@nebulon said in Add ability to switch users in the Dashboard: You cannot be logged in with different users within the same session into the OpenID provider. Well, (as per the link I shared) seemingly somehow I did manage to do that. I was logged into my dashboard as jdaviescoates, then I logged out and I was already logged in as uniteddiversity @nebulon said in Add ability to switch users in the Dashboard: So if an app has its own session handling, it is now independent from the OpenID provider session, so you could logout from that, and relogin with another user. That is the thing that currently actually seems impossible to do with lots of apps (e.g. Mastodon) on Cloudron at present (if you log out and then try to login again, it just logs you back in as the user you just logged out as).

Given that those values are not exact anyways giving the user a false feeling is also wrong. I guess https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTML/Element/input/range has the wording indicating the widget is the correct one to use here: Because this kind of widget is imprecise, it should only be used if the control's exact value isn't important.

@BetterWP a workaround for now till we update our base image is : In web terminal: mkdir -p /app/data/jpegoptim cd /app/data/jpegoptim wget https://github.com/tjko/jpegoptim/releases/download/v1.5.5/jpegoptim-1.5.5-x64-linux.zip unzip jpegoptim-1.5.5-x64-linux.zip chmod +x jpegoptim ./jpegoptim --help

@Lanhild Thanks!!

https://www.cloudron.io/get.html [image: 1709745581798-9372718d-527e-405f-a6f9-865c87ec5920-image-resized.png]

@girish Seems like the package dependencies are all PHP related (php php-cli php-soap php-mbstring php-imap libawl-php php-curl php-xml php-ldap). I searched on one of my Ubuntu 22.04 LTS instances and all packages were available. I don't have Ubuntu 23 so I can't check that version specifically. Given these are fairly standard libs I would hope they will be available in subsequent Ubuntu releases (23+). FYI, installation details are here for Ubuntu 22.04: https://github.com/Z-Hub/Z-Push/wiki/Installation#Z-Push-on-Ubuntu-2204.

Yeah, I was going to say the same as @girish - it's already possible both to extract files and to change ownership. However, this is a quirk that I think could be improved: If I upload a .zip it gets www-data ownership. But then after extracting it the extracted folder is owned by root and then needs changing to www-data. It's be better if it was just www-data in the first place.

@Lanhild yes, the health value is obtained from the healthcheck. We have a "health checker" which polls apps every 10 seconds . If the app responds to the healtcheck attribute, it gets the state 'healthy'. If it didn't respond, it waits for around 20 mins to mark it as 'unhealthy'.

See https://forum.cloudron.io/post/83924

@jdaviescoates yes, first by label if it exists. If label doesn't exist, then fqdn.

Fixed for next release with https://git.cloudron.io/cloudron/box/-/commit/8e4506382d77e1a167096012c5aebb4ad7cc8f79

@girish said in Make Cloudron Restore dialog more Human friendly: Is there any easy fix which does not involved coding? Yes, have the pattern available in the textbox so it's obvious what is expected. It's more the "backup date/box ver file" than just a "path".

@robi said in Is it possible to back up the software of an app but not its data?: you can always install older versions of apps by specifying the version number in the App store @girish said in Is it possible to back up the software of an app but not its data?: @scooke there is no need to back up the code. Cloudron packaging methodology means that code is immutable (readonly). Everyone is using the same code and the code is stored in the docker hub images. What they said Hence why I asked as that was my understanding

I do not know, if this may be also interesting, so I just add the link. I noted it because it talks about private pki which might be interesting in my job but I personally don't need it. https://cert-manager.io

I will mark this as solved. LDAP standard hasn't moved to support 2FA and neither have apps settled on a pseudo standard. There is not much we can do.