@marcusquinn said in Dashboard: Customize buttons on the sides of apps: How about a Grid view of My Apps for users and a List view for Admins with more room for shortcut icons? I feel like this deserves it's own feature request thread. I like it as it mirrors fairly standard desktop file manager options to swap between icon and list views. And list view could display lots more details like in file browsers too.

@timconsidine Filters already help here for those with lots of apps. I also suggested a more compact list view: https://forum.cloudron.io/topic/3465/dashboard-customize-buttons-on-the-sides-of-apps/4?_=1608519749716

@Benoit said in Create app "packages" for 'managed' cloudrons: It could be a manageable app store by the super admin of the cloudron. He could hide the default app store for non technical clients and choose what apps need to be accessible with a customization on the description of these apps. it could be an interface with toggle buttons to activate or deactivate some apps. And you can choose the text you want to show for each app activated. the process to install would be the same. Be careful for me in the back, it is the same app store but it is the front what is different and more compatible with newbies and non tech users. Certainly, this is another way of seeing and doing things to accomplish this, and it's great ideas as well. That's the reason for such forum and how genius software are created. We have here a crowd of people with amazing backgrounds of all sorts and it's the main reason we've a rich community. it is a big improvement but it does not seem impossible to do for super @girish ;). Perhaps i don't see all the difficulties it could engage. Anyway it could be a more comprehensible interface to help the onboarding of new users. Ah, you're conscious all is possible with @girish right?

@robi I decided to move both, appsdata and boxdata.

Where is this slated release wise?

@girish said in Hiding superadmin to deliver 'managed' cloudron to clients.: @micmc said in Hiding superadmin to deliver 'managed' cloudron to clients.: And I guess, that is what would or should happen if we choose to hide the owner. I haven't thought really about this one but yeah, well thought and that should the be case also indeed, the superuser would not be seen in apps as well. We had this idea of creating a "service account" - https://git.cloudron.io/cloudron/box/-/issues/771 (which is scheduled for 7.3). I think this will get you this feature. This is how we see how great minds encounter! Also, there's the discussion about the "email admin" role to which your issue above refers too as well, which several of us have followed as well, which have popped several ideas and views as well and has brought to the creation of such feature.

@girish Yes there is. .ipfs is not a "normal" TLD. It's for websites which are on IPFS, which is an alternate decentralized protocol. Kinda like .onion domains for serving websites on tor. However, i don't really know how cloudron could support it, as I believe it does not use standard http/s at all, so regular apps would not work.

@nebulon woohoo! Thank you

I still really want to be able to filter apps by LDAP support

@fbartels I hear ya, not the main use case, but the subsetting feature with starting a new DB from previous prod data is the killer feature here.

@3246 yes, kind of like a torrent file where you can select priority per file/dir and which ones to skip. not sure a pause is needed, but more like a pre-start selection. I'm sure @staff can enumerate mail and other core services as required items but with flexible priority/order. Not only that, but while we're pondering that manual selection process with manual clicks, the essential bits can already be restored and ready for the next prioritized components.

How much of this will change with Multi-Cloudron?

@d19dotca I'm excited by the potential for https://ntfy.sh. Maybe a cloudron official instance which sets up channels for all customers, so cloudron-generated notifications can be delivered to a customer. Or maybe there's a better way. I just think ntfy.sh is so easy to implement into scripts.

@tamayers yes this should be nice to set scan just only for where is write and read file. Not docker configure.

This will be part of 7.2.1

This is now implemented and will be part of the next release.

@d19dotca that is also because Nginx uses FPM and not FastCGI(Apache in some cases can use FPM) for PHP, which give already a good boost. NextCloud and WP could take good advantage of it, and Nginx could help solve the issue of the main image being too "fatty" It's easy to use Nginx in a multi-layer image.