Cloudron Forum

AlternativeTo link:- https://alternativeto.net/software/notediscovery/about/

Resolved by restoring com.espocrm.cloudronapp@2.20.4 Then updating to Cloudron 2.20.5 Then updating to Cloudron 2.20.6 (EspoCRM 9.3.6) I had a lot of apps going into error when 9.1.6 got installed on a reboot. Upgrading to 9.1.7 (out of beta) fixed most of them, but EspoCRM needed this intervention. Just FWIW if others are encountering the same.

Fixed with the latest update https://forum.cloudron.io/post/123645

@James thank you, will check it out and report back

@James thank you I had not initially intended to use CloudronVersions in this way, but it is a real time saver. Yep, once an app is published, probably no trimming (unless very old revoked versions).

@firmansi yes, it’s in “in production” for me. Have not used everything because there’s so much that can be done. Currently for me it is : one of my Telegram bot handlers, providing some basic tasks handing invoice downloading from a couple of suppliers who require login and fetch Planning to extend its functionality. Only “issue” is that Searx is too slow for it so I use Brave API for search - cost is pennies.

Thanks @girish TBH, most people don't read docs despite all this Yep, true Soon there won't be any docs. AI coding agent utility will produce some illegible binary asset "cloudron.aifood", which another agent will use. We humans won't need to know or read anything. Thanks @nebulon maybe better some https://foo.bar/changelog link nice idea, let me think about that. testing my build script which makes it a mandatory input (to overcome my lack of discipline )

Device Authorization Flow is implemented in 9.1.4 (will be released shortly). With this, it won't require cors/callback.

Not sure anybody cares (which is fine, my itch is scratched), but ... BISQ API HEADLESS : updated API calls removed the SKILL (because I don't want to duplicate it and it sits more naturally in the Nanobot repository: the updated skill has been deployed there) [image: 1772822611359-screenshot-2026-03-06-at-17.25.12.png]

yeah seems strange if it did. I don't have any mac device to test and replicate this unfortunately

@timconsidine Thanks but I had packaged it a while ago as a test but never published it.

@timconsidine thanks, fixed!

@robi good approach, but I suspect your neuro-plasticity far exceeds mine !

Could this maybe be the case where a backup site does not include the platform backups? The main backups list (below the backup sites) only shows backups which include the platform backups also. I had this confusion myself also and we may want to split those two views to avoid this confusion. Otherwise you might have hit some bug

With Mistral subscription I have almost infinite calls to Mistral API at not extra cost just by enabling the experiment mode in their subscription because no way I want to pay per token usage.

@James absolutely ! Very cool ! That was actually a break-through moment to get over blind poking and assessing output. So thank you again.

@Kubernetes sometimes I just hate IT