Cloudron doesn't have a social media scheduling tool in its app catalogue, so let me suggest one - Postiz
The app is written in NodeJS using Postgres and can be self-hosted.
It connects to all major platforms. It is quite new, though, so no information about how well it will be supported.
Here is the link to the website.
[EDITED by Mod]
Summary:
Firecrawl (https://www.firecrawl.dev) is a web scraping tool that prepares data in LLM-readable format that can be self-hosted.
Crawl and convert any website into LLM-ready markdown or structured data. Built by Mendable.ai and the Firecrawl community. Includes powerful scraping, crawling and data extraction capabilities.
This repository is in its early development stages. We are still merging custom modules in the mono repo. It's not completely yet ready for full self-host deployment, but you can already run it locally.
My feature request is that Cloudron should offer backups as a provider itself for an additional fee. Hear me out.
This is why I think it would be a good idea:
Here is why I would use Cloudron backup instead of one of the existing providers:
A solution integrated into Cloudron could be easier to set up, more affordable than alternatives and be a good business opportunity to increase the amount of money it makes from existing clients (optionally).
That's why I think Cloudron should consider adding integrated Backups.
For all developers who work with large language models and prompts, there are graphical user interfaces that can make life easier.
Dify.ai is especially good and, that's the best part, it can be self-hosted.
Self-hosting documentation: https://docs.dify.ai/getting-started/install-self-hosted
Feature overview:
I searched for a long time for a good open solution, and came to the conclusion that this is my favourite.
I would love to see this on cloudron and maybe other developers who work with LLMs might agree.
@nebulon I can't share the original document publicly, unfortunately, but the problem has disappeared after having raised the PHP Memory Limit in Nextcloud from 512 MB to 2 GB.
Okay! I added a small separate function into the code, that helped me.
@girish Is it a different product, though? Technically, probably, but it would be so lovely to run docker compose apps next to dockerfile apps as custom apps on Cloudron within a container, even if I have to make custom changes to the docker compose setting to make it work.
Or, alternatively, you guys bring a docker compose manager on the market (yes, that would be a different product, but totally in-brand). A competitor to portainer (too corporate) and coolify (bad UI).
I would be willing to pay a premium, just in case you ever decided to do that.
@fbartels Of course I wouldn't want to run them next to Cloudron, only as apps within Cloudron.
For an active mailbox in Cloudron, which I don't want to delete, I would like to configure a forwarder to another address. Currently, I have to go inside Roundcube to do that, but it would be great to do that inside the email settings in Cloudron.
Currently, I get the error "mailbox already exists", but is it really too far-fetched to keep the existing inbox and still forward afterwards?
Example use case: An employee leaves. I don't want to delete the inbox as historical emails might become relevant in the future, but I want from now on to receive all e-mails going to that address myself.
Yes, I know that failed backup notifications are already raised in the dashboard, but that requires me to go and look there. I have a mission-critical app that should update every day and I literally had the case that while I was on vacation, it failed one day. Nothing happened, it backed up the next day, but I simply didn't look into the dashboard that day like usually.
That's where the feature request is coming from.
I second this, all our delivery problems went away when we started using Postmark. And it costs us 10 USD per month.
Yes, it is new, but I suggested it because I found it promising from what I saw. Besides, I'd love to have such a tool on Cloudron.
I am currently contemplating about a good security and emergency strategy and maybe others here have thought about this too, so maybe someone has some deeper thoughts about this:
I am currently running two cloudron instances, "private" and "business". Only I have access to "business" but it gives me the opportunity to split apps between two instances in case one fails.
However, I am generally willing and interested to host both passwords via vaultwarden and also 2-factor-authentication on Cloudron, possibly on separate instances. However, I need to secure my vaultwarden instance with 2FA, obviously.
Now I am thinking, let's say worst case, both my laptop and my mobile phone get stolen. How do I get access now to my server and my data, considering that I cannot get access to my passwords or to confirm 2FA on a separate device?
Probably I need some sort of lifeline, but I am not really sure how this would look like, considering both security and practicability.
@girish said in Backup time considers timezones incorrectly:
I think you are suggesting showing the Settings Timezone in the Backup Schedule UI, correct? If so, that's a good idea!
Yes, that was what I was suggesting
The timezone shown in the UI is based on browser timezone . If you had multiple admins, each in their timezones, then the UI shows the correct timestamps.
I understand the logic, however, have a look at the screenshot. 
Seemingly, the backup starts at 1am, but it finishes before 1am, which is confusing. In fact, it took 24 minutes in this case, but I am in a different time zone now, 1 hour back.
I am building my first custom app in Docker in Python and I want to host it on Cloudron.
Currently, the repository is set up on docker.com. I have set up the repository in the cloudron settings using an access token. I have a CloudronManifest.json, a Dockerfile and the requirements file (since it's python), but I am stuck when running
cloudron build
as I consistently run into this error message:
WARNING: Retrying (Retry(total=4, connect=None, read=None, redirect=None, status=None)) after connection broken by 'NewConnectionError('<pip._vendor.urllib3.connection.HTTPSConnection object at 0x7fc9470e4750>: Failed to establish a new connection: [Errno -3] Temporary failure in name resolution')': /simple/asgiref/
The same comes with any other package that happens to be the first in the requirements file.
I am the owner of the Docker repository.
Does anyone know what I can do about it?
If we are talking about the business case of this, then I wouldn't think too big - yes, some companies have to follow regulations and would opt for another solution. Sure, that's fine.
The target group would be all kinds of small server owners. I would use it for my private and my small company server where I am, fortunately, not bound by regulations.
I don't know actually who preferably uses Cloudron, whether this is more of a company product or if this is more used by small companies or private individuals.
Regarding the possible markup, I think Cloudron would need to find once a cooperation partner company that could guarantee a good setup. If Cloudron used Backblaze, for example, then I could use them myself. But there are tons of smaller, yet reliable companies that could provide a good solution.
Maybe other users can also weigh in on their needs if someone else reads this?
@simong said in Support for docker compose:
@ekevu123 I would recommend to use dokploy.com if you do not need the additional features of coolify.
I have just tried dokploy and I like it a lot for docker compose setups. It was super simple to use and much easier than dockge or coolify.
I might run potentially one server with cloudron and one with dokploy, so that I can cover all kinds of deployments.
@jdaviescoates This is an idea I have quickly considered as well but one reason why I want to move this installation to Cloudron so desperately is that I want to have less work with it, not more 
We will probably need to live with the fact that we will need to re-share all information again and simply do the move using one of the manual ways (e.g. user migration plugin). That will create chaos for a day or two, but at least then we will have a more stable installation.
Thank you, that has helped!
Ah, just found it - apparently, I restrict access to the page in the general settings, and then in the settings of the individual post, I can set access to "public". Then the page itself is still password-protected, but the text is now included into the API call.
@nebulon Yes, I know, but it doesn't show any update. Perhaps because I am running Cloudron 7.3 in the instance with the newer Nextcloud version and 7.2 in the other, where the update is not shown?