Cloudron Forum

@shrey there's some cases where the backup code forgets about older backups. For example, if you switch backup providers (even temporarily). We are trying to improve the whole situation in 9.0 . For a start, with multiple providers, we can track/cleanup more accurately. BTW, if you paste the filename of the backup in your Eventlog, does it find it there? I will look into making this more clearer i.e what is getting deleted and why not getting deleted.

@nebulon said in "fatal: not a git repository": Have you tried to use a subfolder in /app/data/ for this? This is where data is kept persistently in Cloudron. Been using this folder and seems like it has had no issues for a week or two now thanks for clarifying

@rosano interesting. I guess this is a way to beat CNAME cloaking for analytics. This is indeed not the purpose of the App Proxy (i.e it's not meant to proxy external sites).

@girish said in multiple static sites on one app: A "hack" if you really really really want a single app would be to use the LAMP app. You can add any number of alias domains. After that , yu have to then configure apache there to serve up different folders based on the request domain. Indeed, though you need to have a bit of Apache server knowledge and you can configure all your virtual hosts inside the Apache configuration file, which is named app.conf on Cloudron. As a matter of fact DO offers a pretty decent Apache configuration tutorial. It's relatively easy, you don't need to know everything, just how to host multiple static pages on once instance. Have fun.

There is a bug in Cloudron that it parses swap info incorrectly when there are no swaps in the system. This is fixed in https://git.cloudron.io/cloudron/box/-/commit/b66e77a2d8930381c95153b041d7c3edd331364a

@rosano woo hoo! Thanks for this not having to learn much of Docker tutorial!

@rosano that's actually very small. I was thinking maybe it was some GBs in size. How is the general free memory situation on your server? The kernel just chooses some process at random and nukes it. (random from user's point of view, I am sure kernel has some heuristic).

@rosano instead of deleting /apps.swap , just keep it 0 size and remove the fstab line. Cloudron recreates the swap file on reboot (since that is the recommended setup for linux). so truncate -s0 /apps.swap is good enough.

Solved by upgrading macOS git to latest version as suggested here.

Those are only container upper limits, not what the apps will use. You can significantly increase the size of the swap file for more headroom, but things will slow down while swapping. You'll want more RAM as certain apps will use a lot more when you start heavier use. Cost wise, there are server providers that max RAM such as Contabo and SSDNodes at a decent price.

@girish can you just set them much lower like 20s?

Or if the app supports import/export of it's own, then install the latest version of the app and import the previous one into it.

@BrutalBirdie I did also check but I think I'm at 60% of capacity.

@fbartels that is correct, admins can login to all apps always. This was the case from the get-go and now it is a bit hard to change this behavior since setups depend on this. But maybe worth reevaluating.

@girish indeed symlink deletion was broken and is fixed now for the next release.

@rosano 2GB is the minimum for a single Discourse app, if you have other apps running as well, it's probably not enough - so yes, more RAM = better. I haven't tried a migration, but installing and setting it up worked fine.

@girish ok i was on the initial setup and i had to click 'show advanced settings' and then set the subdomain to the zone. a simple hint after the error with something like your message would be super helpful on that page. i'm super busy right now but could try a merge request if that would be welcome. i appreciate the quick help, thank you.

@jdaviescoates said in Easy Indie App—Run your own X in a few clicks: Yeah btw.so itself looks/ sounds like it'll be a useful app to add to the wishlist once it's ready. I just asked and they said: Yes, it will be possible to self-host btw and the code will available soon (we're pre-launch)! It is now possible to self-host so I've just added it to the wishlist here: https://forum.cloudron.io/post/73350