Cloudron makes it easy to run web apps like WordPress, Nextcloud, GitLab on your server. Find out more or install now.


Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Bookmarks
  • Search
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

Cloudron Forum

Apps | Demo | Docs | Install
  1. Cloudron Forum
  2. Support
  3. Hetzner PTR Record Invalid

Hetzner PTR Record Invalid

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Solved Support
hetznerptr
32 Posts 10 Posters 4.2k Views 10 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • d19dotcaD Offline
    d19dotcaD Offline
    d19dotca
    wrote on last edited by
    #12

    Not sure if related, but I do see DKIM mentioned as being replaced, and unsure if this is part of the reason or not. Maybe a reach but wanted to share this in case:

    Dec 29 21:40:15 70:M 30 Dec 2024 05:40:15.252 * Server initialized
    Dec 29 21:40:15 70:M 30 Dec 2024 05:40:15.252 * Ready to accept connections tcp
    Dec 29 21:40:15 doveconf: Warning: service auth { client_limit=1000 } is lower than required under max. load (1300). Counted for protocol services with service_count != 1: service managesieve-login { process_limit=100 } + service pop3-login { process_limit=500 } + service lmtp { process_limit=100 } + service imap-urlauth-login { process_limit=100 } + service imap-login { process_limit=500 }
    Dec 29 21:40:15 doveconf: Warning: service anvil { client_limit=1000 } is lower than required under max. load (1203). Counted with: service managesieve-login { process_limit=100 } + service pop3-login { process_limit=500 } + service imap-urlauth-login { process_limit=100 } + service imap-login { process_limit=500 } + service auth { process_limit=1 }
    Dec 29 21:40:15 Warning: service auth { client_limit=1000 } is lower than required under max. load (1300). Counted for protocol services with service_count != 1: service managesieve-login { process_limit=100 } + service pop3-login { process_limit=500 } + service lmtp { process_limit=100 } + service imap-urlauth-login { process_limit=100 } + service imap-login { process_limit=500 }
    Dec 29 21:40:15 Warning: service anvil { client_limit=1000 } is lower than required under max. load (1203). Counted with: service managesieve-login { process_limit=100 } + service pop3-login { process_limit=500 } + service imap-urlauth-login { process_limit=100 } + service imap-login { process_limit=500 } + service auth { process_limit=1 }
    Dec 29 21:40:15 loaded TLD files:
    Dec 29 21:40:15 1=1445
    Dec 29 21:40:15 2=8416
    Dec 29 21:40:15 3=3642
    Dec 29 21:40:15 loaded 9773 Public Suffixes
    Dec 29 21:40:15 Mail service endpoint listening on http://:::3000
    Dec 29 21:40:15 loglevel: INFO
    Dec 29 21:40:15 log format: DEFAULT
    Dec 29 21:40:15 Starting up Haraka version 3.0.5
    Dec 29 21:40:15 [INFO] [-] [plugins] loading delay_deny
    Dec 29 21:40:15 [INFO] [-] [plugins] loading dns-list
    Dec 29 21:40:15 [INFO] [-] [plugins] loading helo.checks
    Dec 29 21:40:15 [INFO] [-] [plugins] loading headers
    Dec 29 21:40:15 [INFO] [-] [plugins] loading tls
    Dec 29 21:40:15 [INFO] [-] [core] loading tls.ini
    Dec 29 21:40:15 [INFO] [-] [plugins] loading spf
    Dec 29 21:40:15 [INFO] [-] [plugins] loading cloudron
    Dec 29 21:40:15 [INFO] [-] [plugins] loading rcpt_to.in_host_list
    Dec 29 21:40:15 [NOTICE] [-] [plugins] dkim_sign has been replaced by 'dkim'. Please update config/plugins
    Dec 29 21:40:15 [INFO] [-] [plugins] loading dkim
    Dec 29 21:40:15 [INFO] [-] [plugins] loading spamassassin
    Dec 29 21:40:15 [INFO] [-] [plugins] loading queue/smtp_forward
    Dec 29 21:40:15 [INFO] [-] [plugins] loading limit
    Dec 29 21:40:15 [NOTICE] [-] [server] Listening on [::0]:2525
    Dec 29 21:40:15 [INFO] [-] [server] getting SocketOpts for SMTPS server
    Dec 29 21:40:15 TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'loopback_is_rejected')
    Dec 29 21:40:15 at exports.checkZoneNegative (/app/code/haraka/node_modules/haraka-plugin-dns-list/index.js:347:22)
    Dec 29 21:40:15 at exports.check_zone (/app/code/haraka/node_modules/haraka-plugin-dns-list/index.js:372:20)
    Dec 29 21:40:15 at async Promise.all (index 0)
    Dec 29 21:40:15 at async exports.check_zones (/app/code/haraka/node_modules/haraka-plugin-dns-list/index.js:393:5)
    Dec 29 21:40:15 [INFO] [-] [dns-list] will re-test list zones every 30 minutes
    Dec 29 21:40:15 [INFO] [-] [server] Creating TLS server on [::0]:2465
    Dec 29 21:40:15 [NOTICE] [-] [server] Listening on [::0]:2465
    Dec 29 21:40:15 [NOTICE] [-] [server] Listening on [::0]:2587
    Dec 29 21:40:15 [INFO] [-] [cloudron] Initializing queue server on port 6000
    Dec 29 21:40:15 [INFO] [-] [limit] connected to redis://127.0.0.1:6379/4
    Dec 29 21:40:15 [INFO] [-] [outbound/queue] Loading outbound queue from /app/data/haraka-queue
    Dec 29 21:40:15 [INFO] [-] [outbound/queue] Loading the queue...
    Dec 29 21:40:15 [INFO] [-] [outbound/queue] [pid: undefined] 0 files in my delivery queue
    Dec 29 21:40:15 [INFO] [-] [outbound/queue] [pid: undefined] 0 files in my load queue
    Dec 29 21:40:15 [INFO] [-] [outbound/queue] [pid: undefined] 2 files in my temp fail queue
    Dec 29 21:40:16 INFO [main] 05:40:16,091 org.apache.tika.server.core.TikaServerProcess Starting Apache Tika 3.0.0 server
    Dec 29 21:40:16 2024-12-30 05:40:16,311 INFO success: dovecot entered RUNNING state, process has stayed up for > than 1 seconds (startsecs)
    Dec 29 21:40:16 2024-12-30 05:40:16,311 INFO success: haraka entered RUNNING state, process has stayed up for > than 1 seconds (startsecs)
    Dec 29 21:40:16 2024-12-30 05:40:16,311 INFO success: mail-service entered RUNNING state, process has stayed up for > than 1 seconds (startsecs)
    Dec 29 21:40:16 2024-12-30 05:40:16,311 INFO success: redis entered RUNNING state, process has stayed up for > than 1 seconds (startsecs)
    Dec 29 21:40:16 2024-12-30 05:40:16,311 INFO success: solr entered RUNNING state, process has stayed up for > than 1 seconds (startsecs)
    Dec 29 21:40:16 2024-12-30 05:40:16,311 INFO success: spamd entered RUNNING state, process has stayed up for > than 1 seconds (startsecs)
    Dec 29 21:40:16 2024-12-30 05:40:16,311 INFO success: tika entered RUNNING state, process has stayed up for > than 1 seconds (startsecs)
    

    --
    Dustin Dauncey
    www.d19.ca

    1 Reply Last reply
    3
    • d19dotcaD Offline
      d19dotcaD Offline
      d19dotca
      wrote on last edited by
      #13

      Last thing to add... here is a screenshot from Google Postmaster tools which shows that the DKIM success rate went down after the upgrade to Cloudron 8.2.0 when taking into account the event dates.

      image.png

      It seems like Cloudron isn't signing the mail with DKIM signatures at all, as if it's been disabled or something. I think we need this patched ASAP, please. πŸ™

      --
      Dustin Dauncey
      www.d19.ca

      1 Reply Last reply
      4
      • d19dotcaD d19dotca referenced this topic on
      • matix131997M Offline
        matix131997M Offline
        matix131997
        wrote on last edited by
        #14

        I also confirm with myself the problem with DKIM and DMARC, which test says that β€œfrom” does not match the domain.

        I did a test on the site: https://unspam.email/results/uPOw0MP1f2

        1 Reply Last reply
        2
        • matix131997M Offline
          matix131997M Offline
          matix131997
          wrote on last edited by
          #15

          I did a comparison between the e-mail that was sent earlier, before version 8.2.0, and now.

          Before version 8.2.0
          Zrzut ekranu 2024-12-30 o 11.33.08.png
          After 8.2.0
          Zrzut ekranu 2024-12-30 o 11.33.21.png

          1 Reply Last reply
          5
          • robiR Offline
            robiR Offline
            robi
            wrote on last edited by
            #16

            Can someone test toggling the DKIM setup to see if 8.2 can actually set it?
            Or a new sub.domain.. might help narrow it down

            Conscious tech

            1 Reply Last reply
            2
            • matix131997M Offline
              matix131997M Offline
              matix131997
              wrote on last edited by matix131997
              #17

              I had a domain that I bought accidentally with the wrong name.

              Old Domain:
              OLD DOMAIN.PNG

              New Domain:
              NEW DOMAIN.PNG

              Half of the settings are gone. 😡

              Records in DNS:
              Przechwytywanie.PNG

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • robiR Offline
                robiR Offline
                robi
                wrote on last edited by robi
                #18

                Did you set up and enable email for the new domain?

                EDIT: 😏

                Conscious tech

                matix131997M 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • robiR robi

                  Did you set up and enable email for the new domain?

                  EDIT: 😏

                  matix131997M Offline
                  matix131997M Offline
                  matix131997
                  wrote on last edited by matix131997
                  #19

                  @robi Yes

                  EDIT: F***, I forgot about that πŸ˜„

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  1
                  • matix131997M Offline
                    matix131997M Offline
                    matix131997
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #20

                    I enabled email. I sent email from that domain and still the same as above. And the records are like this after the launch.
                    Przechwytywanie.PNG

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • robiR Offline
                      robiR Offline
                      robi
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #21

                      Records are fine, does the Cloudron status think they're fine?

                      Does the external test think the records match now?

                      How are the mail headers?

                      Let's not miss any testing steps after making changes..

                      Conscious tech

                      matix131997M 1 Reply Last reply
                      1
                      • d19dotcaD Offline
                        d19dotcaD Offline
                        d19dotca
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #22

                        The Cloudron status shows everything green in my instance. The DNS records are perfectly fine. The issue is the Haraka SMTP service in Cloudron seems to no longer be signing the messages properly so they are missing DKIM signatures.

                        --
                        Dustin Dauncey
                        www.d19.ca

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        4
                        • robiR robi

                          Records are fine, does the Cloudron status think they're fine?

                          Does the external test think the records match now?

                          How are the mail headers?

                          Let's not miss any testing steps after making changes..

                          matix131997M Offline
                          matix131997M Offline
                          matix131997
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #23

                          @robi Yes, all points in the status are in green. Message headers the same as above - post #15

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          2
                          • d19dotcaD Offline
                            d19dotcaD Offline
                            d19dotca
                            wrote on last edited by d19dotca
                            #24

                            @nebulon / @girish , I think unfortunately this is coming down to a defect in 8.2.x where the DKIM signatures are not being used to sign outgoing messages.

                            I'm thinking we will need a patch for that as soon as possible, please as it's having a big impact in connecting to certain mail providers (seems to mostly be Google at the moment but I'm sure others are affected to a degree too). In the meantime, I may need to switch to a different SMTP server / relay service temporarily.

                            If there's anything I can do to help, please let me know. I can offer SSH connection into my server if you require it too. πŸ™‚

                            --
                            Dustin Dauncey
                            www.d19.ca

                            andreasduerenA 1 Reply Last reply
                            5
                            • d19dotcaD d19dotca

                              @nebulon / @girish , I think unfortunately this is coming down to a defect in 8.2.x where the DKIM signatures are not being used to sign outgoing messages.

                              I'm thinking we will need a patch for that as soon as possible, please as it's having a big impact in connecting to certain mail providers (seems to mostly be Google at the moment but I'm sure others are affected to a degree too). In the meantime, I may need to switch to a different SMTP server / relay service temporarily.

                              If there's anything I can do to help, please let me know. I can offer SSH connection into my server if you require it too. πŸ™‚

                              andreasduerenA Offline
                              andreasduerenA Offline
                              andreasdueren
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #25

                              @d19dotca said in Hetzner PTR Record Invalid:

                              @nebulon / @girish , I think unfortunately this is coming down to a defect in 8.2.x where the DKIM signatures are not being used to sign outgoing messages.

                              I'm thinking we will need a patch for that as soon as possible, please as it's having a big impact in connecting to certain mail providers (seems to mostly be Google at the moment but I'm sure others are affected to a degree too). In the meantime, I may need to switch to a different SMTP server / relay service temporarily.

                              If there's anything I can do to help, please let me know. I can offer SSH connection into my server if you require it too. πŸ™‚

                              Of THAT could be the case that I'm currently getting lots of failing DKIM reports

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • J joseph marked this topic as a question on
                              • girishG Offline
                                girishG Offline
                                girish
                                Staff
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #26

                                There is indeed a regression with DKIM signing. This is fixed now. Will get a patch release out asap.

                                KubernetesK 1 Reply Last reply
                                8
                                • girishG girish has marked this topic as solved on
                                • girishG girish

                                  There is indeed a regression with DKIM signing. This is fixed now. Will get a patch release out asap.

                                  KubernetesK Offline
                                  KubernetesK Offline
                                  Kubernetes
                                  App Dev
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #27

                                  @girish Great, thanks and happy new year !

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  1
                                  • d19dotcaD Offline
                                    d19dotcaD Offline
                                    d19dotca
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #28

                                    Hi @girish , any chance that the fix could be released today or tomorrow for those of us on 8.2.x? 🀞

                                    Also I’m sure you already have this being tracked for the future but I wanted to at least write down my suggestion: I think if possible it may be a great time to add some more automated test cases for the email functionality in order to make sure the DKIM signature exists in messages as an example.

                                    --
                                    Dustin Dauncey
                                    www.d19.ca

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    4
                                    • girishG Offline
                                      girishG Offline
                                      girish
                                      Staff
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #29

                                      @d19dotca 8.2.2 is out now and should fix the crash and the DKIM issue. The crash issue is only mildly tested since upstream has not merged it yet, but maybe you can check if that works fine?

                                      avatar1024A KubernetesK 2 Replies Last reply
                                      4
                                      • girishG girish

                                        @d19dotca 8.2.2 is out now and should fix the crash and the DKIM issue. The crash issue is only mildly tested since upstream has not merged it yet, but maybe you can check if that works fine?

                                        avatar1024A Offline
                                        avatar1024A Offline
                                        avatar1024
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #30

                                        @girish said in Hetzner PTR Record Invalid:

                                        @d19dotca 8.2.2 is out now and should fix the crash and the DKIM issue. The crash issue is only mildly tested since upstream has not merged it yet, but maybe you can check if that works fine?

                                        It works indeed πŸ™‚ thank you for the speedy fix!

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        2
                                        • girishG girish

                                          @d19dotca 8.2.2 is out now and should fix the crash and the DKIM issue. The crash issue is only mildly tested since upstream has not merged it yet, but maybe you can check if that works fine?

                                          KubernetesK Offline
                                          KubernetesK Offline
                                          Kubernetes
                                          App Dev
                                          wrote on last edited by Kubernetes
                                          #31

                                          @girish Great work, thank you very much for the quick fix and release. I just updated and tested and the crash doesn't show up again and DKIM is also working.

                                          Always glad to post real defects πŸ™‚

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          5
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • Bookmarks
                                          • Search