Cloudron Forum

@girish This is an interesting observation. I was just looking to see if this was a real security threat or not, and I suppose it isn't but can offer a bit more privacy using the wildcard approach. Any particular reason why the Let's Encrypt wildcard support can't be done through the actual Cloudron wildcard DNS approach? Is there a way to support this? I'd really like to take advantage of a smaller DNS provider which has some great monitoring features included, but it isn't supported via any API by Cloudron yet, so if I go that route I can only use the Wildcard option, but those don't actually allow for the wildcard certificates.

Edit: Nevermind, I see why in the docs: "Let's Encrypt only allows obtaining wildcard certificates using DNS automation. Cloudron will default to obtaining wildcard certificates when using one of the programmatic DNS API providers."

@Felix Did you manage to install it?

I think you're right, it took a while to propogate fully.

@girish yes, that’s a much better idea. Essentially the ability to “swap” app instances, or in other words the ability to easily promote from staging app instance to production app instance on the same server. That’d be ideal. 🙂

@jodumont from experience I know MX doesn’t work because the mailserver doesn’t respond to IPv6. That way we’ve lost some mails before we discovered that.

Hi @derek sorry for the delayed answer, did you manage to solve this after the TTLs have expired from your attempts?

Ah seems to be working now thanks - I had added my full domain foo.ddns.net to the zone name field initially as It autofilled ddns.net and I thought that cloundron might then try to generate subdomains with the foo part missing e.g. my.ddns.net which wouldn't work but apparently not. Thanks for the Help!

There is an entry in the issue tracker for powerdns already at https://git.cloudron.io/cloudron/box/issues/117

Regarding the Linux distribution, we currently only support Ubuntu in versions 16.04 and 18.04 and due to testing effort, we don't currently plan on adding further distributions.

@marcusquinn I like the idea of atleast just adding a doc page for the moment on how to do this manually till we implement the feature. I will add it our docs.