Cloudron Forum

Should I try updating this 600 and see if that allows the key to be used?

@james thank you for the clarification and the link! Do I understand correctly, that proxyAuth add-on will respect the Access Control setting of the app and allow access only to the allowed users via their Cloudron authentication? The target app may want the extra auth then but that is fine. Is there a way to add proxyAuth for the existing app? I do understand that documentation says it is impossible, but what if we have quite a big data already in the app that we want to protect and we are not able to just run a fresh install? p.s. Just as a side note, what is the best way to isolate the particular app from the public interface? This will allow us to be able to hide any app without clear reinstall with proxyAuth. This public-interface disabling also would come handy if we wanted the app to only be allowed on the VPC interface (i.e. on our ZeroTier network, but not on the public).

@james Thank you for pointing to this file. It's incredible to me that in 2025, with all the security issues around, that they decide to drop such a feature. This sounds inherently insecure. Astonishing! I followed your advice and established a new user and proceeded to delete the old admin user. Thank you for this suggestion. To other users of this app - they decided to call the admin role "Can manage settings and invite members, with full administrative access" instead of calling it "admin".

@AartJansen Looks like they now fully and openly abandoned the open source model which means users will likely have to migrate to other solutions.

@joseph excellent work. Seems like it was designed for an RPM distro.

The fix for this to clear the search filter on ESC if the view is active: https://git.cloudron.io/platform/box/-/commit/425e196dfc4f4c7e31870f36df7cab0417f7a523

@archos Did this occur while upgrading from Cloudron 8 into the 9 series?

@FrenchyBear @tecbox and you got the same error message but the issues were totally different. The fix I posted was for S3 (used by @tecbox). In your case, you are using gcs. It's a slightly bigger fix - https://git.cloudron.io/platform/box/-/commit/99c14533a5930a6175630b6c299a577d64f2decb . You can get the raw file from https://git.cloudron.io/platform/box/-/raw/99c14533a5930a6175630b6c299a577d64f2decb/src/storage/gcs.js and replace /home/yellowtent/box/src/storage/gcs.js .

OpenCloud uses the slogan “Web Office - Productive Teamwork” in the Features section of its website. Below or next to it, you can see a screenshot. This screenshot shows the Collabora Online logo. Therefore, you should look into how you can activate/integrate Collabora Online in OpenCloud. I don't use OpenCloud yet, but I would assume that you have to enter the information about your Collabora instance in the settings. [image: 1764853031574-2025-12-04-13.56.40-www.collaboraonline.com-7dcb1af60b8c-resized.jpg]

Haven't encountered such timeouts from thunderbird, unless the network is actually flaky. Maybe check if both ipv4 and ipv6 are setup but only one works? Could be that thunderbird (probably relying on the system's network interface selector) sometimes picks one of the two which resolves but does not route.

I hear that and I appreciate the work that has been done on both Cloudron as well as Stirling-PDF's part (the new version looks like quite the upgrade). However, it does not gives me clarity on where things stands with regards to OIDC/SSO enable instances, which are now subject to the change. If I am to try to make sense of this, the new version of Stirling-PDF comes with changes of the following order: Either you stick to an unlicensed/free-licensed private instance (requiring log-in) you get 5 user max you still do not get seamless authentication (SSO) with your OIDC/OAuth provider you do not get access to advance/enterprise features, but only basic ones (the definition of which I am not certain of, for now as well as future release) Or you change to a licensed private instance the price is either per month per server (83,25 Euro - No SSO) or per month per user (6,67 Euro - SSO included) This is a steep steep price increase compared to the prior version of the software / previous license. you get access to advanced feature Or you get to run a public instance with no login requirement possible performance impact on server degraded security access to only basic features. is it still limited to 5 concurrent users? Don't get me wrong - I understand the predicament for open-source developers to make a living. However I do think a different approach, both taking care of the situation set by previous license conditions, as well as, not price-locking features that were previously free would have greatly changed the perception of this situation - We are now clearly in the ssotax.org category here. This also sets a precedent in handling this type of situation, which does not inspire the best of confidence for the future ones. At this stage, unfortunately, I cannot recommend this software anymore, nor can I continue using it/providing it to my users/customers. Sad face.

ohh yes thanks Cloudflare proxying is on. Turned off and all appears again- although I cannot quite work out exactly what is blocking it in cloudflare