@girish I think that might be an improvement worth considering, no? Making the necessary changes would (I think)... Make it clear to monitoring tools and manual checks by users which processes being run are local to the host and which are from containers, particularly useful when multiple instances of a service are being run both on the host and container. Follow what appears to be "best practices" when running containers. Improve security in certain situations. Admittedly these may be minor and not worth the overhead, but now that I'm aware of the behaviour, I'm a bit irked by it as it currently prevents me from easily identifying which services are container-run and which are local to the host, as well as making it confusing to which user is actually running the process listed.

@eddowding ah, great you managed to figure this out. indeed, cloudflare can only proxy http(s) and not email.

To close this, turned out that "libpython3.8" was missing on my newly upgraded 20.04 Hetzner system...therefore I was getting the message "dependency problems prevent configuration of collectd"

@girish Thank you for those commands. I think I'll just use the cloudron push after I run cloudron install on my image server. Also, not sure if there is a specific way to go about this but I could strip this down a bit to have a base install for the app if it's of use to the Cloudron community. I'm sure it would have to be polished by the devs but it is an install for Timetrex CE which is a timeclock software that our company uses.

@vladimir-d This is already fixed in the coming release - https://git.cloudron.io/cloudron/box/-/commit/6d044bfbf384b8ae98f1beac0f9d1c50005e8d34 . For now, you can ignore the warning, it's harmless.

@marcusquinn I understand your time constraints, unfortunately I am not able to trigger the behavior you are describing, so this is hard to find a fix for it. Maybe if you have some time, can you describe how one of those apps was setup initially before you adjusted the access control from the groups panel?

@nebulon Yeah fair enough. I figured it was a decision based on app compatability. Thankfully I only had 40 apps to go through

My understanding is that mint is primarily targeting a Desktop environment.

Sorry, this was a duplicate post, because the first didn't go through for a while. Please ignore, and answer the question in the other forum.

@girish that worked. Thanks

Thank you @d19dotca @nebulon @robi for your replies. I use adguard on the same server which allows for DNS rewrites. I guess I was trying to achieve what Resilio sync does (e.g. connect to peers using LAN when in LAN). In this case, I wanted to try by pointing the DNS name of nextcloud installation to local server IP:port. I am not sure if this will be possible (probably not right? unless I change the server itself in my nextcloud client?). If it's not possible, it is OK I guess.

Success! Re-installed Ubuntu, added nothing, and everything worked as advertised!

@ianhyzy for nginx configs? No, they're on the Cloudron host.

@girish I don't know if it was installed before the upgrade, but it wasn't enabled, because unbound managed to run without problem I'm not sure how it got there. It was supposed to be a clean Ubuntu 16.04. The only things I installed manually besides cloudron are basically ZSH and screen. In any case, I marked this as solved, thanks !

I finally managed to get to the bottom of this. There was a bug in the postgresql addon backup logic where connections were not closed properly. This resulted in periodic backups keeping lots of connections open. This is fixed in 6.3.

@msbt yes, thanks for reaching out, will take a look.

@subtlecourage said in Outbound SMTP not working on my External Relay: It says it should be coming from noreplay@domain.com, but instead it is coming from imanalias@domain.com Can you clarify what you mean by "it says"? Is there some error/warning somewhere? Also, I assume that you have put a custom domain in fastmail and also fastmail is able to relay mail as any email address i.e <anything>@domain.com ?

@nj Thank you I'm trying to do it without manual intervention. More or less got the shared volume mount working.