline
                    girish
                    Staff
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #26

                    There is indeed a regression with DKIM signing. This is fixed now. Will get a patch release out asap.

                    KubernetesK 1 Reply Last reply
                    8
                    • girishG girish has marked this topic as solved on
                    • girishG girish

                      There is indeed a regression with DKIM signing. This is fixed now. Will get a patch release out asap.

                      KubernetesK Offline
                      KubernetesK Offline
                      Kubernetes
                      App Dev
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #27

                      @girish Great, thanks and happy new year !

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      1
                      • d19dotcaD Offline
                        d19dotcaD Offline
                        d19dotca
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #28

                        Hi @girish , any chance that the fix could be released today or tomorrow for those of us on 8.2.x? 🤞

                        Also I’m sure you already have this being tracked for the future but I wanted to at least write down my suggestion: I think if possible it may be a great time to add some more automated test cases for the email functionality in order to make sure the DKIM signature exists in messages as an example.

                        --
                        Dustin Dauncey
                        www.d19.ca

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        4
                        • girishG Offline
                          girishG Offline
                          girish
                          Staff
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #29

                          @d19dotca 8.2.2 is out now and should fix the crash and the DKIM issue. The crash issue is only mildly tested since upstream has not merged it yet, but maybe you can check if that works fine?

                          avatar1024A KubernetesK 2 Replies Last reply
                          4
                          • girishG girish

                            @d19dotca 8.2.2 is out now and should fix the crash and the DKIM issue. The crash issue is only mildly tested since upstream has not merged it yet, but maybe you can check if that works fine?

                            avatar1024A Offline
                            avatar1024A Offline
                            avatar1024
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #30

                            @girish said in Hetzner PTR Record Invalid:

                            @d19dotca 8.2.2 is out now and should fix the crash and the DKIM issue. The crash issue is only mildly tested since upstream has not merged it yet, but maybe you can check if that works fine?

                            It works indeed 🙂 thank you for the speedy fix!

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            2
                            • girishG girish

                              @d19dotca 8.2.2 is out now and should fix the crash and the DKIM issue. The crash issue is only mildly tested since upstream has not merged it yet, but maybe you can check if that works fine?

                              KubernetesK Offline
                              KubernetesK Offline
                              Kubernetes
                              App Dev
                              wrote on last edited by Kubernetes
                              #31

                              @girish Great work, thank you very much for the quick fix and release. I just updated and tested and the crash doesn't show up again and DKIM is also working.

                              Always glad to post real defects 🙂

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              5
                              • d19dotcaD Offline
                                d19dotcaD Offline
                                d19dotca
                                wrote on last edited by d19dotca
                                #32

                                Confirmed, it seems to be much better now. Thank you so much for the quick turnaround on that! Great job! 👏

                                https://unspam.email/results/6edDuKodjB

                                --
                                Dustin Dauncey
                                www.d19.ca

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                3
                                Reply
                                • Reply as topic
                                Log in to reply
                                • Oldest to Newest
                                • Newest to Oldest
                                • Most Votes


                                • Login

                                • Don't have an account? Register

                                • Login or register to search.
                                • First post
                                  Last post
                                0
                                • Categories
                                • Recent
                                • Tags
                                • Popular
                                • Bookmarks
                                • Search