Cloudron Forum

@scooke Just chill man. @eddowding is not alone in thinking that way.

Nobody has said that Cloudron would fail.

We are just business owners that have hope that Cloudron become bigger and add more business-oriented apps. We want their success and we are here to encourage them to pursuit that path.

If they speak out loud and simply tell us they are not interested to grow that much, fine. We'll respect their decisions.

But if they are, they have a big community behind them that is ready to continue submitting feedback and even agreed to pay an extra (if required) on their subscriptions to allow the Cloudron team to expand and add more business apps.

I have no idea why some people here try to defend Cloudron due to that post?! This is everything but negative.

I initially created this post to show my interest in having more business apps and many others agreed with me. This simply means that the interests are shared among multiple users and that my feedback should be considered seriously.

To those who are not interested, why are you losing your time posting here? I'm just not getting the point. Cloudron has many different audiences from businesses to personal. If you are not targeted by this, just move on.

I think this topic is more suitable in N8N discussion since this can be achieved by integrating any AI agent through webhook to custom chat interface

Maybe this was not clear from the start, on Cloudron all apps are pre-setup with databases already. The databases are also managed by the platform instead of the apps to allow proper backup points amongst other things.

@timconsidine Yes I have no doubt it requires a lot of times.

My point is that the apps added are so random... You try to please everyone but the paid subscription is more adapted to business users.

If you would focus on adding more apps that can help business growth and save money, you would have much more paid users.

I own many businesses and there are a lot of open source apps that can help us scale and minimize our costs. Some have been voted many times here, but despite this, they never been added.

I understand you may want to prioritize simpler apps to manage but is it the main point of paying Cloudron, to get complex apps fully managed?

I have seen a lot of users posting on this forum and say they would pay a higher subscription to have access to more business-oriented apps but all these replies seem ignored.

I'm not saying increase your price (pls folks don't throw me rocks lol) but if you limit good apps just because you feel we don't pay enough to justify the maintenance costs, then I believe you should really considering a new plan that give access to those premium apps. What you have to lose doing this? For a business paying 30$ or 40$ it's nothing. More revenue for you, make your business users happy.

Seem a win-win.

@igaudette If you would like to propose any of these for Cloudron, you should create individual App Requests for the ones you want, rather than lumping them in together.

The Open Web UI project initially started out as a Ollama frontend. To run local models, one needs GPU support and Cloudron currently does not have GPU support. Over time, Open Web UI has shifed to be a frontend for OpenAI API compatible services . It is also now possible to configure Ollama in another computer which has a GPU and then point Open Web UI to use that Ollama.

I guess we can mark this as stable since it's still useful while we figure out GPU support in Cloudron.

Great thanks @joseph ! Will do that and keep you posted 🙂