This seems a very specific corner-case, and I think we will aim for a less cluttered UI. If you have a lot of addresses there maybe the mailbox export feature can help you? It exports the meta data

I'm not a provider so my use-case would be notes for my family. I finally got them used to going to the dashboard to access all the apps instead of asking me, "what was the link to x app?". Having a place where I can leave them notes would be awesome. For example, which login do I use for x app? Some are LDAP, some apps have their own user management, so that's one thing I can mention in there.

@alwynispat I will move this to a feature request.

@ccfu Yes.

@humptydumpty Did the same with the milk the other day, after a long exasperating hunt, found in the cereal cupboard!

@necrevistonnezr said in Support Troubleshooter - Level 1:

The first step was to make the tool actually known 🙂

tada.wav

I personally use a boilerplate.
I have a number of trusted plugins I use on each install, so I just recently set up a templated app on a crazy subdomain and then clone and edit.

I also hope that this feature will be implemented soon to prevent servers from ending up on blacklists. It will also help prevent users from sending mass emails without coordination. Virtually every mail provider has enabled this feature for good reason.

I definitely see the need for something like this that is system-wide and not just mailbox specific as I originally thought

The oidc addon for apps already has group restriction support, however for external apps, this is not implemented. Technically it can be added so I will move this thread to feature requests section.

Something like Crowdsec is surely a step in the right direction. Unfortunately I do not know enough about security to write the guide on configuring these solutions. However - I know enough to know that it is desperately needed. Especially for SMB and Enterprise applications.

In general - Wouldn't it be nice to have a control center where you can know who is accessing your server, what they are doing, and if anything suspicious is going on?

@timconsidine Well, I don't know if Cloudron's dev are facing to "dev resources" problems, maybe you know more about that.

I only posted a "feature suggestion", far from wanting to "drain" development resources.

This would be very useful!

@Mad_Mattho If you detail your manual configuration, it will help the @staff to see the workflow.

@Lonkle He's alive! Where you been for 2 years?

Ah so that's a blocker to get this working on the community version. Thanks

@scooke ha ha, no worries. We are just trying to understand your concerns really and if there is something we need to be concerned about if/when we implement this. Some of the other providers seem to have unicode field for domains already and our UI seems lagging behind here. I understand some of your concerns though like the homograph attack.

Magic, thank you !