Cloudron Forum

Hello @admin-0 Currently no. But, let me get back to you on that. We might be able to push the other version vor 1.20 as well to avoid this struggle.

I'm running my own setup using PowerDNS Authoritative API for many years now, and I use the very simple PowerDNS WebUI. The entirety of it is a single HTML page. I have it protected with Basic auth, after which the PowerDNS API route gets the X-API key injected automatically. That helps me to separate user auth from server auth. When packaged for Cloudron, I would imagine the frontend would be put behind the auth proxy. That might be the simplest possible set-up. However, it would effectively be single-user in the sense that every user can see and modify all domains on the PowerDNS instance. PowerDNS-Admin and so on would indeed be a good option if true multi-user is required, but also requires quite a bit more packaging and maintenance efforts. This package however seems to be in maintenance mode and is in the process of being replaced by a seemingly way more complex system called dnsmin. .

Since I've run a PowerDNS Authoritative DNS for quite a while now, I've been interested in this feature as well. Cloudron not supporting this is the only thing that has prevented me to move my cloudron-managed domains away from cloud providers. I've made several private integrations with the API in the past, but Javascript has held me back from trying my hand at this for Cloudron. Now, with the help of an LLM, I probably have a working implementation. At least it looks good from the API calls perspective. So I have two questions for staff: How can I test it (preferably on a fresh VM, so as to not put my production Cloudron in jeopardy)? I could not really find build/test/deploy instructions in the box repo. Would you be interested in this implementation if it is tested and works? If you are, I fully intend to give you this code under the terms of your license as show in the box repo. It's in a private repo for now since I seem to have lost the account I once had on git.cloudron.io. Thank you in advance!

Hello @dev-cb That is great to read! Thank you very much for the verfication.

@imc67 So were we using the same rules from @d19dotca ? For now I removed from all istances, but in future I want to keep only rules who works in local, not requiring any outbound connection.

@nebulon sounds like over reliance on confused AIs to me.

Seems like for some unknown reason putting the app in debug mode and back out of debug mode fixed it.

Just a follow up with a ping @sirfichi to maybe get down to the issue.

@james Thanks for the quick response! I started out with the SSO option because I prefer it, but user invites were failing to go through the create account flow. They received an e-mail, but when clicking the link to create the account it took them straight to the sign-in page.

Hello @dimtar Currently, there is no Cloudron build in method for that. You can always put a firewall in front of Cloudron and only allow access via a certain IP-Addresses ranges or a VPN. See https://docs.cloudron.io/installation/home-server and https://docs.cloudron.io/installation/intranet . You can run a completely firewalled installation with valid SSL certs.

This is now fixed for the next release with https://git.cloudron.io/platform/box/-/commit/a4ea80cf5eb26b08462430111e8b6f75175e749d

Hello @murgero Did you attempt to use the MAS app with your current matrix server? If so, I think a migration needs to be done which we did not look into yet. See: https://forum.cloudron.io/topic/15013/element-server-suite/16

Hello @james yes i found it. auto update was turned off so i updated now. Thank you.

Thank you it worked.